[Extra] Last Call: <draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2-24.txt> (Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) - Version 4rev2) to Proposed Standard[Extra] Last Call: <draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2-24.txt> (Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) - Version 4rev2) to Proposed Standard
The IESG
2021-01-06
extra
None
/arch/msg/extra/427uQqmU2s64fN2CwpeTW8ruYSE/
2981693
1932270
Last Call: <draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2-24.txt> (Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) - Version 4rev2) to Proposed StandardLast Call: <draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2-24.txt> (Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) - Version 4rev2) to Proposed Standard
The IESG
2021-01-06
ietf-announce
None
/arch/msg/ietf-announce/N1_9LshSt_dZRv2_HGDcgtgynBw/
2981694
1932271
re: Should the untagged MAILBOX response be in RFC2060?re: Should the untagged MAILBOX response be in RFC2060?
Mark Crispin
1997-01-21
imap
None
/arch/msg/imap/DFKo444tLKENiMCZ5PzphXCuU6A/
1963570
1409787
Should the untagged MAILBOX response be in RFC2060?Should the untagged MAILBOX response be in RFC2060?
Bart Schaefer
1997-01-21
imap
None
/arch/msg/imap/Fni0UCFzFcMwpwJjIsJtRBF2fOI/
1963569
1409787
Internet Monthly Report for December, 1996Internet Monthly Report for December, 1996
IMR Editor
1997-01-16
ietf
None
/arch/msg/ietf/eNdzZwx9Zai4jltjNIPyFxY6CYs/
1567291
1352402
RFC2062 on IMAP4 ObsoleteRFC2062 on IMAP4 Obsolete
RFC Editor
1996-12-04
ietf
None
/arch/msg/ietf/cobayWn2fxTffSGuPy0ipROfQBs/
1553487
1352636