Subject
From
Date
List
[Jmap] Hacker News Discussion - getMailboxes single data set vs tree primitives or paging[Jmap] Hacker News Discussion - getMailboxes single data set vs tree primitives or paging
Bron Gondwana
2017-05-07
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/7dSQsqRBJ_YlZ7wF83i2ihi14XI/
2388946
1702467
Re: [Jmap] Hacker News Discussion - getMailboxes single data set vs tree primitives or pagingRe: [Jmap] Hacker News Discussion - getMailboxes single data set vs tree primitives or paging
Mike Cardwell
2017-05-07
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/0vRDv5XSRwpU6isqkCo079eCHMI/
2388949
1702467
Re: [Jmap] Hacker News Discussion - getMailboxes single data set vs tree primitives or pagingRe: [Jmap] Hacker News Discussion - getMailboxes single data set vs tree primitives or paging
Ted Lemon
2017-05-07
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/kyDs4ZnJAmCSFoLQomuJNsBZNS8/
2388955
1702467
Re: [Jmap] Hacker News Discussion - getMailboxes single data set vs tree primitives or pagingRe: [Jmap] Hacker News Discussion - getMailboxes single data set vs tree primitives or paging
Neil Jenkins
2017-05-08
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/7deaFoQgAS1w69YiAJCjn8UiYRk/
2389070
1702467
Re: [Jmap] Hacker News Discussion - getMailboxes single data set vs tree primitives or pagingRe: [Jmap] Hacker News Discussion - getMailboxes single data set vs tree primitives or paging
Bron Gondwana
2017-05-08
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/MPlL8uuZbu8Mnx-1kFAFU3xM-AY/
2389155
1702467
Re: [Jmap] Hacker News Discussion - getMailboxes single data set vs tree primitives or pagingRe: [Jmap] Hacker News Discussion - getMailboxes single data set vs tree primitives or paging
Arnt Gulbrandsen
2017-05-08
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/PuSEYcpxWD7wNj_Ahuml0MbRSoc/
2389175
1702467
Re: [Jmap] Hacker News Discussion - getMailboxes single data set vs tree primitives or pagingRe: [Jmap] Hacker News Discussion - getMailboxes single data set vs tree primitives or paging
Bron Gondwana
2017-05-09
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/gaEhQ50pmqzR68agrhOJIKo72ZE/
2389409
1702467
Re: [Jmap] Hacker News Discussion - getMailboxes single data set vs tree primitives or pagingRe: [Jmap] Hacker News Discussion - getMailboxes single data set vs tree primitives or paging
Neil Jenkins
2017-05-09
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/Ogs1Nz2HtopbvulhS3nKfNp6Pw0/
2389497
1702467
Re: [Jmap] Hacker News Discussion - getMailboxes single data set vs tree primitives or pagingRe: [Jmap] Hacker News Discussion - getMailboxes single data set vs tree primitives or paging
Alexey Melnikov
2017-05-08
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/GZrFQ-jmyhruq-cF6biGtZ_uFcI/
2389162
1702467
Re: [Jmap] Hacker News Discussion - getMailboxes single data set vs tree primitives or pagingRe: [Jmap] Hacker News Discussion - getMailboxes single data set vs tree primitives or paging
Bron Gondwana
2017-05-08
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/P9WIAmrryS6tFNNG5KxWBJ3HOpA/
2389156
1702467
[Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP[Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP
Adrien de Croy
2017-04-24
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/LPEKhVA6kcGR0C0cHrG5BBERNPA/
2383450
1700374
Re: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAPRe: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP
Chris Newman
2017-04-25
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/0IDAoYkJ-MQRlseZh52KHrtpuYQ/
2383480
1700374
Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)
xn--l1b0cxc
2017-05-04
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/1UFkELZFXlDXV3GosK9GTPJXAfk/
2388544
1700374
Re: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAPRe: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP
Ted Lemon
2017-04-25
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/3sm2HrleOgzYxfe_YhuNhL_6qYs/
2383486
1700374
Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)
xn--l1b0cxc
2017-05-05
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/hgI1EgqWYbDSjpqjllwjIte9ioc/
2388545
1700374
Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)
ajay
2017-05-05
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/X4GRm7ywJyZhI1oia5Tl5UP1KvU/
2388515
1700374
Re: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAPRe: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP
Chris Newman
2017-04-25
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/EvN1oiRjOVrxYLqvC9fXUL07_Sk/
2383503
1700374
Re: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAPRe: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP
Neil Jenkins
2017-04-25
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/blUSWWicHBibApnL0vQcwBtaRgI/
2383506
1700374
Re: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAPRe: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP
Bron Gondwana
2017-04-25
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/ZZeUueN0wboIeLhXq8yP4mR58fc/
2383567
1700374
Re: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAPRe: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP
Chris Newman
2017-04-25
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/zFiVNYZL5XXOZfMksG7HxmTwnd8/
2384082
1700374
Re: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAPRe: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP
Ted Lemon
2017-04-25
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/FbwFisfbjLgvq9JD2joiMpgggd4/
2384085
1700374
Re: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAPRe: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP
Neil Jenkins
2017-04-25
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/oGu4vdBLsv5tenkFM6OgarrXs1k/
2384102
1700374
Re: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAPRe: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP
Chris Newman
2017-04-26
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/gTAAf8HTLMfkatwZocqlTJKImBA/
2384186
1700374
Re: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAPRe: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP
Bron Gondwana
2017-04-26
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/CD_Vy39_aSi4Gk_IR4uBxkj8VKs/
2384194
1700374
[Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)[Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)
Chris Newman
2017-04-26
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/ZiXC-x-lAchRc2tc8SfOK2L_QJg/
2384535
1700374
Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)
Ted Lemon
2017-04-26
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/mUnOKXwKKvws2RyTVJpIn224Az4/
2384591
1700374
Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)
Adrien de Croy
2017-04-26
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/lKe2tUME64PqHxMBBrkqCZz6_uM/
2384742
1700374
Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)
Neil Jenkins
2017-04-26
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/oDLa-VeMUtHN9xKaaACPGFTAJJo/
2384736
1700374
Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)
Neil Jenkins
2017-04-26
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/ZhuEaZPZ-yUpg9K_Gp-W74lBvIA/
2384737
1700374
Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)
Adrien de Croy
2017-04-26
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/3G2EFv6jQYjpmgXfNe8GkQ5miX8/
2384739
1700374
Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)
Neil Jenkins
2017-04-26
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/_jcND0SQomY0G_Xg6z4Gll6yofY/
2384743
1700374
Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)
Chris Newman
2017-04-27
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/i6iYV0hM6KQyRZBmxu0Lwo5_lO8/
2384794
1700374
Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)
Neil Jenkins
2017-04-28
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/ZR_a76_GnydzAc5y68lNwE1-hWk/
2385490
1700374
Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)
Chris Newman
2017-05-01
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/fGvw7IndLPUu34lE4YlzCZULub0/
2386601
1700374
Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)
Neil Jenkins
2017-05-03
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/RDzFyVBoNQsLMpTuzeanzbfTkT8/
2387342
1700374
Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)
Ted Lemon
2017-05-03
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/3UWZ2G3LXMcnikqfBn2FhOtP8dE/
2387561
1700374
Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)
Chris Newman
2017-05-03
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/u_r88hwTHD1Wxd-cvYsD0M2_QBk/
2387694
1700374
Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)
Neil Jenkins
2017-05-08
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/_karvBGTBDaHx0m5gpOcOlVnYa4/
2389067
1700374
Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)
Ned Freed
2017-04-27
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/kWtnk249-FlmV4NO8hcofPjX03w/
2385180
1700374
Re: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAPRe: [Jmap] Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP
Ned Freed
2017-04-26
jmap
/arch/msg/jmap/JUHsVS9gLAmckMzZmGiIbyVe21w/
2384368
1700374