Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fieldsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fields
Brandon Long
2020-06-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/x-JxnmUBDU_pdu9f0bDY7w90sOA/
2886655
1897725
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fieldsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fields
Dave Crocker
2020-06-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/UkNtThMr-MoSFnA0r09dkB3Z7KI/
2886652
1897725
[dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fields[dmarc-ietf] DMARC alignment conflicts with RFC 5322 on the use of the From and Sender header fields
Jesse Thompson
2020-06-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/hmFf-GmHAmS0Vwk9OJ2oYBhRmQU/
2886647
1897725
[dmarc-ietf] dmarc - Update to a Meeting Session Request for IETF 108[dmarc-ietf] dmarc - Update to a Meeting Session Request for IETF 108
IETF Meeting Session Request Tool
2020-05-29
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/7v8lUEV_YyDufQjM_3804pom0ng/
2885370
1897240
[dmarc-ietf] dmarc - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 108[dmarc-ietf] dmarc - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 108
IETF Meeting Session Request Tool
2020-05-29
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/LtChVb6V1hJvKzI91tr3XGNZLiE/
2885369
1897239
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 49: remove normative requirement on policy tag placementRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 49: remove normative requirement on policy tag placement
Alessandro Vesely
2020-05-22
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/LAtSdk_QUvuADqN7JBeNRK_JGcc/
2882432
1895195
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 63: make p=none with no reporting URI invalid?Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 63: make p=none with no reporting URI invalid?
Dotzero
2020-05-22
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/9dxRxowFXlGsTxk8GBDtbt4tf-0/
2882305
1895194
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 49: remove normative requirement on policy tag placementRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 49: remove normative requirement on policy tag placement
Scott Kitterman
2020-05-21
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/git-BUc_QXQ3C38KZZQ1OtNmEIA/
2882277
1895195
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 49: remove normative requirement on policy tag placementRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 49: remove normative requirement on policy tag placement
John R. Levine
2020-05-21
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/CIrBvDSWq67SdKtvE7zBvuh2Zv8/
2882258
1895195
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 49: remove normative requirement on policy tag placementRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 49: remove normative requirement on policy tag placement
Steven M Jones
2020-05-21
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/MOregu-6Rj5hwwp2lclSrptO68w/
2882257
1895195
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 49: remove normative requirement on policy tag placementRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 49: remove normative requirement on policy tag placement
Todd Herr
2020-05-21
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Q1v0cJbFMhh0gmVYt8yHEYu4HSc/
2882249
1895195
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 63: make p=none with no reporting URI invalid?Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 63: make p=none with no reporting URI invalid?
Tim Wicinski
2020-05-21
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/nmu_WGXREo8Ji200BbJ7gNpjyQs/
2882232
1895194
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 49: remove normative requirement on policy tag placementRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 49: remove normative requirement on policy tag placement
Scott Kitterman
2020-05-21
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/B7tPRrwQ2oC1iBdK0OvZ8kGo1zI/
2882221
1895195
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 49: remove normative requirement on policy tag placementRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 49: remove normative requirement on policy tag placement
Tim Wicinski
2020-05-21
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Ffy0YRtyrJWgEbBIlqS6RVlfNec/
2882217
1895195
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?
Alessandro Vesely
2020-05-21
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/VGTEpCY7wGPGIL-l0JPZJkuocI0/
2881989
1895196
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?
Freddie Leeman
2020-05-21
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/orI8w214rW2qnLYUNtVwG4c1xqE/
2881909
1895196
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?
Seth Blank
2020-05-20
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/IsVdgLr9E0dShOk-P5nC90a5ZLU/
2881748
1895196
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?
Scott Kitterman
2020-05-20
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/V8_qTZJwN6xWyrcGAfNPUUBHTGY/
2881699
1895196
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?
Hector Santos
2020-05-20
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/ws58nE1Sbslx1uFJYqqjWcnVI40/
2881696
1895196
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?
Alessandro Vesely
2020-05-20
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/DNHmhGrlXvBLMNmYJ9jQ9j6FqgY/
2881671
1895196
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?
Hector Santos
2020-05-20
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/fRRVCJHwJtiTtyFI6aetbHgle1c/
2881621
1895196
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?
Alessandro Vesely
2020-05-20
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/cfzSv9AvK0WnvL5wsZNeM3MRkxg/
2881611
1895196
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?
Hector Santos
2020-05-20
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/dzabOTyirWKuSgJz0JVGcg9cZfw/
2881606
1895196
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?
Hector Santos
2020-05-20
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/7UVjTWeItmh4VBtcemckF4U9ZvY/
2881599
1895196
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?
Benny Pedersen
2020-05-20
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/RxRwX8rbABhJJ7zgHrVypJlRGpQ/
2881578
1895196
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?
Hector Santos
2020-05-20
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/BqMja-0kxwoybq8nTiKKuMyIlt0/
2881577
1895196
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?
Dave Crocker
2020-05-20
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/K_zrCJv04-Pp0tkuRbSMPpsVL5o/
2881573
1895196
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?
Kurt Andersen (b)
2020-05-20
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/6MDVeXJtPxLXe8jz1DBK1PikzIw/
2881562
1895196
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?
Scott Kitterman
2020-05-20
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/cZ4vfSrbEmf0o584Evy4tJLnAQo/
2881519
1895196
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?
Hector Santos
2020-05-20
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/4u5JsGVuVEqNXu6b6fi1uGTqlyQ/
2881500
1895196
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?
Scott Kitterman
2020-05-20
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/qM-3mIkR0vPSzuZwiVk__0F9aXs/
2881344
1895196
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?
Hector Santos
2020-05-20
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/TqjjuEtR2sv3gUmbf0Q1ZFd4OiE/
2881328
1895196
Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc.ietf.org does not fail dmarcRe: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc.ietf.org does not fail dmarc
Benny Pedersen
2020-05-19
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/oOTf0__IIsItIEhuKO0sWU0WraI/
2881164
1895302
Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc.ietf.org failed dmarcRe: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc.ietf.org failed dmarc
Benny Pedersen
2020-05-19
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/SDRqBoxtzJW0ha8tjX5eM05sToA/
2881001
1895302
Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc.ietf.org failed dmarcRe: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc.ietf.org failed dmarc
Alessandro Vesely
2020-05-19
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Qhw_0VLBm7rhZFO3jFUdPoNoU4w/
2880970
1895302
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 69: add JSON reporting format?
Seth Blank
2020-05-19
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/0XpgpL2-4eMCB1FQhZ7AritrAQo/
2880841
1895196
Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc.ietf.org failed dmarcRe: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc.ietf.org failed dmarc
John Levine
2020-05-19
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/kbTw4R0W4rAPaSLTQv9JJZO74xE/
2880840
1895302
Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc.ietf.org failed dmarcRe: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc.ietf.org failed dmarc
Douglas E. Foster
2020-05-18
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/li9tfqXB_IYFZ9oRjDMtoR4sT50/
2880813
1895302
Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc.ietf.org failed dmarcRe: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc.ietf.org failed dmarc
Benny Pedersen
2020-05-18
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/TVXjW9fGjl2-OJe_9zucpELxdyk/
2880775
1895302
Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc.ietf.org failed dmarcRe: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc.ietf.org failed dmarc
John Levine
2020-05-18
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/MECFS_Ifbk_-flLvF2cE6FGQtLo/
2880767
1895302