Re: [spring] Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?Re: [spring] Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
Xing Li
2020-05-27
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/7BEokFKe4GM-tojNjA7q-YVAuBI/
2884597
1897005
Re: [spring] Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?Re: [spring] Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
Xing Li
2020-05-27
spring
None
/arch/msg/spring/5Vw5a7v8LUx-z10eWg8hjYclBKY/
2884598
1897006
Re: [spring] Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?Re: [spring] Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
Brian E Carpenter
2020-05-27
spring
None
/arch/msg/spring/AUnWWnUH3X0uv0O74NphcQckxSk/
2884526
1897006
Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
Brian E Carpenter
2020-05-27
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/2gjgoqBtkpEd791xt1ZJMVFMgJU/
2884527
1897005
[rfc-dist] RFC 8574 on cite-as: A Link Relation to Convey a Preferred URI for Referencing[rfc-dist] RFC 8574 on cite-as: A Link Relation to Convey a Preferred URI for Referencing
rfc-editor
2019-04-17
rfc-dist
None
/arch/msg/rfc-dist/v7SwNtE1eCyKj7Vy3sSosB3hagQ/
2721604
1837361
RFC 8574 on cite-as: A Link Relation to Convey a Preferred URI for ReferencingRFC 8574 on cite-as: A Link Relation to Convey a Preferred URI for Referencing
rfc-editor
2019-04-17
ietf-announce
None
/arch/msg/ietf-announce/YcPG-2dCHZ_FATM7gSj2Y9wVeRw/
2721603
1837360