Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case?Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case?
Cory Benfield
2017-01-25
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/yQpmbuBQHD1Ilfk4PFPMsjSFTQg/
2320650
1683773
Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case?Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case?
Kazu Yamamoto ( 山本和彦 )
2017-01-25
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/fdVhUhrcbEQM01xv8gDm6JxF3Ho/
2320572
1683773
Re: Proposed text for erratum on PRIORITY in RFC 7540Re: Proposed text for erratum on PRIORITY in RFC 7540
Scott Mitchell
2017-01-25
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/W8vd_GBUx4LpL3Dx8CYeQQarEPs/
2320556
1683462
Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case?Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case?
Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa
2017-01-25
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/9ZLUEYiNYqSx_9t_ttPtPMI-3P8/
2320531
1683773
Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case?Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case?
Kazuho Oku
2017-01-25
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/tDEiKHkFLdU9cSNZoi6oT20pOoM/
2320530
1683773
Re: Proposed text for erratum on PRIORITY in RFC 7540Re: Proposed text for erratum on PRIORITY in RFC 7540
Patrick McManus
2017-01-25
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/QbaBz69yFbEJZwkXWm-qOfwXtVI/
2320485
1683462
Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case?Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case?
Patrick McManus
2017-01-24
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/um6sdQyKMHRBpFJoDMhw7ZOu27k/
2320445
1683773
Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case?Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case?
Tom Bergan
2017-01-24
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/S2TcpMfFRZqTbT2_rXOy84za3-E/
2320442
1683773
Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case?Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case?
Kazu Yamamoto ( 山本和彦 )
2017-01-24
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/Ptdctejw8MdomuceUMy91XHwNJ8/
2320439
1683773
Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case?Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case?
Tom Bergan
2017-01-24
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/9qi7ARAIEFtoZOy_9DM2dIw0IaY/
2320426
1683773
[ietf-http-wg] <none>[ietf-http-wg] <none>
geronimotita
2017-01-24
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/D-KgvdLFOC1bFJIvINAuKzkdatk/
2320397
1683894
Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case?Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case?
Stefan Eissing
2017-01-24
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/jCGsqO4W2FVXiNl7enPxbjQY-eI/
2320142
1683773
Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case?Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case?
Kazu Yamamoto ( 山本和彦 )
2017-01-24
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/dz_yiNjZYAbxUm-bqgVSpREodaE/
2320133
1683773
Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case?Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case?
Kazuho Oku
2017-01-24
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/L_nMfAxqte0fGgTcz9ULXGb-HVg/
2320129
1683773
Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case?Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case?
Tom Bergan
2017-01-24
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/lC5BBoR9uOdvD9Va9_738v74KDg/
2319972
1683773
RE: aes128gcm: why verify padding?RE: aes128gcm: why verify padding?
Manger, James
2017-01-24
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/ZKf6nHzqf_SXjzElTZyDCgn99Jw/
2319967
1682785
Re: aes128gcm: why verify padding?Re: aes128gcm: why verify padding?
Martin Thomson
2017-01-23
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/LoFusOqK4K0o1xqqSlQFbSKLFGk/
2319963
1682785
Re: aes128gcm: vulnerable to truncation attacksRe: aes128gcm: vulnerable to truncation attacks
Martin Thomson
2017-01-23
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/xw9UcshUa12yfo4XFkmgjRZIug0/
2319961
1683672
Re: Proposed text for erratum on PRIORITY in RFC 7540Re: Proposed text for erratum on PRIORITY in RFC 7540
Martin Thomson
2017-01-23
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/tRLJ6wA6_ixVIeQDd-g476nJLCs/
2319962
1683462
RE: aes128gcm: why verify padding?RE: aes128gcm: why verify padding?
Manger, James
2017-01-23
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/wTBL7rieUI_qMvV_vfdMQQfTRkY/
2319706
1682785
Re: aes128gcm: why verify padding?Re: aes128gcm: why verify padding?
Ilari Liusvaara
2017-01-23
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/i1HsB8P_v61G3Hrw2ugEvpN0jVo/
2319614
1682785
RE: aes128gcm: why verify padding?RE: aes128gcm: why verify padding?
Manger, James
2017-01-23
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/aqqLlRkh6kgGk2J3uvvUn7Fs7-g/
2319586
1682785
aes128gcm: vulnerable to truncation attacksaes128gcm: vulnerable to truncation attacks
Manger, James
2017-01-23
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/I9zNgmBbb0qsRmqegHUuWfeSDbw/
2319579
1683672
Re: Clarify some handling about extension frame and unknown frame on HTTP/2Re: Clarify some handling about extension frame and unknown frame on HTTP/2
蕭雋涵
2017-01-22
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/IBFnbNRkr5bokPnb70bdqBl_g8M/
2319473
1683598
Re: Clarify some handling about extension frame and unknown frame on HTTP/2Re: Clarify some handling about extension frame and unknown frame on HTTP/2
Cory Benfield
2017-01-21
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/_GlWLVsknSGctHBDy7hSqyxkaYI/
2319415
1683598
(重要邮件)必看(重要邮件)必看
m-showroom(admin)
2017-01-21
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/dcamVzEbDABq_sTcQslqHrrWwkU/
2319409
1683604
Re: Clarify some handling about extension frame and unknown frame on HTTP/2Re: Clarify some handling about extension frame and unknown frame on HTTP/2
Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa
2017-01-21
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/829RK1jVODnfj9jZ_lQIk7jCwFA/
2319393
1683598
Clarify some handling about extension frame and unknown frame on HTTP/2Clarify some handling about extension frame and unknown frame on HTTP/2
蕭雋涵
2017-01-21
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/EE3dGVsBDLNmO84c9dWZHbsfb6A/
2319385
1683598
Re: Stream State and PRIORITY FramesRe: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames
Scott Mitchell
2017-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/Vw47JsuITdEzpbja2TPJGhUPGv0/
2319267
1682918
Re: Stream State and PRIORITY FramesRe: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames
Tom Bergan
2017-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/grXhAEiB6ssOWQZtgnw_Ghpm2GY/
2319238
1682918
Re: Proposed text for erratum on PRIORITY in RFC 7540Re: Proposed text for erratum on PRIORITY in RFC 7540
Scott Mitchell
2017-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/WMQhxywnESdLruXSVDPQH9pyPNg/
2319212
1683462
Re: Stream State and PRIORITY FramesRe: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames
Scott Mitchell
2017-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/zjL-aJvqWffyYNlX7Db4dV36ejA/
2319202
1682918
Re: Proposed text for erratum on PRIORITY in RFC 7540Re: Proposed text for erratum on PRIORITY in RFC 7540
laike9m
2017-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/avBtrCnbC0IlavQ-uH1SnAUnIVY/
2319137
1683462
Re: Proposed text for erratum on PRIORITY in RFC 7540Re: Proposed text for erratum on PRIORITY in RFC 7540
Cory Benfield
2017-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/jhLywpZVN_vYN3Z88Op739wgb-I/
2319129
1683462
Re: Stream State and PRIORITY FramesRe: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames
laike9m
2017-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/efib6l5dAbykZ15OVvtLQzod6mM/
2319123
1682918
Re: Shared Dictionaries (SDCH and friends)Re: Shared Dictionaries (SDCH and friends)
Martin Thomson
2017-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/Qk6zZxCq1-mlHfixEos-whH87iQ/
2318992
1683461
Proposed text for erratum on PRIORITY in RFC 7540Proposed text for erratum on PRIORITY in RFC 7540
Martin Thomson
2017-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/R44MNYVelDEVZepfnR6_WvkL6ko/
2318989
1683462
Shared Dictionaries (SDCH and friends)Shared Dictionaries (SDCH and friends)
chaals
2017-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/1iEP-O946yKrmUaws7ecGuvi6Rs/
2318988
1683461
Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7234 (4616)Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7234 (4616)
Mark Nottingham
2017-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/Ei8SNnHcESGEtmElqNhZ1EJwEjI/
2318950
1162917
Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4663)Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4663)
Mark Nottingham
2017-01-20
httpbisa
/arch/msg/httpbisa/18eufxNdX4w8NQe0_d8FYneeoNQ/
2318949
1162843