[yang-doctors] If a protocol spec. is experimental, should the YANG module be experimental?
Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Wed, 22 November 2017 09:16 UTC
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6893128C9C for <yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 01:16:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EnksSCuqgx8w for <yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 01:16:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B7DE120726 for <yang-doctors@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 01:16:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=290; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1511342209; x=1512551809; h=to:cc:from:subject:message-id:date:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=4s30J9W2E1Qii9a8JFvRdeYekKKquNR7owPUKIfWh4E=; b=QC0v+9ouetHIWNjZ+SLIQO9eG4QmdvIPDgIoRz2awfEaDwuI50TAdMFm JNSrFAP9vQOzu0mRP/01liI9WeKYoQYm4CuaH1yAW6IDSqmtRnOvrYZWk 6hfx533wimkRcl1RoSLAye9tNpCHvYNMLLHOqeGAJfGN5frEpVLYiU2U5 Q=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.44,436,1505779200"; d="scan'208";a="368471"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Nov 2017 09:16:47 +0000
Received: from [10.55.221.36] (ams-bclaise-nitro3.cisco.com [10.55.221.36]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vAM9Glkq021181; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 09:16:47 GMT
To: YANG Doctors <yang-doctors@ietf.org>
Cc: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>, "Stig Venaas (svenaas)" <svenaas@cisco.com>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <e61f00ac-b290-a4c8-4add-fd12555a921c@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 10:16:47 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/yang-doctors/zQJAdNp-XhG-kQpxbhmU26N2ryM>
Subject: [yang-doctors] If a protocol spec. is experimental, should the YANG module be experimental?
X-BeenThere: yang-doctors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email list of the yang-doctors directorate <yang-doctors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/yang-doctors/>
List-Post: <mailto:yang-doctors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 09:16:51 -0000
Dear YANG doctors, I'm specifically asking for the MIB doctors knowledge, as I'm sure you have cross this issue. When a protocol RFC is experimental, does it mean that the YANG module (MIB module in the past) must be experimental? No strong feeling on my side. Regards, Benoit
- [yang-doctors] If a protocol spec. is experimenta… Benoit Claise