Re: [auth48] [C470] AUTH48 questions: RFCs 9414-9416Re: [auth48] [C470] AUTH48 questions: RFCs 9414-9416
Alanna Paloma
2023-07-05
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/x-iNdg9cVYdUOMDu2ru4wa4a-0U/
3325059
2066809
Re: [auth48] [C470] AUTH48 questions: RFCs 9414-9416Re: [auth48] [C470] AUTH48 questions: RFCs 9414-9416
Alanna Paloma
2023-06-28
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/jR2nlCZTXnM0sQpVNGQUFex5xVY/
3322558
2066809
Re: [auth48] [C470] AUTH48 questions: RFCs 9414-9416Re: [auth48] [C470] AUTH48 questions: RFCs 9414-9416
Alanna Paloma
2023-06-19
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/2coinZezutjx0z7McfLpsJx399w/
3319613
2066809
Re: [auth48] [C470] AUTH48 questions: RFCs 9414-9416Re: [auth48] [C470] AUTH48 questions: RFCs 9414-9416
Fernando Gont
2023-06-09
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/Bc7imWJJAKJN5VjcbVuDxfkVQP4/
3317085
2066809
Re: [auth48] [C470] AUTH48 questions: RFCs 9414-9416Re: [auth48] [C470] AUTH48 questions: RFCs 9414-9416
Alanna Paloma
2023-06-08
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/1nxHp7uyCjj2oyGymZWUCeHlH8c/
3316916
2066809
Re: [auth48] [Document Shepherd] (Changed to 9414) AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9415 <draft-irtf-pearg-numeric-ids-history-11> for your reviewRe: [auth48] [Document Shepherd] (Changed to 9414) AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9415 <draft-irtf-pearg-numeric-ids-history-11> for your review
Alanna Paloma
2023-06-08
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/kdqBLNgmXybpXOYzsQZnsvzZU9w/
3316908
2066800
Re: [auth48] [C470] AUTH48 questions: RFCs 9414-9416Re: [auth48] [C470] AUTH48 questions: RFCs 9414-9416
Fernando Gont
2023-06-07
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/mWAQY8AWLb1u74bJ7TEYRQUCJcM/
3316195
2066809
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9415 <draft-irtf-pearg-numeric-ids-history-11> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9415 <draft-irtf-pearg-numeric-ids-history-11> for your review
Fernando Gont
2023-06-07
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/LynZFHVI2oXQW6Y5RPPQ5N3UmHE/
3316192
2066800
Re: [auth48] [C470] AUTH48 questions: RFCs 9414-9416Re: [auth48] [C470] AUTH48 questions: RFCs 9414-9416
Fernando Gont
2023-06-07
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/1Ef3WvegfnT5hvAgmdkeYaNeUhs/
3316184
2066809
Re: [auth48] [C470] AUTH48 questions: RFCs 9414-9416Re: [auth48] [C470] AUTH48 questions: RFCs 9414-9416
Fernando Gont
2023-06-02
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/AXdYRWn1ibhZDGeGHOntbzoyBiQ/
3315217
2066809
Re: [auth48] [C470] AUTH48 questions: RFCs 9414-9416Re: [auth48] [C470] AUTH48 questions: RFCs 9414-9416
Alanna Paloma
2023-06-02
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/nWD5iyLr-WVfbqxdsWtbRBCj9fw/
3315189
2066809
[auth48] [C470] AUTH48 questions: RFCs 9414-9416[auth48] [C470] AUTH48 questions: RFCs 9414-9416
rfc-editor
2023-05-26
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/gmco60PhCzT3k5ZHr1JgdD3wRZ4/
3313059
2066809
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9415 <draft-irtf-pearg-numeric-ids-history-11> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9415 <draft-irtf-pearg-numeric-ids-history-11> for your review
rfc-editor
2023-05-26
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/Q20FOKIjNTb7s3tiU_A8A2uh6mo/
3313051
2066800
Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your reviewRe: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your review
Megan Ferguson
2022-11-14
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/7HsNX8mTBULqk-fR5F1RAqVBgtE/
3248444
2031641
Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your reviewRe: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your review
Valery Smyslov
2022-11-10
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/yS-zsHmpz-kN-DK4OGTxypzfVDw/
3247425
2031641
Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your reviewRe: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your review
Valery Smyslov
2022-11-10
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/UgZ2DeIX6UMnhWtDlJdGkhB3sJY/
3246975
2031641
Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your reviewRe: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your review
Megan Ferguson
2022-11-09
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/c3A6c3_QUYHomzcXkZ5GBRfMRRw/
3246866
2031641
Re: [auth48] [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your reviewRe: [auth48] [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your review
Roman Danyliw
2022-10-25
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/mE9Y5J6XVutWb-O0rrfXXZ8tjLw/
3240836
2031641
Re: [auth48] [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your reviewRe: [auth48] [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your review
Valery Smyslov
2022-10-12
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/USRtMZmeQLwIMEU9EySO5wG1oMQ/
3233965
2031641
[auth48] [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your review[auth48] [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your review
Megan Ferguson
2022-10-12
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/wYH5bk0CTM5wSK-dgTd-V3ya5U0/
3233960
2031641
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your review
Valery Smyslov
2022-10-12
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/Tw2Q-2jP1KGhOmPV5JPMCUQy0KA/
3233804
2031641
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your review
Megan Ferguson
2022-10-11
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/Am_K1BeplaMUSA_dItriV3MupaA/
3233548
2031641
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your review
Valery Smyslov
2022-10-11
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/cbIxPBTkHoQcfUQiebFEfiP1guI/
3233337
2031641
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your review
Megan Ferguson
2022-10-10
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/BczeTty9jzkn-QGKGd7o2bszYJI/
3233197
2031641
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your review
Valery Smyslov
2022-10-07
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/4iLAbtf8MXQafjm02wT9iYl2u_Q/
3231859
2031641
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your review
Megan Ferguson
2022-10-06
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/987UuvaJbtNWFCCu2LmW63NQz6w/
3231737
2031641
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your review
Tommy Pauly
2022-10-06
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/7OwJRrPcvAAFm0EcvckHf1TBlzs/
3231451
2031641
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your review
Valery Smyslov
2022-10-06
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/dOkRbZ3UzHsHGrUYBJkd3RAWgEg/
3231259
2031641
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your review
Megan Ferguson
2022-10-04
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/wRd2nkKrptmWnNlfngL8keRXiUI/
3230491
2031641
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your review
Tommy Pauly
2022-10-04
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/AROy6en62tvcnLrJswfRqNnVGcY/
3230033
2031641
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9329 <draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-09> for your review
Valery Smyslov
2022-10-03
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/YbBW9Cc-jeZMFdPuYJOjJuNt9k4/
3229770
2031641
Re: [tcpm] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-25: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)Re: [tcpm] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-25: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Benjamin Kaduk
2022-03-22
tcpm
None
/arch/msg/tcpm/Tz9l_OqAvK8CJz3P0nFHiMJAh3w/
3161449
1972589
Re: [tcpm] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-25: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)Re: [tcpm] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-25: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Scharf, Michael
2022-02-28
tcpm
None
/arch/msg/tcpm/hXulKDOF8w2tDrio_hiCZCDaUNY/
3125646
1972589
Re: [tcpm] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-25: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)Re: [tcpm] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-25: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
touch@strayalpha.com
2022-02-25
tcpm
None
/arch/msg/tcpm/of1_aPBE0MYPIgUGDg2ESbhMj28/
3124993
1972589
Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-06.txt> (Security Considerations for Transient Numeric Identifiers Employed in Network Protocols) to Best Current PracticeRe: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-06.txt> (Security Considerations for Transient Numeric Identifiers Employed in Network Protocols) to Best Current Practice
Paul Wouters
2020-12-31
last-call
None
/arch/msg/last-call/gk0DS8NLbSego4IUjAYHiO2_Yoo/
2979599
1929236
Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-06.txt> (Security Considerations for Transient Numeric Identifiers Employed in Network Protocols) to Best Current PracticeRe: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-06.txt> (Security Considerations for Transient Numeric Identifiers Employed in Network Protocols) to Best Current Practice
Fernando Gont
2020-12-29
last-call
None
/arch/msg/last-call/LvXSWkBlwL91LJTtOQ0E9NQ-MMo/
2979270
1929236
Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-06.txt> (Security Considerations for Transient Numeric Identifiers Employed in Network Protocols) to Best Current PracticeRe: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-06.txt> (Security Considerations for Transient Numeric Identifiers Employed in Network Protocols) to Best Current Practice
Fernando Gont
2020-12-18
last-call
None
/arch/msg/last-call/9uhKCjGL2la3IYjNN8VDT4uxICQ/
2977327
1929236
Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-06.txt> (Security Considerations for Transient Numeric Identifiers Employed in Network Protocols) to Best Current PracticeRe: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-06.txt> (Security Considerations for Transient Numeric Identifiers Employed in Network Protocols) to Best Current Practice
Iván Arce (Quarkslab)
2020-12-18
last-call
None
/arch/msg/last-call/qfpapqnFF8ZEok-esASwpXjEgHY/
2977314
1929236
Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-06.txt> (Security Considerations for Transient Numeric Identifiers Employed in Network Protocols) to Best Current PracticeRe: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-06.txt> (Security Considerations for Transient Numeric Identifiers Employed in Network Protocols) to Best Current Practice
Iván Arce (Quarkslab)
2020-12-15
last-call
None
/arch/msg/last-call/WapkOrCzjCPtvoEooAqE2Zh977w/
2976064
1929236
Re: [tcpm] A few comments on 793bisRe: [tcpm] A few comments on 793bis
Joseph Touch
2020-10-23
tcpm
None
/arch/msg/tcpm/y6Pv3ZPGYx54DYgpl8I0XN0z2ho/
2946191
1919121