Re: [dtn] DTN well-known servicesRe: [dtn] DTN well-known services
Jorge Amodio
2023-05-30
dtn
None
/arch/msg/dtn/3wjgfhbhfLHRxN4yPUMUuCvD2d4/
3313845
2067021
Re: [dtn] DTN well-known servicesRe: [dtn] DTN well-known services
sburleig.sb
2023-05-30
dtn
None
/arch/msg/dtn/e8c7FgoxoUr1XOY4fckgLzUMn8k/
3313831
2067021
Re: [dtn] DTN well-known servicesRe: [dtn] DTN well-known services
Keith Scott
2023-05-30
dtn
None
/arch/msg/dtn/b7tLvK8grJnWc-9l7e0jzYYgKnw/
3313772
2067021
Re: [dtn] DTN well-known servicesRe: [dtn] DTN well-known services
scott
2023-05-30
dtn
None
/arch/msg/dtn/gmt9C9bS9nXHxu9YeNsbQ2F_HaA/
3313745
2067021
Re: [dtn] DTN well-known servicesRe: [dtn] DTN well-known services
Jorge Amodio
2023-05-30
dtn
None
/arch/msg/dtn/1BMf9dm1A_809cLJXhEC49bVRa4/
3313737
2067021
Re: [dtn] DTN well-known servicesRe: [dtn] DTN well-known services
Rick Taylor
2023-05-30
dtn
None
/arch/msg/dtn/TSwEDqRDRlEVtmpaN84iJWf1UuM/
3313704
2067021
Re: [dtn] DTN well-known servicesRe: [dtn] DTN well-known services
Jorge Amodio
2023-05-30
dtn
None
/arch/msg/dtn/yjSGLgbkKMeZrtf-F0UgvF7T06w/
3313650
2067021
Re: [dtn] DTN well-known servicesRe: [dtn] DTN well-known services
Rick Taylor
2023-05-29
dtn
None
/arch/msg/dtn/urCEbnmcKNQdDz_-2TM4d319v-0/
3313626
2067021
Re: [dtn] DTN well-known servicesRe: [dtn] DTN well-known services
scott
2023-05-29
dtn
None
/arch/msg/dtn/vJfpInFF59PKwA7WYPdcZwCe1x0/
3313606
2067021
Re: [dtn] DTN well-known servicesRe: [dtn] DTN well-known services
Keith Scott
2023-05-29
dtn
None
/arch/msg/dtn/YiaNjmBey8skawvdMaMe--_T91E/
3313603
2067021
[dtn] DTN well-known services[dtn] DTN well-known services
Rick Taylor
2023-05-29
dtn
None
/arch/msg/dtn/yIMZbyxi93xhCqTWmIfYPgMjCTQ/
3313579
2067021
Re: [OAUTH-WG] Redefining Confidential and Public ClientsRe: [OAUTH-WG] Redefining Confidential and Public Clients
Jim Willeke
2022-07-27
oauth
None
/arch/msg/oauth/dYNnk0W8Nt4NToLmXJGju4zPRM4/
3205291
2022756
Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Errata Rejected] RFC8176 (6314)Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Errata Rejected] RFC8176 (6314)
Sandy Ginoza
2020-10-20
oauth
None
/arch/msg/oauth/ZN1qwXlp3iWhBOOJ2clOKElInUA/
2944623
1918597
Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Errata Rejected] RFC8176 (6314)Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Errata Rejected] RFC8176 (6314)
Benjamin Kaduk
2020-10-20
oauth
None
/arch/msg/oauth/Y_2viaNGqu9A5z_BtLEV4WHJ3_0/
2944515
1918597
Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Errata Rejected] RFC8176 (6314)Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Errata Rejected] RFC8176 (6314)
David Brossard
2020-10-20
oauth
None
/arch/msg/oauth/YVJ6eXZVPrQTSJoXVy3_M8OK7As/
2944511
1918597
Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Errata Rejected] RFC8176 (6314)Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Errata Rejected] RFC8176 (6314)
Benjamin Kaduk
2020-10-20
oauth
None
/arch/msg/oauth/cK027oXVy4xZj1q39Yp53LX4N5w/
2944510
1918597
[OAUTH-WG] [Errata Rejected] RFC8176 (6314)[OAUTH-WG] [Errata Rejected] RFC8176 (6314)
RFC Errata System
2020-10-20
oauth
None
/arch/msg/oauth/0bc_0P9mdB0bKBuwr19F1JZXxY4/
2944509
1918597
[OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8176 (6314)[OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8176 (6314)
RFC Errata System
2020-10-20
oauth
None
/arch/msg/oauth/fYSbk_vkGGGtXDD5Gye2_RdS8x8/
2944501
1918595
Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]
Joel M. Halpern
2017-10-11
ietf
None
/arch/msg/ietf/fkTS8NhGM4SK4Bgnv2-b6JO-kXQ/
2470217
1733670
Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]
Stewart Bryant
2017-10-11
ietf
None
/arch/msg/ietf/itPezsPmFFqpm7AMzV2wRfWBENo/
2470094
1733670
Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]
Andrew G. Malis
2017-10-10
ietf
None
/arch/msg/ietf/nJAp5debp_UIrHUTL-zbB-mr2fA/
2469759
1733670
Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]
Yoav Nir
2017-10-10
ietf
None
/arch/msg/ietf/w63EPTHSxb8LvDCDsXxMH1xvIGM/
2469725
1733670
Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]
John C Klensin
2017-10-10
ietf
None
/arch/msg/ietf/J_GxEk7LpiQOQunhIYSdf-VXlMg/
2469345
1733670
Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]
Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Edito…
2017-10-09
ietf
None
/arch/msg/ietf/_pSGjIo0_Emy9Sy1BLO4AnOqZMA/
2469231
1733670
Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]
Brian E Carpenter
2017-10-09
ietf
None
/arch/msg/ietf/a2arNwDgrsDeDvP2k7AsdtOG5xw/
2469180
1733670
Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]
John C Klensin
2017-10-09
ietf
None
/arch/msg/ietf/JQyzHMh0y_Gx5ejUSjDWjmqLg20/
2469048
1733670
[OAUTH-WG] Authentication Method Reference Values is now RFC 8176[OAUTH-WG] Authentication Method Reference Values is now RFC 8176
Mike Jones
2017-06-17
oauth
None
/arch/msg/oauth/QgcfAjqnkiU-swUYuU60z3GPnys/
2405587
1709891
[rfc-dist] RFC 8176 on Authentication Method Reference Values[rfc-dist] RFC 8176 on Authentication Method Reference Values
rfc-editor
2017-06-16
rfc-dist
None
/arch/msg/rfc-dist/oyU8nEXZgH6EzgtG1ceHmQ5HsIk/
2405576
1709884
[OAUTH-WG] RFC 8176 on Authentication Method Reference Values[OAUTH-WG] RFC 8176 on Authentication Method Reference Values
rfc-editor
2017-06-16
oauth
None
/arch/msg/oauth/GbLaAO0r-iu5uXMXwy8G_fUvBHU/
2405575
1709883
RFC 8176 on Authentication Method Reference ValuesRFC 8176 on Authentication Method Reference Values
rfc-editor
2017-06-16
ietf-announce
None
/arch/msg/ietf-announce/fxL_U2UzXUjIvVDRcMTJkaGQb8g/
2405577
1709885