Subject
From
Date
List
Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Christer's input on the rest of Peter's commentsRe: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Christer's input on the rest of Peter's comments
Christer Holmberg
2017-05-29
ice
/arch/msg/ice/aqhf10sbQiLBRk6Bifkk0xQZdfE/
2397734
1706515
Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Christer's input on the rest of Peter's commentsRe: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Christer's input on the rest of Peter's comments
Peter Thatcher
2017-06-01
ice
/arch/msg/ice/D-xVJmUIGRfQvngQJAtHesDRsdM/
2398869
1706515
Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Why can't a lite agent start an ICE restart or remove a media stream?Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Why can't a lite agent start an ICE restart or remove a media stream?
Christer Holmberg
2017-05-29
ice
/arch/msg/ice/lsElgfkyJWqR1KYXiTigIbnZlOw/
2397733
1706514
Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Why can't a lite agent start an ICE restart or remove a media stream?Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Why can't a lite agent start an ICE restart or remove a media stream?
Roman Shpount
2017-05-30
ice
/arch/msg/ice/5RRMEyXksoomcHkxnztKoHEmaX8/
2398001
1706514
Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Why can't a lite agent start an ICE restart or remove a media stream?Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Why can't a lite agent start an ICE restart or remove a media stream?
Christer Holmberg
2017-05-30
ice
/arch/msg/ice/FxjW3Y9E21Pr_Q0RuF1MnJOPAe0/
2398163
1706514
Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Why can't a lite agent start an ICE restart or remove a media stream?Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Why can't a lite agent start an ICE restart or remove a media stream?
Peter Thatcher
2017-06-01
ice
/arch/msg/ice/tlFK2NYn08xBr-rI1w2dvsqa5sg/
2398853
1706514
Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Why can't a lite agent start an ICE restart or remove a media stream?Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Why can't a lite agent start an ICE restart or remove a media stream?
Christer Holmberg
2017-06-01
ice
/arch/msg/ice/Ui-lSuYtQVZnwJJaxsqmBm_nBzM/
2398937
1706514
Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Why do we model valid candidate pairs as a separate list of separate candidates from the normal check list?Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Why do we model valid candidate pairs as a separate list of separate candidates from the normal check list?
Christer Holmberg
2017-05-29
ice
/arch/msg/ice/eNO-bHErW4CCr-SmY2nGP4cYHzs/
2397731
1706512
Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Why do we model valid candidate pairs as a separate list of separate candidates from the normal check list?Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Why do we model valid candidate pairs as a separate list of separate candidates from the normal check list?
Peter Thatcher
2017-06-01
ice
/arch/msg/ice/EFEm3jicHc5I0yoWsPUaOf9dmNI/
2398864
1706512
Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Why do we model valid candidate pairs as a separate list of separate candidates from the normal check list?Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Why do we model valid candidate pairs as a separate list of separate candidates from the normal check list?
Christer Holmberg
2017-06-01
ice
/arch/msg/ice/al8rbl64uOarULRjPN9rkFBikes/
2398927
1706512
Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Why do we model valid candidate pairs as a separate list of separate candidates from the normal check list?Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Why do we model valid candidate pairs as a separate list of separate candidates from the normal check list?
Peter Thatcher
2017-06-02
ice
/arch/msg/ice/jF79LOwWtl6ybaruGHK7Ba3MXRM/
2399252
1706512
Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Why do we model valid candidate pairs as a separate list of separate candidates from the normal check list?Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Why do we model valid candidate pairs as a separate list of separate candidates from the normal check list?
Christer Holmberg
2017-06-02
ice
/arch/msg/ice/BESgLVHxw46dxMVZHLmueVQtBfQ/
2399365
1706512
Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Why do we model valid candidate pairs as a separate list of separate candidates from the normal check list?Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Why do we model valid candidate pairs as a separate list of separate candidates from the normal check list?
Peter Thatcher
2017-06-02
ice
/arch/msg/ice/nY0c1nvaFvn3jhmfAu-L7xa2kuQ/
2399708
1706512
Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Why do we model valid candidate pairs as a separate list of separate candidates from the normal check list?Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Why do we model valid candidate pairs as a separate list of separate candidates from the normal check list?
Christer Holmberg
2017-06-05
ice
/arch/msg/ice/RwyfXEDh1IveThg7sEWdyXn0dP8/
2400189
1706512
Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Why do we model valid candidate pairs as a separate list of separate candidates from the normal check list?Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Why do we model valid candidate pairs as a separate list of separate candidates from the normal check list?
Peter Thatcher
2017-06-05
ice
/arch/msg/ice/HkOCXSCSLKFLcizVzB3rSFHPHxw/
2400404
1706512
Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Why do we model valid candidate pairs as a separate list of separate candidates from the normal check list?Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Why do we model valid candidate pairs as a separate list of separate candidates from the normal check list?
Christer Holmberg
2017-06-08
ice
/arch/msg/ice/g71anYhMSpPXbyAtJxDPT5x8ifc/
2401911
1706512
Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Why do we model valid candidate pairs as a separate list of separate candidates from the normal check list?Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Why do we model valid candidate pairs as a separate list of separate candidates from the normal check list?
Peter Thatcher
2017-06-08
ice
/arch/msg/ice/6E9lrc5IXYpY6YOvQTfX3GrsgAw/
2402115
1706512
Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Much of the spec is much more complicated than it otherwise would be because a media stream has more than one component.Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Much of the spec is much more complicated than it otherwise would be because a media stream has more than one component.
Christer Holmberg
2017-05-29
ice
/arch/msg/ice/X6Pq7fIVCjxi-BWbu3SxEoi-3lQ/
2397729
1706511
Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Much of the spec is much more complicated than it otherwise would be because a media stream has more than one component.Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Much of the spec is much more complicated than it otherwise would be because a media stream has more than one component.
Peter Thatcher
2017-06-01
ice
/arch/msg/ice/RpmcG2p3DETr2cWeXEjHHR7uGNU/
2398862
1706511
Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Much of the spec is much more complicated than it otherwise would be because a media stream has more than one component.Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Much of the spec is much more complicated than it otherwise would be because a media stream has more than one component.
Christer Holmberg
2017-06-01
ice
/arch/msg/ice/zqXb4Xg4IP6NXxOWImUiOV6TLto/
2398928
1706511
Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Much of the spec is much more complicated than it otherwise would be because a media stream has more than one component.Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - Much of the spec is much more complicated than it otherwise would be because a media stream has more than one component.
Christer Holmberg
2017-06-01
ice
/arch/msg/ice/r_VuNIG1PdQpleUnrPWkcpVqlYU/
2399005
1706511
Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis- Why do we nominate by putting the valid pair in the triggered check queue? (7.1.1)Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis- Why do we nominate by putting the valid pair in the triggered check queue? (7.1.1)
Christer Holmberg
2017-05-29
ice
/arch/msg/ice/C3Aw75FxIfm3RkP2jRJYm9a517o/
2397728
1706510
Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis- Why do we nominate by putting the valid pair in the triggered check queue? (7.1.1)Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis- Why do we nominate by putting the valid pair in the triggered check queue? (7.1.1)
Peter Thatcher
2017-06-01
ice
/arch/msg/ice/I_5ZIBmJXz4xciZn90RyzNuHooM/
2398861
1706510
Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis- Why do we nominate by putting the valid pair in the triggered check queue? (7.1.1)Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis- Why do we nominate by putting the valid pair in the triggered check queue? (7.1.1)
Christer Holmberg
2017-06-01
ice
/arch/msg/ice/lCkVmPCQOf515ndABRo-CypiJXU/
2398929
1706510
Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - removal of lower-priority candidate pairs (5.1.2.5)Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - removal of lower-priority candidate pairs (5.1.2.5)
Christer Holmberg
2017-05-29
ice
/arch/msg/ice/IQSwaxumnAt5ipTlN1zinfbVmrs/
2397727
1706509
Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - removal of lower-priority candidate pairs (5.1.2.5)Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - removal of lower-priority candidate pairs (5.1.2.5)
Peter Thatcher
2017-06-01
ice
/arch/msg/ice/C3N1-_PH-LOD7VRO1E3JGdnnOIs/
2398860
1706509
Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - removal of lower-priority candidate pairs (5.1.2.5)Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis - removal of lower-priority candidate pairs (5.1.2.5)
Christer Holmberg
2017-06-01
ice
/arch/msg/ice/9Y6pc2C__eaE95tJc8ywMujcTCc/
2398931
1706509
[Ice] Draft new version: draft-ietf-ice-rfc5245bis-10[Ice] Draft new version: draft-ietf-ice-rfc5245bis-10
Christer Holmberg
2017-05-26
ice
/arch/msg/ice/1gJ2oo27BEwz5eNCyuILwYE8MRk/
2397027
1706073
[Ice] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ice-rfc5245bis-10.txt[Ice] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ice-rfc5245bis-10.txt
internet-drafts
2017-05-26
ice
/arch/msg/ice/pxeZpfS6DARhGQ58Pfzg7LQc2A0/
2397026
1706072
[Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis[Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis
Peter Thatcher
2017-05-26
ice
/arch/msg/ice/jKZH6ObLWJoQO6pYiuvj56rVRtI/
2397023
1706070
Re: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbisRe: [Ice] Peter's review of ICEbis
Christer Holmberg
2017-05-26
ice
/arch/msg/ice/b02lxRIhOl-Y0zlxblYlNh840LA/
2397033
1706070
[Ice] WGLC for draft-ietf-ice-trickle-11[Ice] WGLC for draft-ietf-ice-trickle-11
Peter Thatcher
2017-05-25
ice
/arch/msg/ice/Y-3tuwpmiZo7xa7LQC4FQrXTEO4/
2396885
1705999
Re: [Ice] WGLC for draft-ietf-ice-trickle-11Re: [Ice] WGLC for draft-ietf-ice-trickle-11
Christer Holmberg
2017-05-26
ice
/arch/msg/ice/OULJYx9AJxhLxlDCcmLs4j6jxn4/
2397030
1705999
Re: [Ice] WGLC for draft-ietf-ice-trickle-11Re: [Ice] WGLC for draft-ietf-ice-trickle-11
Ari Keränen
2017-05-26
ice
/arch/msg/ice/AOeLRCQe6-QwZLE72qOhP15TDi4/
2397300
1705999
Re: [Ice] WGLC for draft-ietf-ice-trickle-11Re: [Ice] WGLC for draft-ietf-ice-trickle-11
Peter Saint-Andre
2017-05-26
ice
/arch/msg/ice/i2MZAa3_ehWPy4hmdql1vuX-4d0/
2397328
1705999
Re: [Ice] WGLC for draft-ietf-ice-trickle-11Re: [Ice] WGLC for draft-ietf-ice-trickle-11
Ari Keränen
2017-05-27
ice
/arch/msg/ice/KX_cTVGHnK8iPssg_GrKcfrCTfg/
2397452
1705999
Re: [Ice] WGLC for draft-ietf-ice-trickle-11Re: [Ice] WGLC for draft-ietf-ice-trickle-11
Christer Holmberg
2017-05-27
ice
/arch/msg/ice/zxqIZ7f5w55xwFPAdI9a_wU1Xvs/
2397454
1705999
[Ice] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ice-trickle-11.txt[Ice] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ice-trickle-11.txt
internet-drafts
2017-05-25
ice
/arch/msg/ice/dj0l97NY7B1_LpMKNiDq2DIniZQ/
2396605
1705888
[Ice] ice - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 99[Ice] ice - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 99
IETF Meeting Session Request Tool
2017-05-24
ice
/arch/msg/ice/L7xYyho2eKs916HaO0huVXSefsg/
2396208
1705706
[Ice] ICE at IETF 99[Ice] ICE at IETF 99
Ari Keränen
2017-05-18
ice
/arch/msg/ice/5H7biCQl6bPBeYmdpKIyoe2U6iw/
2393884
1704628