Re: [dnsext] Increasing character limit for registration in internet domain names: 76 or 68 or 91 or 83 or 64 higher the betterRe: [dnsext] Increasing character limit for registration in internet domain names: 76 or 68 or 91 or 83 or 64 higher the better
Mark Andrews
2011-01-18
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/NY2b4B_pA673gMKQDw_VnbRnrQw/
369102
1127763
Re: [dnsext] Increasing character limit for registration in internet domain names: 76 or 68 or 91 or 83 or 64 higher the betterRe: [dnsext] Increasing character limit for registration in internet domain names: 76 or 68 or 91 or 83 or 64 higher the better
Brian Dickson
2011-01-18
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/bXp-5kXcbEFc8Qi5YR0S-_-w65c/
369101
1127763
Re: [dnsext] Current status of SRV prefix registryRe: [dnsext] Current status of SRV prefix registry
Olafur Gudmundsson
2011-01-18
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/SQ9cQ1cD4uiEE7YfO95VYqF9f6s/
369100
1127760
Re: [dnsext] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-cheshire-dnsext-special-names-01.txt> (Special-Use Domain Names) to Proposed StandardRe: [dnsext] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-cheshire-dnsext-special-names-01.txt> (Special-Use Domain Names) to Proposed Standard
John Levine
2011-01-18
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/Ntlp4QASqRdM465H_i3QcUno_qs/
369099
1127761
Re: [dnsext] Current status of SRV prefix registryRe: [dnsext] Current status of SRV prefix registry
John Levine
2011-01-18
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/BMs0dMxhV9_wuJBXOGldWl5TlGo/
369098
1127760
[dnsext] Current status of SRV prefix registry[dnsext] Current status of SRV prefix registry
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2011-01-18
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/qbfsHNeWiP4QwaGN2ZKA0YChVFs/
369097
1127760
Re: [dnsext] Increasing character limit for registration in internet domain names: 76 or 68 or 91 or 83 or 64 higher the betterRe: [dnsext] Increasing character limit for registration in internet domain names: 76 or 68 or 91 or 83 or 64 higher the better
Olafur Gudmundsson
2011-01-18
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/4ptYsW5xUDBlovXeuSK6l5iavPQ/
369096
1127763
Re: [dnsext] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-cheshire-dnsext-special-names-01.txt> (Special-Use Domain Names) to Proposed StandardRe: [dnsext] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-cheshire-dnsext-special-names-01.txt> (Special-Use Domain Names) to Proposed Standard
Joe Abley
2011-01-18
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/PZZtEvQr5oVQMKxzZJjk8l2w4zM/
369095
1127761
Re: [dnsext] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-cheshire-dnsext-special-names-01.txt> (Special-Use Domain Names) to Proposed StandardRe: [dnsext] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-cheshire-dnsext-special-names-01.txt> (Special-Use Domain Names) to Proposed Standard
Florian Weimer
2011-01-18
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/BFOctkcBAk5suox0DVzTSkhq068/
369094
1127761
Re: [dnsext] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-cheshire-dnsext-special-names-01.txt> (Special-Use Domain Names) to Proposed StandardRe: [dnsext] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-cheshire-dnsext-special-names-01.txt> (Special-Use Domain Names) to Proposed Standard
Joe Abley
2011-01-18
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/NJId4CFKue5CxYjyheLapUcStSE/
369093
1127761
Re: [dnsext] Increasing character limit for registration in internet domain names: 76 or 68 or 91 or 83 or 64 higher the betterRe: [dnsext] Increasing character limit for registration in internet domain names: 76 or 68 or 91 or 83 or 64 higher the better
Florian Weimer
2011-01-18
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/zlVpEK-KRlB-5Fvi-B8umCaDFC8/
369092
1127763
Re: [dnsext] Increasing character limit for registration in internet domain names: 76 or 68 or 91 or 83 or 64 higher the betterRe: [dnsext] Increasing character limit for registration in internet domain names: 76 or 68 or 91 or 83 or 64 higher the better
Paul Vixie
2011-01-18
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/ExgjQx9ZM3W_e2eQpiL9TEcyehI/
369091
1127763
Re: [dnsext] Increasing character limit for registration in internet domain names: 76 or 68 or 91 or 83 or 64 higher the betterRe: [dnsext] Increasing character limit for registration in internet domain names: 76 or 68 or 91 or 83 or 64 higher the better
Florian Weimer
2011-01-18
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/ucPhOiemppVrgc6I_J5aDl3wk_s/
369089
1127763
[dnsext] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-cheshire-dnsext-special-names-01.txt> (Special-Use Domain Names) to Proposed Standard[dnsext] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-cheshire-dnsext-special-names-01.txt> (Special-Use Domain Names) to Proposed Standard
Ralph Droms
2011-01-18
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/T2uDnEWi-C9uOICj0CaiiXNh9pU/
369090
1127761
Re: [dnsext] Moving policy data away from DNSRe: [dnsext] Moving policy data away from DNS
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2011-01-17
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/mln9GgOTCK0e6WbAACa1F_o5ZqA/
369088
1127772
Re: [dnsext] Moving policy data away from DNSRe: [dnsext] Moving policy data away from DNS
Jay Daley
2011-01-17
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/OfQcgbVySIC3T30M_qg_-oB0lj8/
369087
1127772
[dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-5395bis-03.txt[dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-5395bis-03.txt
Internet-Drafts
2011-01-16
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/z0VNwYwYOw5CwOXcKGOHaB4pqxg/
369086
1127762
Re: [dnsext] Increasing character limit for registration in internet domain names: 76 or 68 or 91 or 83 or 64 higher the betterRe: [dnsext] Increasing character limit for registration in internet domain names: 76 or 68 or 91 or 83 or 64 higher the better
Matthew Dempsky
2011-01-15
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/Ep_CpFUlSBkgumbZ-cfwDcAgdbw/
369085
1127763
[dnsext] Increasing character limit for registration in internet domain names: 76 or 68 or 91 or 83 or 64 higher the better[dnsext] Increasing character limit for registration in internet domain names: 76 or 68 or 91 or 83 or 64 higher the better
Krishna Birth
2011-01-14
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/PPDht7hznxvj_tJTdnd3NYXVhMA/
369084
1127763
Re: [dnsext] Additional section processing for DNAME - question for WGRe: [dnsext] Additional section processing for DNAME - question for WG
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
2011-01-12
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/etYiI6PTrHpno-kZrXCiwlYXNMM/
369083
1127765
[dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-ecdsa-00.txt[dnsext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsext-ecdsa-00.txt
Internet-Drafts
2011-01-12
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/srm_GA7BSo-7Dc2VbER-6pX1UK0/
369082
1127764
[dnsext] Additional section processing for DNAME - question for WG[dnsext] Additional section processing for DNAME - question for WG
Rose, Scott W.
2011-01-12
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/sGmj7_DOhfupFreyfm57ffqDiQ8/
369081
1127765
Re: [dnsext] additional section processing for DNAMERe: [dnsext] additional section processing for DNAME
Andreas Gustafsson
2011-01-12
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/CuCjjnEUcJL-yx6Jztm9sprZ1AU/
369080
1127765
Re: [dnsext] additional section processing for DNAMERe: [dnsext] additional section processing for DNAME
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
2011-01-12
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/iZ8tY_mLRqp_a0hoJ-3zBCGH8p0/
369079
1127765
Re: [dnsext] additional section processing for DNAMERe: [dnsext] additional section processing for DNAME
Edward Lewis
2011-01-12
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/Ts81L9-OSxL6tCoX8nl-qaO8Gss/
369078
1127765
Re: [dnsext] additional section processing for DNAMERe: [dnsext] additional section processing for DNAME
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
2011-01-11
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/a2jwL6NdKHbg0P9Ed2pPFFOb_bE/
369077
1127765
Re: [dnsext] additional section processing for DNAMERe: [dnsext] additional section processing for DNAME
Edward Lewis
2011-01-10
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/Kk8Zq2kgp6Tr938bJoACZ06FQqQ/
369076
1127765
Re: [dnsext] additional section processing for DNAMERe: [dnsext] additional section processing for DNAME
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
2011-01-08
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/TBRTDDI5PSy7tpn_DlIzw9j65gU/
369075
1127765
Re: [dnsext] additional section processing for DNAMERe: [dnsext] additional section processing for DNAME
W.C.A. Wijngaards
2011-01-08
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/3XykvqXYZWkqORHWxHIVCVOputY/
369074
1127765
[dnsext] additional section processing for DNAME[dnsext] additional section processing for DNAME
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
2011-01-07
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/ew1_WQvbiNfBGNKhsofRjG2zMR8/
369073
1127765
Re: [dnsext] strngths, was Re: Adopting draft:...Re: [dnsext] strngths, was Re: Adopting draft:...
Colm MacCárthaigh
2011-01-07
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/-6mh9ZJOeeGEMfPCXiZzATwvYCg/
369072
1127779
Re: [dnsext] Adopting draft: draft-hoffman-dnssec-ecdsa-04.txtRe: [dnsext] Adopting draft: draft-hoffman-dnssec-ecdsa-04.txt
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2011-01-07
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/pWBtRyP42TNI29myeUve8VevPJQ/
369071
1127779
Re: [dnsext] Adopting draft: draft-hoffman-dnssec-ecdsa-04.txtRe: [dnsext] Adopting draft: draft-hoffman-dnssec-ecdsa-04.txt
Paul Hoffman
2011-01-07
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/Wmk7c4_Iag8t-L57YkkAEMI4l18/
369070
1127779
Re: [dnsext] Adopting draft: draft-hoffman-dnssec-ecdsa-04.txtRe: [dnsext] Adopting draft: draft-hoffman-dnssec-ecdsa-04.txt
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2011-01-07
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/FXQH44k8KG-MCFDxrLp971zTP4c/
369069
1127779
Re: [dnsext] Adopting draft: draft-hoffman-dnssec-ecdsa-04.txtRe: [dnsext] Adopting draft: draft-hoffman-dnssec-ecdsa-04.txt
Alex Bligh
2011-01-07
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/9j7-ZVmUtY6zUibY8zziNG9X-I4/
369068
1127779
Re: [dnsext] Adopting draft: draft-hoffman-dnssec-ecdsa-04.txtRe: [dnsext] Adopting draft: draft-hoffman-dnssec-ecdsa-04.txt
Florian Weimer
2011-01-07
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/HkJ1nbxeSkOZVB8heaxNrLIeeW4/
369067
1127779
Re: [dnsext] Adopting draft: draft-hoffman-dnssec-ecdsa-04.txtRe: [dnsext] Adopting draft: draft-hoffman-dnssec-ecdsa-04.txt
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2011-01-07
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/UPNv0qeiGXABTvmLQv4itmk7yDE/
369066
1127779
Re: [dnsext] strngths, was Re: Adopting draft:...Re: [dnsext] strngths, was Re: Adopting draft:...
Florian Weimer
2011-01-07
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/E2Zvw-NpRaa9g8WjgHAdT6qLhoE/
369065
1127779
Re: [dnsext] WG Action: RECHARTER: DNS Extensions (dnsext)Re: [dnsext] WG Action: RECHARTER: DNS Extensions (dnsext)
Ray Bellis
2011-01-07
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/vaAlORlxiHr_80YLyBCjDcd2nzM/
369064
1127731
Re: [dnsext] WG Action: RECHARTER: DNS Extensions (dnsext)Re: [dnsext] WG Action: RECHARTER: DNS Extensions (dnsext)
Ray Bellis
2011-01-06
dnsext
/arch/msg/dnsext/ke2hp-jpd7Kr5p2o7hEYqei19bQ/
369063
1127731