Re: [Emailcore] A problematic MUST NOT (in rfc5321bis)Re: [Emailcore] A problematic MUST NOT (in rfc5321bis)
Dave Crocker
2023-08-16
emailcore
None
/arch/msg/emailcore/Ueu_Ex69Ovg97Ow0GtkySX95BcA/
3343735
2078787
Re: [Emailcore] A problematic MUST NOT (in rfc5321bis)Re: [Emailcore] A problematic MUST NOT (in rfc5321bis)
Peter J. Holzer
2023-08-14
emailcore
None
/arch/msg/emailcore/V8348rU9d2x6vJcHTyHcVtPePaU/
3343024
2078787
Re: [Emailcore] A problematic MUST NOT (in rfc5321bis)Re: [Emailcore] A problematic MUST NOT (in rfc5321bis)
Dave Crocker
2023-08-14
emailcore
None
/arch/msg/emailcore/OmR4cgFGmcTFrhzokFD46NdGYcs/
3343016
2078787
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Third party signaturesRe: [dmarc-ietf] Third party signatures
Douglas Foster
2023-05-16
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/j_SWCu2EKxayw5r5OGXT0FhiWuQ/
3309499
2063669
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Third party signaturesRe: [dmarc-ietf] Third party signatures
Hector Santos
2023-05-16
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/Cgbo6FoBPrwqDvzEukb74uVSd1k/
3309422
2063669
Re: [Ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-chuang-dkim-replay-problemRe: [Ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-chuang-dkim-replay-problem
Wei Chuang
2023-04-02
ietf-dkim
None
/arch/msg/ietf-dkim/TXL8n3AB6YZkVYVvFEz1rcOSl3I/
3295527
2057637
Re: [Ietf-dkim] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-crocker-dkim-replay-00.txtRe: [Ietf-dkim] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-crocker-dkim-replay-00.txt
Wei Chuang
2023-03-13
ietf-dkim
None
/arch/msg/ietf-dkim/CTuL93fEuZNmvyrTdWzSgZ4dCsc/
3286114
2054951
Re: [Ietf-dkim] not removing signaturesRe: [Ietf-dkim] not removing signatures
Alessandro Vesely
2022-12-09
ietf-dkim
None
/arch/msg/ietf-dkim/xtG7PM08VkD4VqyQpOxE7bhL90w/
3256110
2042492
Re: [Emailcore] RFC5322bis - Ensuring uniqueness of Message-IDRe: [Emailcore] RFC5322bis - Ensuring uniqueness of Message-ID
Dave Crocker
2022-10-29
emailcore
None
/arch/msg/emailcore/Rb2Fc0Ctw9UVBxRgRK6AYPPlXQ0/
3242329
2034772
Re: [Bimi] Proposal to Clarify Role of MUA in BIMI EvaluationRe: [Bimi] Proposal to Clarify Role of MUA in BIMI Evaluation
John C Klensin
2022-07-19
bimi
None
/arch/msg/bimi/iFoqUPXQFFSgDCc1Gs3eZwd-KKs/
3201901
2014508
Re: [Bimi] Proposal to Clarify Role of MUA in BIMI EvaluationRe: [Bimi] Proposal to Clarify Role of MUA in BIMI Evaluation
Trent Adams
2022-07-15
bimi
None
/arch/msg/bimi/7cBaH5mQJJeGSVKLlErLhU9ZXcs/
3201100
2014508
Re: [ietf-smtp] Updated draft for "SMTP Response for Detected Spam"Re: [ietf-smtp] Updated draft for "SMTP Response for Detected Spam"
John C Klensin
2022-03-31
ietf-smtp
None
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/vovOLCzBo0DimTPgVSuZlBy0DuY/
3165554
2005728
Re: [ietf-smtp] Updated draft for "SMTP Response for Detected Spam"Re: [ietf-smtp] Updated draft for "SMTP Response for Detected Spam"
Richard Clayton
2022-03-30
ietf-smtp
None
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/f1lKY_CsPEicOh18rn1ArvJiiHY/
3165474
2005728
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #66 (Define What It Means to Have Implemented DMARC) and #62 (Reporting a MUST)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #66 (Define What It Means to Have Implemented DMARC) and #62 (Reporting a MUST)
Todd Herr
2021-08-19
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/6PIl9ixMOWXYEUPY-wtrcnfGRNU/
3066195
1968281
Re: [Emailcore] Ticket #8: Need a registry of header fields that are Ok to add after submissionRe: [Emailcore] Ticket #8: Need a registry of header fields that are Ok to add after submission
Alessandro Vesely
2021-07-26
emailcore
None
/arch/msg/emailcore/xRwikRCN_dW7hXL-8n-og4RwR8M/
3057015
1925900
Re: [Emailcore] Ticket #8: Need a registry of header fields that are Ok to add after submissionRe: [Emailcore] Ticket #8: Need a registry of header fields that are Ok to add after submission
Dave Crocker
2021-07-25
emailcore
None
/arch/msg/emailcore/5HPBXSIXkQyzWh9B3ZyRdeQZ15w/
3056633
1925900
Re: [Emailcore] Ticket #8: Need a registry of header fields that are Ok to add after submissionRe: [Emailcore] Ticket #8: Need a registry of header fields that are Ok to add after submission
Alessandro Vesely
2021-07-25
emailcore
None
/arch/msg/emailcore/vz3U_4rnD_Eix7n6xk5cbVbB8K4/
3056578
1925900
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ratchets - Disallow PCT 1-99Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ratchets - Disallow PCT 1-99
Alessandro Vesely
2021-07-22
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/fIaSfoxAvAHopEQKKVsdCHOEAbE/
3055767
1961536
Re: [Emailcore] submission cleanup, not EHLO domain validationRe: [Emailcore] submission cleanup, not EHLO domain validation
Dave Crocker
2020-10-04
emailcore
None
/arch/msg/emailcore/SEbbwzCFbvHCjenL_A0Y7kf_JFA/
2938471
1915583
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Mediation (was: Re: Header munging, not ARC, can solve the mailing list problem)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Mediation (was: Re: Header munging, not ARC, can solve the mailing list problem)
Brandon Long
2020-06-19
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/Id74kjD2Ke5jbHu4C_7wa_websQ/
2893701
1899353
Re: [dmarc-ietf] MediationRe: [dmarc-ietf] Mediation
Dave Crocker
2020-06-19
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/BygEohJthqtlNrRow590O39aTtE/
2893668
1899353
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Mediation (was: Re: Header munging, not ARC, can solve the mailing list problem)Re: [dmarc-ietf] Mediation (was: Re: Header munging, not ARC, can solve the mailing list problem)
Pete Resnick
2020-06-19
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/7L560VzbZskBqE__Q43zCX2l4cw/
2893647
1899353
[dmarc-ietf] Mediation (was: Re: Header munging, not ARC, can solve the mailing list problem)[dmarc-ietf] Mediation (was: Re: Header munging, not ARC, can solve the mailing list problem)
Dave Crocker
2020-06-19
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/wzSwK1-vKVHAqM0AE7wbVTcSSLA/
2893631
1899353
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Errors in RFC 8601, was Question about changes introduced by erratumRe: [dmarc-ietf] Errors in RFC 8601, was Question about changes introduced by erratum
Damian Lukowski
2020-03-22
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/BPNeCtgdN2UBxAFiKn2Hje2D0r8/
2855847
1886274
Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literalsRe: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals
Dave Crocker
2020-01-01
ietf-smtp
None
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/XprlpAsyspChqrDQYbtfgi3jxX0/
2820973
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Email standard revision, was address maximum lengthRe: [ietf-smtp] Email standard revision, was address maximum length
Dave Crocker
2019-12-02
ietf-smtp
None
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/p6c2r85y1qv6OKgeaw5Vq70UJsc/
2811998
1868668
Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-ietf-dmarc-psd reviewRe: [dmarc-ietf] draft-ietf-dmarc-psd review
Scott Kitterman
2019-08-02
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/FO58qOqe7gdRfhegW8ccbC-ZFx8/
2764796
1850799
Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-ietf-dmarc-psd reviewRe: [dmarc-ietf] draft-ietf-dmarc-psd review
Murray S. Kucherawy
2019-08-01
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/L0EsTjDKYzwwqsxclfKwgx0htGQ/
2763816
1850799
Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-ietf-dmarc-psd reviewRe: [dmarc-ietf] draft-ietf-dmarc-psd review
Stan Kalisch
2019-07-27
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/mCdTL1UgDg3rohav3hkvM02qz-g/
2762093
1850799
Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-ietf-dmarc-psd reviewRe: [dmarc-ietf] draft-ietf-dmarc-psd review
Scott Kitterman
2019-07-27
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/cwrvhRi6IdXPBJnxHeL6OG1w0mQ/
2762074
1850799
[dmarc-ietf] draft-ietf-dmarc-psd review[dmarc-ietf] draft-ietf-dmarc-psd review
Murray S. Kucherawy
2019-07-22
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/8HKHdsXKrxA-goMa02XWiZqlLio/
2758500
1850799
Re: [xml2rfc-dev] <artset> feedbackRe: [xml2rfc-dev] <artset> feedback
Henrik Levkowetz
2019-05-10
xml2rfc-dev
None
/arch/msg/xml2rfc-dev/RHiB_P9Y7wC-VwaaNl4HEK2lPjA/
2729989
1840024
Re: [xml2rfc-dev] <artset> feedbackRe: [xml2rfc-dev] <artset> feedback
Julian Reschke
2019-05-10
xml2rfc-dev
None
/arch/msg/xml2rfc-dev/RVsqlBmmyqJTqksZyUdt_UmYBKE/
2729978
1840024
Re: [xml2rfc-dev] <artset> feedbackRe: [xml2rfc-dev] <artset> feedback
Henrik Levkowetz
2019-05-10
xml2rfc-dev
None
/arch/msg/xml2rfc-dev/UdtvkRWAo6GJBtbFd3U_Sl9vw0Q/
2729960
1840024
Re: [xml2rfc-dev] <artset> feedbackRe: [xml2rfc-dev] <artset> feedback
Julian Reschke
2019-05-10
xml2rfc-dev
None
/arch/msg/xml2rfc-dev/3tEKjDtckkJnAVGI6h-3hdFL1B8/
2729950
1840024
Re: [xml2rfc-dev] <artset> feedbackRe: [xml2rfc-dev] <artset> feedback
Henrik Levkowetz
2019-05-10
xml2rfc-dev
None
/arch/msg/xml2rfc-dev/vucxoWGm_hFSC-CN2bRdDeI7tSo/
2729787
1840024
Re: [xml2rfc-dev] <artset> feedbackRe: [xml2rfc-dev] <artset> feedback
Julian Reschke
2019-05-10
xml2rfc-dev
None
/arch/msg/xml2rfc-dev/A4ib3uy2KQEcQK9pjJ8JX_vIZQI/
2729785
1840024
Re: [Uta] RequireTLS: Revised text on message originationRe: [Uta] RequireTLS: Revised text on message origination
Jim Fenton
2019-04-17
uta
None
/arch/msg/uta/2RXQUPqSrkqb2r6H0EuuQk5aI8E/
2721891
1836856
Re: [Uta] RequireTLS: Revised text on message originationRe: [Uta] RequireTLS: Revised text on message origination
Rolf E. Sonneveld
2019-04-15
uta
None
/arch/msg/uta/YDHZ30_Qtm5Tq4yaza73F1CbB4M/
2721043
1836856
Re: [Jmap] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-jmap-core-12Re: [Jmap] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-jmap-core-12
Ned Freed
2019-01-04
jmap
None
/arch/msg/jmap/Z5vZ4tOykiE_-Hzu_3V8myM_24Y/
2678076
1821616