Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence: Another no protocol change solutionRe: [dnsext] Name equivalence: Another no protocol change solution
Niall O'Reilly
2010-09-13
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/MdiQTUQe1vYNHM9OBPuzI4iS-eE/
368460
1127855
Re: [dnsext] DNAME with exceptions - work-around foundRe: [dnsext] DNAME with exceptions - work-around found
Andrew Sullivan
2010-09-13
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/u8fzglC3Id03P0hjQNNY5dUK8xo/
368459
1127850
Re: [dnsext] DNAME with exceptions - work-around foundRe: [dnsext] DNAME with exceptions - work-around found
Niall O'Reilly
2010-09-13
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/xCIaBU7RIgILonp4jI6TGxBpoaI/
368458
1127850
Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence: Another no protocol change solutionRe: [dnsext] Name equivalence: Another no protocol change solution
Alex Bligh
2010-09-13
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/lBwla8Byc_L3Y-4jfcztLQC4-pA/
368457
1127855
Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence: Another no protocol change solutionRe: [dnsext] Name equivalence: Another no protocol change solution
Niall O'Reilly
2010-09-13
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/xFJeMFvhVIWvPov4R1oGuhJ7JkY/
368456
1127855
Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence: Another no protocol change solutionRe: [dnsext] Name equivalence: Another no protocol change solution
Alex Bligh
2010-09-13
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/9_7tbdAeu5hjzhHR_MpQX2snlsc/
368455
1127855
Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence: Another no protocol change solutionRe: [dnsext] Name equivalence: Another no protocol change solution
Niall O'Reilly
2010-09-13
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/dG9WHY4gIquWNP_TyVNo_Wv--VM/
368454
1127855
Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence: No protocol change solutionRe: [dnsext] Name equivalence: No protocol change solution
fujiwara
2010-09-13
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/zigHneJLR1EPYjbOgYD3ADqRqDc/
368453
1127856
Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence: No protocol change solutionRe: [dnsext] Name equivalence: No protocol change solution
fujiwara
2010-09-13
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/Pn4kx8fEyYFCpBstPGet3OeuwLs/
368452
1127856
Re: [dnsext] RFC 2142 and "organization's top level domain"Re: [dnsext] RFC 2142 and "organization's top level domain"
Florian Weimer
2010-09-13
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/WKbjnymC75ePqRcpGKpvxWlMtq8/
368451
1127849
Re: [dnsext] DNAME with exceptions - work-around foundRe: [dnsext] DNAME with exceptions - work-around found
W.C.A. Wijngaards
2010-09-13
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/ftNi0Y3FO0P_43YdYzBvqvQg10Y/
368450
1127850
Re: [dnsext] DNAME with exceptions - work-around foundRe: [dnsext] DNAME with exceptions - work-around found
Brian Dickson
2010-09-12
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/3j8pn_GRRL7ebYJ4nOMahSHQVyY/
368449
1127850
Re: [dnsext] DNAME with exceptions - work-around foundRe: [dnsext] DNAME with exceptions - work-around found
W.C.A. Wijngaards
2010-09-11
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/rEqtcqPnHG6t2e2zmyaoeBXjKnc/
368448
1127850
Re: [dnsext] RFC 2142 and "organization's top level domain"Re: [dnsext] RFC 2142 and "organization's top level domain"
Dave CROCKER
2010-09-11
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/0kLzdcMSx_YuHmJQmz_6WH_5dko/
368447
1127849
Re: [dnsext] RFC 2142 and "organization's top level domain"Re: [dnsext] RFC 2142 and "organization's top level domain"
Brian Dickson
2010-09-11
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/2n-Q68rUqpJJSNLUcLu_cVEksq0/
368446
1127849
[dnsext] RFC 2142 and "organization's top level domain"[dnsext] RFC 2142 and "organization's top level domain"
Dave CROCKER
2010-09-11
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/alV2WjMjIrFfelDYDldWyeN0joM/
368445
1127849
[dnsext] DNAME with exceptions - work-around found[dnsext] DNAME with exceptions - work-around found
Brian Dickson
2010-09-10
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/Rkv0Pqt7pT_CZucRKIFbll6-Ays/
368444
1127850
Re: [dnsext] Status of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-alg-allocationRe: [dnsext] Status of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-alg-allocation
Olafur Gudmundsson
2010-09-10
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/3z6gTqExCBD6dSuzrmaJQUt8Jzw/
368443
1127851
[dnsext] Status of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-alg-allocation[dnsext] Status of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-alg-allocation
Stephane Bortzmeyer
2010-09-10
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/47lnVWIscITKW4QpR4cYXtHlL4I/
368442
1127851
[dnsext] Name equivalence: why some protocol change is needed[dnsext] Name equivalence: why some protocol change is needed
Brian Dickson
2010-09-10
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/Y1DWMla0EBZKlZIGoYhMpJRc4Yw/
368441
1127852
[dnsext] Name equivalence tricks - tools for building solutions[dnsext] Name equivalence tricks - tools for building solutions
Brian Dickson
2010-09-10
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/KVqATb3seZnjWoN0Q4wBz_FDGbc/
368440
1127853
[dnsext] Re: [keyassure] IANA Registry for DNSSEC Digest types?[dnsext] Re: [keyassure] IANA Registry for DNSSEC Digest types?
Tony Finch
2010-09-09
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/6WBCvv9Hrm2BXjNKJZJU2i5tAR0/
368439
1127854
[dnsext] Re: [keyassure] IANA Registry for DNSSEC Digest types?[dnsext] Re: [keyassure] IANA Registry for DNSSEC Digest types?
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2010-09-09
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/qDehuNwUeaewFffzswbeDhVCB4s/
368438
1127854
[dnsext] IANA Registry for DNSSEC Digest types?[dnsext] IANA Registry for DNSSEC Digest types?
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2010-09-09
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/ioZe2qMDhjKgJ2z13_CU3yENK3A/
368437
1127854
[dnsext] Name equivalence: Another no protocol change solution[dnsext] Name equivalence: Another no protocol change solution
Alex Bligh
2010-09-09
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/bDrypi2kzUk1se52RKUWYFikR9c/
368436
1127855
Re: [dnsext] Name equivalence: No protocol change solutionRe: [dnsext] Name equivalence: No protocol change solution
Alex Bligh
2010-09-09
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/exujIx21dD-tiJImEfkfKBvOsMY/
368435
1127856
[dnsext] Name equivalence: No protocol change solution[dnsext] Name equivalence: No protocol change solution
Kazunori Fujiwara
2010-09-09
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/3v-Qm0LYrl6la6TCQbmyALc_mj4/
368434
1127856
Re: [dnsext] Mixed labels (Re: A next step?)Re: [dnsext] Mixed labels (Re: A next step?)
Ted Hardie
2010-09-09
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/N2iRyJpGkAj1-gwrPrik8zX-QlY/
368433
1127914
Re: [dnsext] Mixed labels (Re: A next step?)Re: [dnsext] Mixed labels (Re: A next step?)
Masataka Ohta
2010-09-08
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/_jtsa-bgWPgmBYtg7AhzXEz3XpM/
368432
1127914
Re: [dnsext] Re: MSIG proposal (on-the-fly sigs for ordinary records) Was: DNSSECis hard to get rightRe: [dnsext] Re: MSIG proposal (on-the-fly sigs for ordinary records) Was: DNSSECis hard to get right
Jeffrey A. Williams
2010-09-08
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/6alsSX--J1w0I6JQUWRObCSKuBc/
368431
1127858
Re: [dnsext] Mixed labels (Re: A next step?)Re: [dnsext] Mixed labels (Re: A next step?)
Harald Alvestrand
2010-09-08
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/QZ-ZMmegzfqfp7WOZ_m0M02CDbw/
368430
1127914
Re: [dnsext] Mixed labels (Re: A next step?)Re: [dnsext] Mixed labels (Re: A next step?)
Ted Hardie
2010-09-08
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/g278NJxUtX-DXSzAoWaaRubYunE/
368429
1127914
[dnsext] Call for Papers: Securing and Trusting Internet Names, SATIN 2011[dnsext] Call for Papers: Securing and Trusting Internet Names, SATIN 2011
Richard Clayton
2010-09-08
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/UoGke20QTiCx0znI0AkssnASfhg/
368428
1127857
Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT charter and treating DNS names as "the same"Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT charter and treating DNS names as "the same"
W.C.A. Wijngaards
2010-09-08
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/rVSunHnkeCV-LqD7xTufk8F5PK8/
368427
1127914
Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT charter and treating DNS names as "the same"Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT charter and treating DNS names as "the same"
Andrew Sullivan
2010-09-08
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/dxGR5uDxZDiBY9kNuUPJ8_26WCA/
368426
1127914
[dnsext] Mixed labels (Re: A next step?)[dnsext] Mixed labels (Re: A next step?)
Harald Alvestrand
2010-09-08
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/DHYptPe7Ie31nqOgGFmngaWV9k8/
368425
1127914
Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT charter and treating DNS names as "the same"Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT charter and treating DNS names as "the same"
Paul Vixie
2010-09-08
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/cKjTKRHxff4j9OjEKhQzLfID6Ew/
368424
1127914
Re: [dnsext] Re: MSIG proposal (on-the-fly sigs for ordinary records) Was: DNSSECis hard to get rightRe: [dnsext] Re: MSIG proposal (on-the-fly sigs for ordinary records) Was: DNSSECis hard to get right
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2010-09-08
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/AM0BH9XasA4-sH5dyZIwBeaWycQ/
368423
1127858
Re: [dnsext] Re: MSIG proposal (on-the-fly sigs for ordinary records) Was: DNSSECis hard to get rightRe: [dnsext] Re: MSIG proposal (on-the-fly sigs for ordinary records) Was: DNSSECis hard to get right
Jiankang YAO
2010-09-08
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/t4Xmv_am4YgqjqBMZHbXjTgR_do/
368422
1127858
Re: [dnsext] Re: MSIG proposal (on-the-fly sigs for ordinary records) Was: DNSSECis hard to get rightRe: [dnsext] Re: MSIG proposal (on-the-fly sigs for ordinary records) Was: DNSSECis hard to get right
Jeffrey A. Williams
2010-09-07
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/v4LlgJK-uXRjmF_A7fh0NJu33k4/
368421
1127858