Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9499 <draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis-10> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9499 <draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis-10> for your review
rfc-editor
2024-03-04
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/EuEqT5ugcRtTF27HZi9WOaa1iZ4/
3433110
2122690
[DNSOP] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-tcp-requirements-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)[DNSOP] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-tcp-requirements-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Lars Eggert via Datatracker
2021-10-26
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/PbVQeO3SGfWUdeSe6cuVQORRbbQ/
3088298
1977862
Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-13: (with COMMENT)Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-13: (with COMMENT)
Paul Hoffman
2018-08-31
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/hjxehZq86GmYf6p2e_p6c3e1Ub4/
2627272
1802631
[DNSOP] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-13: (with COMMENT)[DNSOP] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-13: (with COMMENT)
Eric Rescorla
2018-08-29
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/sdIraXh3n_3mHAzxrCSl3DcYDWE/
2626536
1802631
Re: [Pce] Comments on draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-00Re: [Pce] Comments on draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-00
Qin Wu
2013-07-15
pce
None
/arch/msg/pce/hlOnCDRYcaqizQSMi2Wno5TA458/
1129239
1542900
[Pce] Comments on draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-00[Pce] Comments on draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-00
Ning Kong
2013-07-14
pce
None
/arch/msg/pce/su9JqqFShnuaTNXWlbsMx5bX4do/
1129235
1542900
Re: [DNSOP] New draft-livingood-negative-trust-anchors-04Re: [DNSOP] New draft-livingood-negative-trust-anchors-04
Livingood, Jason
2013-02-18
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/DWqmhATgdcYZm_JSqMPMV2VcOYs/
381652
1131042
Re: [DNSOP] New draft-livingood-negative-trust-anchors-04Re: [DNSOP] New draft-livingood-negative-trust-anchors-04
Marco Davids (SIDN)
2013-02-18
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/z2x8BAGqGLgk4OzYrOfAIi6gxPw/
381647
1131042
Re: [DNSOP] IPR Disclosure: VeriSign, Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc4641bis-13 and draft-koch-dnsop-dnssec-operator-change-04Re: [DNSOP] IPR Disclosure: VeriSign, Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc4641bis-13 and draft-koch-dnsop-dnssec-operator-change-04
White, Russell
2013-01-04
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/_u-WdqBNCRAoRSYvJ75O_cKcut4/
381591
1131053
Re: [DNSOP] IPR Disclosure: VeriSign, Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc4641bis-13 and draft-koch-dnsop-dnssec-operator-change-04Re: [DNSOP] IPR Disclosure: VeriSign, Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc4641bis-13 and draft-koch-dnsop-dnssec-operator-change-04
Jiankang YAO
2012-12-24
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/J4d2IuXszqjXk5w0yjpoL4I-uKY/
381590
1131053
[DNSOP] RFC 6781 on DNSSEC Operational Practices, Version 2[DNSOP] RFC 6781 on DNSSEC Operational Practices, Version 2
rfc-editor
2012-12-22
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/atftFLKlrw4OgKJHstAmDmceQGo/
381589
1131049
RFC 6781 on DNSSEC Operational Practices, Version 2RFC 6781 on DNSSEC Operational Practices, Version 2
rfc-editor
2012-12-22
ietf-announce
None
/arch/msg/ietf-announce/xX9BT_llYv5F8T4R2QaKrgv0crA/
673510
1367603
[rfc-dist] RFC 6781 on DNSSEC Operational Practices, Version 2[rfc-dist] RFC 6781 on DNSSEC Operational Practices, Version 2
rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org
2012-12-22
rfc-dist
None
/arch/msg/rfc-dist/eozB4PhKgeDRilXVpaR5XBGZjsY/
2273643
1569486
Re: [wpkops] Second draft charter proposalRe: [wpkops] Second draft charter proposal
=JeffH
2012-09-05
wpkops
None
/arch/msg/wpkops/zhoL5_OxrJah37XBwk1yIfYueAE/
1523372
1670439
Re: [dane] Proposed text for A.4 Handling Certificate RolloverRe: [dane] Proposed text for A.4 Handling Certificate Rollover
Paul Hoffman
2012-01-21
dane
None
/arch/msg/dane/5Hl6WT6MqVCH4Nemo4S4C7soKFg/
312602
1109580
Re: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14.txtRe: [dane] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dane-protocol-14.txt
Scott Schmit
2012-01-21
dane
None
/arch/msg/dane/W7MD5Kzl-0XfDnfgAJeKXhw7UG4/
312601
1109580
Re: [dnsext] Clarifying the mandatory algorithm rulesRe: [dnsext] Clarifying the mandatory algorithm rules
Mark Andrews
2010-11-20
namedroppers
None
/arch/msg/namedroppers/JS6oXWIo35hPfwokjGjN41SB_qo/
1005751
1505864
Re: [dnsext] Clarifying the mandatory algorithm rulesRe: [dnsext] Clarifying the mandatory algorithm rules
Mark Andrews
2010-11-20
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/XE9LZaM1f_SN083ZyX2IeYUCcwQ/
368767
1127799
Re: [dnsext] Clarifying the mandatory algorithm rulesRe: [dnsext] Clarifying the mandatory algorithm rules
W.C.A. Wijngaards
2010-11-19
namedroppers
None
/arch/msg/namedroppers/L3fbO9h28FuzSngLW2iJ8S7YSTI/
1005740
1505864
Re: [dnsext] Clarifying the mandatory algorithm rulesRe: [dnsext] Clarifying the mandatory algorithm rules
W.C.A. Wijngaards
2010-11-19
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/cZiMh8oHCmrpto4BKXeAc6YH7GA/
368756
1127799
Re: [DNSOP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4641 (2391)Re: [DNSOP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4641 (2391)
Olaf Kolkman
2010-07-24
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/UuEICy4Q9magLM9cZ4JkFA3KVqQ/
380176
1131284
[DNSOP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4641 (2391)[DNSOP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4641 (2391)
RFC Errata System
2010-07-23
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/TmfKXeKIPEunl6CqSHyA6s4GIPw/
380175
1131284
Re: [DNSOP] RFC4641-bis: The case for single active keyRe: [DNSOP] RFC4641-bis: The case for single active key
Olaf Kolkman
2010-07-07
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/C-vi3bIOosCt1q0n1iIi2kT3NYc/
380157
1131297
Re: [DNSOP] RFC4641-bis: The case for single active keyRe: [DNSOP] RFC4641-bis: The case for single active key
Rose, Scott W.
2010-06-18
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/hyBRmJtGJFegRZXwAUwABogn_-I/
380107
1131297
Re: [DNSOP] RFC4641-bis: The case for single active keyRe: [DNSOP] RFC4641-bis: The case for single active key
Olafur Gudmundsson
2010-06-17
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/MTKAWLPbWQTxU1AjlpggQYl3PsY/
380103
1131297
Re: [DNSOP] RFC4641-bis: The case for single active keyRe: [DNSOP] RFC4641-bis: The case for single active key
Eric Rescorla
2010-06-17
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/El44NZzKdq6paEfCl0oIAeyNUto/
380102
1131297
[DNSOP] RFC4641-bis: The case for single active key[DNSOP] RFC4641-bis: The case for single active key
Olafur Gudmundsson
2010-06-17
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/rTm7CznQMh5m_NEapUXNhGZFmyw/
380101
1131297
Re: [DNSOP] key rollover for realRe: [DNSOP] key rollover for real
Roy Arends
2010-01-22
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/RlyKMNGlvDFI59GB_VYNywnjHcY/
379565
1131360
Re: [DNSOP] rfc4641bis: ZSK-roll-frequencyRe: [DNSOP] rfc4641bis: ZSK-roll-frequency
Edward Lewis
2010-01-21
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/v6SLhg6u9QudtvdZvuEsJPDbedM/
379517
1131360
Re: [DNSOP] rfc4641bis: ZSK-roll-frequencyRe: [DNSOP] rfc4641bis: ZSK-roll-frequency
Olaf Kolkman
2010-01-21
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/3bUMO5LTjLk9wzJb1QF0_ABFq6I/
379516
1131360
Re: [DNSOP] rfc4641bis: ZSK-roll-frequencyRe: [DNSOP] rfc4641bis: ZSK-roll-frequency
Rose, Scott W.
2010-01-21
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/TWwTVAhCVf-1BHgY5pzSneklVSM/
379515
1131360
Re: [DNSOP] rfc4641bis: ZSK-roll-frequencyRe: [DNSOP] rfc4641bis: ZSK-roll-frequency
Eric Rescorla
2010-01-21
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/lBcRQ9vnSmFwsDXp4Rg9q1K5Qa4/
379514
1131360
[DNSOP] rfc4641bis: ZSK-roll-frequency[DNSOP] rfc4641bis: ZSK-roll-frequency
Olaf Kolkman
2010-01-21
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/wZdTu2gg0ziqkup-Ribk_0kOfmg/
379513
1131360
Re: [dnsext] DNSKEY signatures - dnssec-bis updatesRe: [dnsext] DNSKEY signatures - dnssec-bis updates
W.C.A. Wijngaards
2009-11-13
namedroppers
None
/arch/msg/namedroppers/jxX-tCN_j9zJrlE6qQBL3VN41aM/
1002633
1506203
Re: [dnsext] DNSKEY signatures - dnssec-bis updatesRe: [dnsext] DNSKEY signatures - dnssec-bis updates
W.C.A. Wijngaards
2009-11-13
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/ZCpBxfwwYwxo2jjkuewZJk9qYZo/
364223
1128704
Re: [sidr] sidr-arch-09 refresh cycle timeRe: [sidr] sidr-arch-09 refresh cycle time
Matt Lepinski
2009-11-05
sidr
None
/arch/msg/sidr/eVLQgAVRsDBEB0Lxyoq00Yl26F4/
1296002
1601939
Re: [sidr] sidr-arch-09 refresh cycle timeRe: [sidr] sidr-arch-09 refresh cycle time
Sandra Murphy
2009-11-04
sidr
None
/arch/msg/sidr/B1fd8CdkoNw4e3JE23J4coyh-20/
1295985
1601939
Re: [sidr] sidr-arch-09 refresh cycle timeRe: [sidr] sidr-arch-09 refresh cycle time
Jared Mauch
2009-10-31
sidr
None
/arch/msg/sidr/jtWDRWuWElgF8rsXP8lFGkMvvGk/
1295956
1601939
Re: [sidr] sidr-arch-09 refresh cycle timeRe: [sidr] sidr-arch-09 refresh cycle time
Danny McPherson
2009-10-31
sidr
None
/arch/msg/sidr/oAJ4rsUYROE72Tr4ABdr63GXUh0/
1295955
1601939
Re: [DNSOP] [dnsext] Why ZSK rollover is a Bad Idea (tm)Re: [DNSOP] [dnsext] Why ZSK rollover is a Bad Idea (tm)
Roy Arends
2009-10-07
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/XsFB_DDR_Ph3AsfLlTHUokLjAx8/
379301
1131402