Re: [Yot] contents of SID registration authority
peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> Thu, 15 February 2018 08:28 UTC
Return-Path: <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
X-Original-To: yot@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yot@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40CD2126C89 for <yot@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 00:28:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1P0t182WQT7P for <yot@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 00:28:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lb1-smtp-cloud9.xs4all.net (lb1-smtp-cloud9.xs4all.net [194.109.24.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23D7F126C23 for <yot@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 00:28:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from webmail.xs4all.nl ([IPv6:2001:888:0:22:194:109:20:216]) by smtp-cloud9.xs4all.net with ESMTPA id mEuSeeKkKoWCOmEuSeRj4v; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 09:28:54 +0100
Received: from AMontpellier-654-1-73-22.w90-0.abo.wanadoo.fr ([90.0.168.22]) by webmail.xs4all.nl with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Thu, 15 Feb 2018 09:28:52 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 09:28:52 +0100
From: peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
To: Michel Veillette <Michel.Veillette@trilliantinc.com>
Cc: yot@ietf.org, consultancy@vanderstok.org, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
Organization: vanderstok consultancy
Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
Mail-Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
In-Reply-To: <BN6PR06MB2308A232AF7F2382F2344EDEFEF50@BN6PR06MB2308.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
References: <792b282a276d738ddfaf519668a008a4@xs4all.nl> <BN6PR06MB2308A232AF7F2382F2344EDEFEF50@BN6PR06MB2308.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <dababb77f3473da4817b8e85eefc8347@xs4all.nl>
X-Sender: stokcons@xs4all.nl
User-Agent: XS4ALL Webmail
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfFxuQVSmlP42KtSi6k11Jq7Sx9GKRU9WsXSpG15+Nv4dNGXOrWy+0QOWrgVZ36Wqh67I536CTxqZcHXi03SaerPhtRZDCij1dWqXTzqvR8F/koudiXS2 QUNxqixHE3zAV6TamOeaRwoaB/KiVmG6dVg8VBg7q3RU067pBr+DRoGUKLtM+MP+/akx3v6lqQQ1Pg2D1Ymp3C7bBpXVMrbUAsPgRUsTWJR5F+M02zpxhpSN DImYtaAvHO9OjScSxcp1sr5LRq61RXAEu7zP8pIS61hc32uh0jJ0mCwr2h0CwmzD
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/yot/qnEa7D01uvx3dAH8kCHRbxH6qxk>
Subject: Re: [Yot] contents of SID registration authority
X-BeenThere: yot@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Yang of Things <yot.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/yot>, <mailto:yot-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/yot/>
List-Post: <mailto:yot@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yot-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yot>, <mailto:yot-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 08:28:59 -0000
Thanks Michel, Do I understand correctly, that for yang modules which are planned to be part of a future RFC, the authors are encouraged to do a provisional SID allocation from the ietf range which becomes finalized after RFC publication. two remarks: If my interpretation is correct, the text needs some clarification. Secondly, how to make a difference between provisional and final? Slowly, the feeling creeps on me that we need a IANA validation somewhere on the route. Many thanks for all your explanations. Going through the SID allocation process is really educational. Greetings, peter Michel Veillette schreef op 2018-02-14 21:07: > Hi Peter > > === About "remove ietf-restconf@2016-08-15 because there is already an > ietf-restconf@2017-01-26 owned by ietf" > > ietf-restconf is imported by other YANG modules. > To automatically resolve these imports, it is more convenient to keep > this module in the SID registry. > Furthermore, the SID assigned to the ietf-restconf module can be used > in the yang library > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-veillette-core-yang-library/) > The new version of ietf-restconf should be added however. > > === About " What is the policy for drafts that become rfcs? will they > be entered automatically? > The latter will mean that the originally attributed SIDs are replaced > with the values from the ietf range?" > > The second bullet in > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-core-sid-03#section-6.1.1 > address this topic. > In summary, we allows final SIDs allocation after working group > adoption. > In this case, the transition to RFC have no impacts. > > o The range of 1000 to 59,999 is reserved for YANG modules defined > in RFCs. The IANA policy for future additions to this sub- > registry is "RFC required" [RFC5226]. Allocation within this > range requires publishing of the associated ".yang" and ".sid" > files in the YANG module registry. The allocation within this > range is done prior to the RFC publication but should not be done > prior to the working group adoption. > > Regards, > Michel > > -----Original Message----- > From: peter van der Stok [mailto:stokcons@xs4all.nl] > Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2018 5:20 AM > To: Michel Veillette <Michel.Veillette@trilliantinc.com>; Michael > Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> > Subject: contents of SID registration authority > > Hi Michel and Michael, > > I looked at the contents of SID registration authority. > > I have the following suggestions for mcr314 entries: > - Replace ietf-voucher@2017-10-25 by ietf-voucher@2018-01-24; better > would be to have an ietf version which is updated with the latest > version. > - remove ietf-restconf@2016-08-15 because there is already an > ietf-restconf@2017-01-26 owned by ietf > > What is the policy for drafts that become rfcs?; will they be entered > automatically? > The latter will mean that the originally attributed SIDs are replaced > with the values from the ietf range? > > Greetings, > > Peter > > -- > Peter van der Stok > vanderstok consultancy > mailto: consultancy@vanderstok.org > www: www.vanderstok.org > tel NL: +31(0)492474673 F: +33(0)966015248
- Re: [Yot] contents of SID registration authority Michel Veillette
- Re: [Yot] contents of SID registration authority peter van der Stok
- Re: [Yot] contents of SID registration authority Michel Veillette
- Re: [Yot] contents of SID registration authority peter van der Stok
- Re: [Yot] contents of SID registration authority peter van der Stok
- Re: [Yot] contents of SID registration authority Michael Richardson
- Re: [Yot] contents of SID registration authority Andy Bierman
- Re: [Yot] contents of SID registration authority Michael Richardson
- Re: [Yot] contents of SID registration authority Michel Veillette
- Re: [Yot] contents of SID registration authority peter van der Stok