[yang-doctors] Yangdoctors early review of draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-filename-00
Jürgen Schönwälder via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sun, 27 October 2024 16:45 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: yang-doctors@ietf.org
Delivered-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from [10.244.8.143] (unknown [104.131.183.230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 648D5C14F5EB; Sun, 27 Oct 2024 09:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Jürgen Schönwälder via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: yang-doctors@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.26.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <173004750398.233139.6168831221518350449@dt-datatracker-6cdf944fd9-dld6h>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 09:45:03 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: N2EFKT6NLXXJ4T7HH4M7ES4GNVTGDH5M
X-Message-ID-Hash: N2EFKT6NLXXJ4T7HH4M7ES4GNVTGDH5M
X-MailFrom: noreply@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-yang-doctors.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-filename.all@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Reply-To: Jürgen Schönwälder <jschoenwaelder@constructor.university>
Subject: [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors early review of draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-filename-00
List-Id: Email list of the yang-doctors directorate <yang-doctors.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/yang-doctors/RXvXt09xE2FZTVoZ6AvPedRqnuA>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/yang-doctors>
List-Help: <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:yang-doctors-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:yang-doctors@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:yang-doctors-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:yang-doctors-leave@ietf.org>
Reviewer: Jürgen Schönwälder Review result: Not Ready This document does not contain any YANG definitions and hence it is not clear what a YANG doctor review of this document should be. That said, I believe the document is not ready since it unnecessarily modifies RFC 7950 rules. I will post more detailed comments as an individual contributor to the NETMOD mailing list.
- [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors early review of draft-… Jürgen Schönwälder via Datatracker