Re: [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors early review of draft-ietf-netconf-yang-push-06

"Mehmet Ersue" <mersue@gmail.com> Tue, 16 May 2017 13:00 UTC

Return-Path: <mersue@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A84051296CF for <yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 May 2017 06:00:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MhSOm7rqrVUh for <yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 May 2017 06:00:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x233.google.com (mail-qk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A009129A8D for <yang-doctors@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 May 2017 05:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x233.google.com with SMTP id a72so127623094qkj.2 for <yang-doctors@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 May 2017 05:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-language:thread-index; bh=LzQy3yFtxskQ+++TG4X2X0LcN3n6esVdAWfW0buI8fM=; b=sXQzwx2AEyaRXy82q/y9c1nksz9PcTeyxiho4OwgpaJjbCtTVqPiR2lN50VjIye9pG pReEl0ByO8nPywNat5s+hYNT/H5Qcy2n1UIE3N2OHca7awKfcOYyOMT9YyR29ABSIx1I i42z6oou952FXiuug1IWhPPqDLnFneNz67WB7YQLT14PNqyETIHCq2zB0RwDLBAseHzG lTjmBLLWJoDu3o51YTCH8JEJUDeOiSD5AU2qDYfNVpnZOlljpmjxk+wwL2c7KgeUOH+x IGibmyUdZd7rWyqErPF6cxhVDgm+1WT4ydifhU8MuWMspDwmV8q6XFfRu+vDBI2w0XtU sUpg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :thread-index; bh=LzQy3yFtxskQ+++TG4X2X0LcN3n6esVdAWfW0buI8fM=; b=kLLNqLgSJjzP6Cb9EsMubJiQi+wHu9WOJz2iYC4uf0xeCwpNbs3XCj6PEeToKmk27N aslSYxGrS+6rO6te8eCvq8m9Fx7TshBKyt0LlNQKr943F6SQ6lWIRhzfubEDVo8B/5Bq LsSM1W/LkFPaadbNsUljEC+7iswqXvTzuzuULwzr8KxLFJl37A2+at+x+aZ9mu8XAN45 dCW3ojd9eMbv+zBYOHXPaBE6ufj7Yc5XFm4wbEVdQM2ixCz2NYX7NzsMbExMQHLDAte8 WBQBSHqlec/55qq003hCCjpn6Y9O4lOYIwXtzeab+wuiQ8UZHEYOJfCUVsdeX2DYIT/e W0yA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBO6d7ImONKtO1opwmyXG2qwbVjArUMTzJ/InQ2RB0WzXKDno9E pdAZPYM5tEmofanJ
X-Received: by 10.80.180.155 with SMTP id w27mr8538301edd.42.1494939374525; Tue, 16 May 2017 05:56:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOPFLHJVQJ (p57A77CA4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [87.167.124.164]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 4sm516665edt.64.2017.05.16.05.56.13 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 16 May 2017 05:56:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mehmet Ersue <mersue@gmail.com>
To: 'Bert Wijnen' <bwietf@bwijnen.net>, yang-doctors@ietf.org
References: <149493827145.11944.9758454721784881844@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <149493827145.11944.9758454721784881844@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 14:56:14 +0200
Message-ID: <00cc01d2ce43$cd8c7270$68a55750$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: de
Thread-Index: AQD+pPXBVw0ojlJdSbkzWoE2oyBdJ6OfPXvA
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/yang-doctors/8dAq3nLkGB77_gUfAp72RnT5K7w>
Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors early review of draft-ietf-netconf-yang-push-06
X-BeenThere: yang-doctors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: email list of the yang-doctors directorate <yang-doctors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/yang-doctors/>
List-Post: <mailto:yang-doctors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 13:00:12 -0000

Thank you Bert!

Cheers,
Mehmet

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bert Wijnen [mailto:bwietf@bwijnen.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 2:38 PM
> To: yang-doctors@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-netconf-yang-push.all@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org;
> netconf@ietf.org
> Subject: Yangdoctors early review of draft-ietf-netconf-yang-push-06
> 
> Reviewer: Bert Wijnen
> Review result: On the Right Track
> 
> 
> - last para of sect 3.5.
>   This seems to me to make it difficult to create interoperable
>   implementations. Or is there a way for a client to figure out what
>   is or is not support, other than tryal and error?
> - page 41:
> 
>      /* YANG Parser Pyang crashing on the following syntax below
> 
>   So does the definition get skipped? Or what needs to happen here?
> 
> Consistency
> 
> - last bullet on page 7 talks about "YANG subtrees". I do not see that term
>   in netconf or yang documents. Those just talk about "subtrees".
> Maybe I am
>   not looking good enough?
> - top of page 8 I see the words "xpath", "Xpath" and "XPath"
>   is there a difference?
> 
> Nits
> 
> - you may want to check the reference/citation occurrences of [subscribe]
>   at several places it points to
>      draft-ietf-netconf-yang-push-06#ref-subscribe
>   whereas I think it intends to point to the [subscribe] in the
>   normative references section
> - first bullet on page 5:
>      Enhancements to filters. Specifically the filter MUST at identify at
>      least one targeted yang
>    s/at//  -- the first "at" seems superfluous
>    plus, you are using capitalized MUST with out reference/citation of
>    RFC2119
> - page 36:
> 
>     leaf dependency {
>       type sn:subscription-id;
>       description
>         "Provides the Subscription ID of a parent subscription which
>          has absolute priority should that parent have push updates
>          ready to egress the publisher. In other words, there should be
>          no streaming of objects from the current subscription if of
>          the parent has something ready to push.";
>       reference
>         "RFC-7540, section 5.3.1";
>     }
> 
>      s/if of/if/ ??