IETF Mail List Archives Search Results

Re: [Detnet] Comments regarding draft-malis-detnet-controller-plane-frameworkRe: [Detnet] Comments regarding draft-malis-detnet-controller-plane-framework

Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong)

2020-06-16

detnet

Re: [Detnet] Comments regarding draft-malis-detnet-controller-plane-frameworkRe: [Detnet] Comments regarding draft-malis-detnet-controller-plane-framework

Andrew G. Malis

2020-02-07

detnet

Re: [Detnet] Comments regarding draft-malis-detnet-controller-plane-frameworkRe: [Detnet] Comments regarding draft-malis-detnet-controller-plane-framework

Janos Farkas

2020-02-07

detnet

[IPsec] Preliminary IPsecME minutes[IPsec] Preliminary IPsecME minutes

Tero Kivinen

2019-11-22

ipsec

Re: PIM BFD RFCRe: PIM BFD RFC

Gyan Mishra

2019-10-17

rtg-bfd

Re: [spring] Comments on draft-cheng-spring-mpls-path-segment-01Re: [spring] Comments on draft-cheng-spring-mpls-path-segment-01

Alexander Vainshtein

2018-03-14

spring

[trill] 答复: RE: WG LC for draft-ietf-trill-smart-end-nodes (8/26 to 9/9)- extending WG LC (10/4 to 10/18)//FWD: I-D Action: draft-ietf-trill-smart-endnodes-05.txt[trill] 答复: RE: WG LC for draft-ietf-trill-smart-end-nodes (8/26 to 9/9)- extending WG LC (10/4 to 10/18)//FWD: I-D Action: draft-ietf-trill-smart-endnodes-05.txt

hu.fangwei

2017-02-07

trill

Re: [trill] WG LC for draft-ietf-trill-smart-end-nodes (8/26 to 9/9)- extending WG LC (10/4 to 10/18)//FWD: I-D Action: draft-ietf-trill-smart-endnodes-05.txtRe: [trill] WG LC for draft-ietf-trill-smart-end-nodes (8/26 to 9/9)- extending WG LC (10/4 to 10/18)//FWD: I-D Action: draft-ietf-trill-smart-endnodes-05.txt

Susan Hares

2017-02-07

trill

Re: [trill] WG LC for draft-ietf-trill-smart-end-nodes (8/26 to 9/9)- extending WG LC (10/4 to 10/18)//FWD: I-D Action: draft-ietf-trill-smart-endnodes-05.txtRe: [trill] WG LC for draft-ietf-trill-smart-end-nodes (8/26 to 9/9)- extending WG LC (10/4 to 10/18)//FWD: I-D Action: draft-ietf-trill-smart-endnodes-05.txt

hu.fangwei

2017-02-07

trill

Re: [IPsec] Can Overlay nodes see any difference on how ECMP is used by the underlay in building the IPSec tunnels for a specific time span? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service layer interface?Re: [IPsec] Can Overlay nodes see any difference on how ECMP is used by the underlay in building the IPSec tunnels for a specific time span? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service layer interface?

Xuxiaohu

2016-06-16

ipsec

Re: [I2nsf] Can Overlay nodes see any difference on how ECMP is used by the underlay in building the IPSec tunnels for a specific time span? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service layer interface?Re: [I2nsf] Can Overlay nodes see any difference on how ECMP is used by the underlay in building the IPSec tunnels for a specific time span? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service layer interface?

Xuxiaohu

2016-06-16

i2nsf

Re: [nvo3] Can Overlay nodes see any difference on how ECMP is used by the underlay in building the IPSec tunnels for a specific time span? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service layer interface?Re: [nvo3] Can Overlay nodes see any difference on how ECMP is used by the underlay in building the IPSec tunnels for a specific time span? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service layer interface?

Xuxiaohu

2016-06-16

nvo3

[IPsec] Can Overlay nodes see any difference on how ECMP is used by the underlay in building the IPSec tunnels for a specific time span? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service layer interface?[IPsec] Can Overlay nodes see any difference on how ECMP is used by the underlay in building the IPSec tunnels for a specific time span? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service layer interface?

Linda Dunbar

2016-06-16

ipsec

[I2nsf] Can Overlay nodes see any difference on how ECMP is used by the underlay in building the IPSec tunnels for a specific time span? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service layer interface?[I2nsf] Can Overlay nodes see any difference on how ECMP is used by the underlay in building the IPSec tunnels for a specific time span? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service layer interface?

Linda Dunbar

2016-06-16

i2nsf

[nvo3] Can Overlay nodes see any difference on how ECMP is used by the underlay in building the IPSec tunnels for a specific time span? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service layer interface?[nvo3] Can Overlay nodes see any difference on how ECMP is used by the underlay in building the IPSec tunnels for a specific time span? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service layer interface?

Linda Dunbar

2016-06-16

nvo3

Re: [trill] grammar and spelling corrections -> Advancing draft-eastlake-trill-rfc6327bis-00 to WG draftRe: [trill] grammar and spelling corrections -> Advancing draft-eastlake-trill-rfc6327bis-00 to WG draft

Donald Eastlake

2013-07-10

trill

[trill] grammar and spelling corrections -> Advancing draft-eastlake-trill-rfc6327bis-00 to WG draft[trill] grammar and spelling corrections -> Advancing draft-eastlake-trill-rfc6327bis-00 to WG draft

gayle noble

2013-06-26

trill

RFC 6294 on Survey of Proposed Use Cases for the IPv6 Flow LabelRFC 6294 on Survey of Proposed Use Cases for the IPv6 Flow Label

rfc-editor

2011-06-28

ietf-announce

[rfc-dist] RFC 6294 on Survey of Proposed Use Cases for the IPv6 Flow Label[rfc-dist] RFC 6294 on Survey of Proposed Use Cases for the IPv6 Flow Label

rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org

2011-06-28

rfc-dist

[Fwd: Re: Informational RFC to be: <draft-hu-flow-label-cases-03.txt>][Fwd: Re: Informational RFC to be: <draft-hu-flow-label-cases-03.txt>]

Brian E Carpenter

2011-03-21

ipv6

Re: Informational RFC to be: <draft-hu-flow-label-cases-03.txt>Re: Informational RFC to be: <draft-hu-flow-label-cases-03.txt>

The IESG

2011-03-21

ietf-announce

[dns-dir] FW: PRELIMINARY Agenda and Package for the March 17, 2011 Telechat[dns-dir] FW: PRELIMINARY Agenda and Package for the March 17, 2011 Telechat

Romascanu, Dan (Dan)

2011-03-11

dns-dir

[MIB-DOCTORS] FW: PRELIMINARY Agenda and Package for the March 17, 2011 Telechat[MIB-DOCTORS] FW: PRELIMINARY Agenda and Package for the March 17, 2011 Telechat

Romascanu, Dan (Dan)

2011-03-11

mib-doctors

[AAA-DOCTORS] FW: PRELIMINARY Agenda and Package for the March 17, 2011 Telechat[AAA-DOCTORS] FW: PRELIMINARY Agenda and Package for the March 17, 2011 Telechat

Romascanu, Dan (Dan)

2011-03-11

aaa-doctors

[IESG-AGENDA-DIST] Summarized Agenda for the 2011-03-17 IESG Teleconference[IESG-AGENDA-DIST] Summarized Agenda for the 2011-03-17 IESG Teleconference

IESG Secretary

2011-03-10

iesg-agenda-dist

I-D Action:draft-hu-flow-label-cases-03.txtI-D Action:draft-hu-flow-label-cases-03.txt

Internet-Drafts

2011-02-23

i-d-announce

[rfc-i] RFC citations committee I-D issued[rfc-i] RFC citations committee I-D issued

Julian Reschke

2011-02-11

rfc-interest

[rfc-i] RFC citations committee I-D issued[rfc-i] RFC citations committee I-D issued

Joe Touch

2011-02-10

rfc-interest

[rfc-i] RFC citations committee I-D issued[rfc-i] RFC citations committee I-D issued

Brian E Carpenter

2011-02-10

rfc-interest

[rfc-i] RFC citations committee I-D issued[rfc-i] RFC citations committee I-D issued

Joe Touch

2011-02-10

rfc-interest

[rfc-i] RFC citations committee I-D issued[rfc-i] RFC citations committee I-D issued

Brian E Carpenter

2011-02-10

rfc-interest

Re: Flow Labels: what problem are we solving?Re: Flow Labels: what problem are we solving?

Brian E Carpenter

2011-01-11

ipv6

Re: Psuedo-randomness in flow labels [was Re: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-flow-update-00.txt]]Re: Psuedo-randomness in flow labels [was Re: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-flow-update-00.txt]]

Brian E Carpenter

2011-01-10

ipv6

Re: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-flow-update-00.txt]Re: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-flow-update-00.txt]

Brian E Carpenter

2011-01-10

ipv6

[Fwd: I-D Action:draft-hu-flow-label-cases-02.txt][Fwd: I-D Action:draft-hu-flow-label-cases-02.txt]

Brian E Carpenter

2010-10-01

ipv6

I-D Action:draft-hu-flow-label-cases-02.txtI-D Action:draft-hu-flow-label-cases-02.txt

Internet-Drafts

2010-10-01

i-d-announce

RE: Question for Flow LabelRE: Question for Flow Label

Manfredi, Albert E

2010-09-26

ipv6

Re: Question for Flow LabelRe: Question for Flow Label

Brian E Carpenter

2010-09-25

ipv6

I-D Action:draft-hu-flow-label-cases-01.txtI-D Action:draft-hu-flow-label-cases-01.txt

Internet-Drafts

2010-08-18

i-d-announce

Re: Flow Label: 12 bits mutable and 8 bits immutableRe: Flow Label: 12 bits mutable and 8 bits immutable

Rémi Després

2010-08-10

ipv6

FILTER BY TIME

FILTER BY LIST

FILTER BY FROM