IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [yang-doctors] Datatracker usage

mersue@gmail.com Mon, 15 January 2024 16:18 UTC

Return-Path: <mersue@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE3E7C14F5F6 for <yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 08:18:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CBsuBAoapAHb for <yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 08:18:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ej1-x632.google.com (mail-ej1-x632.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::632]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8881BC14F5EF for <yang-doctors@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 08:18:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ej1-x632.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a2d04888d3dso293116166b.2 for <yang-doctors@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 08:18:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1705335487; x=1705940287; darn=ietf.org; h=content-language:thread-index:mime-version:message-id:date:subject :in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=e7/f4ImLmBNzMMS8y0FcZ5snm6s8PEOiaZxumeXOH/s=; b=hZa3wJRMGxU4j1qB2yIqPQTTdN57kZkyUIa9lz4c/DJ39S5v7B9lpBgpqeJ7FiyX6+ pDzjqiPHMSHWA4AWgwxJxRG0+U3/eAF9Vj6Hv9aN8KW0AoXq/TTXefqalp2PatdCp4RF Z8h6O+0m90KA6Y6KwSa8ugzLYF8PbumVvlHpD3qCgGNKxyF/tVAfyaP2PldKoO1akO4d LAlAOyjiUoUxVmu/WZF+szwHC19ux+4IDVhmsBKTvUXNWCF5OKfIiamDS8nms35QcUJb bx01Rz047hm0V312ufbkfF0qghJtGE/NdVMJOnfI5Nq3zk/0Wk0njT7utUQHgVaKtAMp AN/g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1705335487; x=1705940287; h=content-language:thread-index:mime-version:message-id:date:subject :in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=e7/f4ImLmBNzMMS8y0FcZ5snm6s8PEOiaZxumeXOH/s=; b=wYTThGEPfAnNcZWAI9necBRYkHRrPts0SNvbcLzT7CjQO0TVPfvCmfwhsVh0t8w2eX RWwfQXbAyCB8a9SSGjBeea+JXZAlu7Xd4mR4+zIqhCQT3QrtQmU/p/1Isx16mi6K3uvN GpgYyucNIHwQGhXsaR+zQ8t2El22TK2N2zIJuuOTqeQGZrsl8D+AguPoZm9FyMq2WmU+ 6AkFZPM+cu2FWxJrS6iT5SC3Z9RdyCVanpsxnb+NYZ637skKfgFJd8qzpwu+uF9vLYgh T9tbkVvhHlQwv1KZqTVgbtqDWtvQywNFJnyietFU4W8k0RVV2hPIN5VSoEY9ciI14E0L jtSg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzcIKREp+WsOFBvtutm79l/ud+u/hrzG7DeCXNo/xnplXsK7g81 Ggx6jennS18+jJmG3jo6Sdc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE3De+qTEytAOacwcrCF8u+3A/x4alsbbPffzDFGt8X+jiATGp9QtMj4cX0YYEk1WON3gYpiw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:9c8f:b0:a2d:9379:7fe6 with SMTP id fj15-20020a1709069c8f00b00a2d93797fe6mr1333262ejc.61.1705335486589; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 08:18:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from LAPTOP9UGDBRQB ([2a02:4e0:2d7e:1a40:b9f6:1722:5ac7:87a4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a5-20020a1709063e8500b00a28badcf367sm5432174ejj.54.2024.01.15.08.18.04 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Jan 2024 08:18:05 -0800 (PST)
From: mersue@gmail.com
To: 'Rahman' <reshad=40yahoo.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, 'Andy Bierman' <andy@yumaworks.com>, 'Robert Sparks' <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Cc: 'YANG Doctors' <yang-doctors@ietf.org>, dromasca@gmail.com
References: <CABCOCHQ-ozq0KFCRv8LnJTWKGmLwgk_VK6JSEm6jghy56vKoDQ@mail.gmail.com> <67ADB446-9CD7-4FC8-A536-C331D4AB8A48@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <67ADB446-9CD7-4FC8-A536-C331D4AB8A48@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 19:18:01 +0300
Message-ID: <01e001da47ce$6a434700$3ec9d500$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01E1_01DA47E7.8F92C8F0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQHA9Cw8aBdGyNYGN6IvWCtlP7cOvALBJc81sPenedA=
Content-Language: de
X-AVK-Virus-Check: AVA 25.37163;65FCBFD
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/yang-doctors/el4QZMDpdWPMRehJ2wq0L8KDuH0>
Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] Datatracker usage
X-BeenThere: yang-doctors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email list of the yang-doctors directorate <yang-doctors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/yang-doctors/>
List-Post: <mailto:yang-doctors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 16:18:10 -0000

Hi All,

 

> My recollection is that for small changes in the document, especially when done right after the initial review, it’s ok for the YD to update the initial review. Otherwise, it’s a > new review requested by the WG owning the document.

 

Our regular process is that for a new draft with new content a new review is required.

Though revising a review is possible. In this case I would assume that one keeps the old text and adds to it.

 

However, loosing the 00-review text on the server looks a bit unusual.

 

May be Robert can check what happened on the server.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-teas-yang-te-34-yangdoctors-early-bierman-2023-11-28/01/

 

@Robert: The question is why the 00-review text got lost as a result of revising.

 

Thanks,

Mehmet

 

From: yang-doctors <yang-doctors-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Rahman
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2024 1:26 AM
To: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
Cc: YANG Doctors <yang-doctors@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] Datatracker usage

 

 

Sent from my iPhone





On Jan 14, 2024, at 4:07 PM, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com <mailto:andy@yumaworks.com> > wrote:



 

 

On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 9:55 AM Reshad Rahman <reshad@yahoo.com <mailto:reshad@yahoo.com> > wrote:

Not sure what procedure you used but I'd have expected 00 to have the initial review and 01 to have the new review.

 

 

 

Yes -- maybe it is just a WEB page issue, and the link to the old review is wrong.

Rather than the old review was overwritten with the 01 version.

 

It is still not clear if the YANG doctor is supposed to review a draft update

or if the submitter is supposed to request a new review.

 

My recollection is that for small changes in the document, especially when done right after the initial review, it’s ok for the YD to update the initial review. Otherwise, it’s a new review requested by the WG owning the document.

 

I assume you clicked on ´correct review’? My guess is that it’s a datatracker issue.

 

Regards,

Reshad.

 





 

 

Andy

 

 

On Sunday, January 14, 2024, 12:25:16 PM EST, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com <mailto:andy@yumaworks.com> > wrote: 

 

 

Hi,

 

What is the official procedure for a followup review after the authors have created a new version?

 

I was told to just revise the initial review on the WEB page.  (Wrong!)

 

E.g. 

 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-teas-yang-te-34-yangdoctors-early-bierman-2023-11-28/01/

 

However, now it appears the first review of draft-34 is gone, and only the 1 sentence

followup for draft-35 remains as the review.

 

I expected the review of draft-34 to be appended, but all record of it is gone.

 

I suggest the IETF figure out a procedure and a tool for followup YANG reviews.

 

 

Andy

 

_______________________________________________
yang-doctors mailing list
yang-doctors@ietf.org <mailto:yang-doctors@ietf.org> 
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-doctors

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email