[Json] JSON Schema[Json] JSON Schema
Henry Andrews
2018-01-20
json
/arch/msg/json/w--4QtcF9remEI3FfGM6ghBFkEQ/
2531561
1765157
[Json] 1. Corrected Announcement: STD 90, RFC 8259 on The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format (rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org)[Json] 1. Corrected Announcement: STD 90, RFC 8259 on The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format (rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org)
Crandall Navy
2018-01-12
json
/arch/msg/json/PsznInB4c9WJb_m0C4SIMBGM3sw/
2529011
1764077
Re: [Json] JSON Concluded? Well, maybe notRe: [Json] JSON Concluded? Well, maybe not
Anders Rundgren
2018-01-04
json
/arch/msg/json/vzzNr1a0fWQFyA4Fti6T6fSfLGc/
2525710
1762404
Re: [Json] JSON Concluded? Well, maybe notRe: [Json] JSON Concluded? Well, maybe not
Richard Gibson
2018-01-03
json
/arch/msg/json/oP3Dny4TcfUXPa1hht7l59UKI10/
2525500
1762404
Re: [Json] JSON Concluded? Well, maybe notRe: [Json] JSON Concluded? Well, maybe not
Anders Rundgren
2018-01-03
json
/arch/msg/json/n4H9imgwffvqpZ5uWfucBzV7tD4/
2525375
1762404
Re: [Json] JSON Concluded? Well, maybe notRe: [Json] JSON Concluded? Well, maybe not
Richard Gibson
2018-01-02
json
/arch/msg/json/IP46xA_5jqcdvLnVTJjobrQqg3c/
2525104
1762404
Re: [Json] JSON Concluded? Well, maybe notRe: [Json] JSON Concluded? Well, maybe not
Anders Rundgren
2018-01-01
json
/arch/msg/json/-rq76BWiwG4KjXiTlmyECTi3Lrw/
2524887
1762404
Re: [Json] JSON Concluded? Well, maybe notRe: [Json] JSON Concluded? Well, maybe not
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2018-01-01
json
/arch/msg/json/yA-RbTjgIoP0jRO8J213utQvPek/
2524886
1762404
Re: [Json] JSON Schema (Was: JSON Concluded? Well, maybe not)Re: [Json] JSON Schema (Was: JSON Concluded? Well, maybe not)
Pete Cordell
2018-01-01
json
/arch/msg/json/DKoqXGkrprJaqmx7W3c4yuqee1E/
2524876
1762404
Re: [Json] JSON Concluded? Well, maybe notRe: [Json] JSON Concluded? Well, maybe not
Anders Rundgren
2018-01-01
json
/arch/msg/json/hgFm1xkdk2msliEhpLywbOVs5Co/
2524868
1762404
Re: [Json] JSON Concluded? Well, maybe notRe: [Json] JSON Concluded? Well, maybe not
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2018-01-01
json
/arch/msg/json/ehJ0CcZ4vRlJy9KX_GXNPuH2RRE/
2524867
1762404
Re: [Json] JSON Concluded? Well, maybe notRe: [Json] JSON Concluded? Well, maybe not
Anders Rundgren
2018-01-01
json
/arch/msg/json/8mEyvwfqgCwkpApUDiiUGGaP-RM/
2524866
1762404
Re: [Json] JSON Concluded? Well, maybe notRe: [Json] JSON Concluded? Well, maybe not
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2018-01-01
json
/arch/msg/json/sAjCrpTWyMoZinqWD6iOsy1BbgE/
2524860
1762404
Re: [Json] JSON Concluded? Well, maybe notRe: [Json] JSON Concluded? Well, maybe not
Richard Gibson
2017-12-31
json
/arch/msg/json/tUGe-m_81cvBC6d05Q5tMkh_Pjw/
2524855
1762404
Re: [Json] JSON Concluded? Well, maybe notRe: [Json] JSON Concluded? Well, maybe not
Anders Rundgren
2017-12-31
json
/arch/msg/json/GNACNSU5Q4rVNad3vavJaBBNri0/
2524852
1762404
Re: [Json] JSON Concluded? Well, maybe notRe: [Json] JSON Concluded? Well, maybe not
Erik Wilde
2017-12-31
json
/arch/msg/json/C7YvXkXOrW2r8WWK8pLo8edbodg/
2524850
1762404
Re: [Json] JSON Concluded? Well, maybe notRe: [Json] JSON Concluded? Well, maybe not
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2017-12-31
json
/arch/msg/json/3hxIdm-_TirpIkCGItaKZsxzOnM/
2524849
1762404
Re: [Json] JSON Concluded? Well, maybe notRe: [Json] JSON Concluded? Well, maybe not
Tim Bray
2017-12-31
json
/arch/msg/json/Ec78QgZqpvcqPd97fvGV3Nt2tVA/
2524847
1762404
Re: [Json] JSON Concluded? Well, maybe notRe: [Json] JSON Concluded? Well, maybe not
Richard Gibson
2017-12-31
json
/arch/msg/json/SiFuSdiN7ikdjq0jHeYs2qVNy4k/
2524846
1762404
[Json] JSON Concluded? Well, maybe not[Json] JSON Concluded? Well, maybe not
Anders Rundgren
2017-12-31
json
/arch/msg/json/ry3X1fNW8iEE9TmVo7V6m3gwzRI/
2524817
1762404
[Json] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8259 (5218)[Json] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8259 (5218)
RFC Errata System
2017-12-28
json
/arch/msg/json/3VxyQUdT-H9fybJBJlSvdIWq5fQ/
2524598
1762271
[Json] WG Action: Conclusion of Javascript Object Notation Update (JSONBIS)[Json] WG Action: Conclusion of Javascript Object Notation Update (JSONBIS)
IESG Secretary
2017-12-18
json
/arch/msg/json/GzmYteHs19ruG9eQ_ouVEZHZ3DU/
2522370
1761242
[Json] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8259 (5210)[Json] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8259 (5210)
RFC Errata System
2017-12-16
json
/arch/msg/json/1IPqe_ML_DLd_2tAlV9Sx0Sm24I/
2521967
1761071
[Json] Fwd: Corrected Announcement: STD 90, RFC 8259 on The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format[Json] Fwd: Corrected Announcement: STD 90, RFC 8259 on The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format
Matthew A. Miller
2017-12-13
json
/arch/msg/json/rlSJCGhVfxxHV9y4-CKznTPzi8w/
2520654
1760512
[Json] Corrected Announcement: STD 90, RFC 8259 on The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format[Json] Corrected Announcement: STD 90, RFC 8259 on The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format
rfc-editor
2017-12-13
json
/arch/msg/json/gjHLncS7zzop6pHlgeG-9VPVWvI/
2520529
1760512
[Json] RFC 8259 on The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format[Json] RFC 8259 on The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format
rfc-editor
2017-12-13
json
/arch/msg/json/viZkqDPWV6p-mycPaNEoilqUmRk/
2520513
1760508
Re: [Json] Inconsistency between RFC 8259 and RFC 5234Re: [Json] Inconsistency between RFC 8259 and RFC 5234
Tim Bray
2017-12-13
json
/arch/msg/json/POr1oYhL5NjzIyvGFLvv9kfzyGo/
2520107
1760341
Re: [Json] Inconsistency between RFC 8259 and RFC 5234Re: [Json] Inconsistency between RFC 8259 and RFC 5234
Mark Nottingham
2017-12-13
json
/arch/msg/json/fuhJf0xS_5nH1x7pvE2uYVDgB90/
2520097
1760341
[Json] Fwd: Inconsistency between RFC 8259 and RFC 5234[Json] Fwd: Inconsistency between RFC 8259 and RFC 5234
Tim Bray
2017-12-12
json
/arch/msg/json/YBHyyHQxtVwpCVyx6jHZTL6gvTU/
2520077
1760341
Re: [Json] jsonbis - Not having a session at IETF 100Re: [Json] jsonbis - Not having a session at IETF 100
Martin J. Dürst
2017-12-11
json
/arch/msg/json/iSLM2T6IOkEq4wq5wJOq3-ucXGs/
2519316
1740155
Re: [Json] jsonbis - Not having a session at IETF 100Re: [Json] jsonbis - Not having a session at IETF 100
Carsten Bormann
2017-12-09
json
/arch/msg/json/GpxxG74uKK4isomq7EdMPIl-rsg/
2519099
1740155
Re: [Json] jsonbis - Not having a session at IETF 100Re: [Json] jsonbis - Not having a session at IETF 100
Peter F. Patel-Schneider
2017-12-09
json
/arch/msg/json/8xoBmJVwJZcP_Ie2nhaFduUJiCc/
2519083
1740155
Re: [Json] jsonbis - Not having a session at IETF 100Re: [Json] jsonbis - Not having a session at IETF 100
Julian Reschke
2017-12-09
json
/arch/msg/json/14TWVA3jxTj9yO1HH1UIVUIog2E/
2518993
1740155
Re: [Json] Support for "\/" in ECMA versus I-JSON?Re: [Json] Support for "\/" in ECMA versus I-JSON?
Anders Rundgren
2017-11-19
json
/arch/msg/json/RFPClnHz-ALz7sxehvTWhdlWg_E/
2511752
1717506
Re: [Json] Support for "\/" in ECMA versus I-JSON?Re: [Json] Support for "\/" in ECMA versus I-JSON?
Paul Hoffman
2017-11-18
json
/arch/msg/json/wFVJFoqHD2YhhuseaKak5uuxBxc/
2511713
1717506
Re: [Json] Support for "\/" in ECMA versus I-JSON?Re: [Json] Support for "\/" in ECMA versus I-JSON?
Tim Bray
2017-11-18
json
/arch/msg/json/r4qjRprJEvoCgnvfdqsq9WpT8J0/
2511710
1717506
[Json] Support for "\/" in ECMA versus I-JSON?[Json] Support for "\/" in ECMA versus I-JSON?
Anders Rundgren
2017-11-18
json
/arch/msg/json/QxyWdjX1LAqPatZd-4F7nhipxv8/
2511659
1717506
Re: [Json] jsonbis - Not having a session at IETF 100Re: [Json] jsonbis - Not having a session at IETF 100
Peter F. Patel-Schneider
2017-11-12
json
/arch/msg/json/y42H9HTcAApHv5S6GBbBz0S9Xbc/
2507200
1740155
Re: [Json] jsonbis - Not having a session at IETF 100Re: [Json] jsonbis - Not having a session at IETF 100
Matthew A. Miller
2017-11-12
json
/arch/msg/json/1xTY7lKwIpGL6MKKqVQ8TWq-ugI/
2507040
1740155
Re: [Json] jsonbis - Not having a session at IETF 100Re: [Json] jsonbis - Not having a session at IETF 100
Peter F. Patel-Schneider
2017-11-09
json
/arch/msg/json/0NDTtzkERRTkJgON3a3hliZQZ2Q/
2506074
1740155