Subject
From
Date
List
[quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify labels example in -tls Appendix A.1. (#4403)[quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify labels example in -tls Appendix A.1. (#4403)
Paul Mabileau
2020-11-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/iQb8wPWKbC5EpAbCWYtuHvOUcdc/
2966841
1926864
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify labels example in -tls Appendix A.1. (#4403)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify labels example in -tls Appendix A.1. (#4403)
Martin Thomson
2020-11-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/CCPlOQQJmBK7b3v9DTb01rbnngQ/
2966945
1926864
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify labels example in -tls Appendix A.1. (#4403)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify labels example in -tls Appendix A.1. (#4403)
Martin Thomson
2020-11-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/QVcYwgfSmYeAKLz8huJC8Y3-TRs/
2966948
1926864
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify labels example in -tls Appendix A.1. (#4403)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify labels example in -tls Appendix A.1. (#4403)
Martin Thomson
2020-11-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/oj8hry3NUwdCeLfx3j23ao-4l3s/
2966950
1926864
[quicwg/base-drafts] Fix readme link to contributing guidelines (#4402)[quicwg/base-drafts] Fix readme link to contributing guidelines (#4402)
Paul Mabileau
2020-11-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/i7JuQcpsgiBJnCZsxXLC_RHE4z0/
2966816
1926855
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Fix readme link to contributing guidelines (#4402)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Fix readme link to contributing guidelines (#4402)
Mike Bishop
2020-11-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/OqwRNWuWcRkMmH_lUuvveOScSgc/
2966887
1926855
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Fix readme link to contributing guidelines (#4402)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Fix readme link to contributing guidelines (#4402)
Mike Bishop
2020-11-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/sJNMcA1hK7_cgS8pbtILfDPv_Lc/
2966889
1926855
[quicwg/base-drafts] secdir review of -qpack; issue 3 (#4401)[quicwg/base-drafts] secdir review of -qpack; issue 3 (#4401)
Lars Eggert
2020-11-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ozPNlIxiylm_1qwoH9M0i-U7XPs/
2966699
1926806
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] secdir review of -qpack; issue 3 (#4401)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] secdir review of -qpack; issue 3 (#4401)
afrind
2020-11-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/-_OOezBi-IFBG2S6lApYPutvZJo/
2969747
1926806
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] secdir review of -qpack; issue 3 (#4401)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] secdir review of -qpack; issue 3 (#4401)
afrind
2020-12-02
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/SAYWMC48TGL6Jvj7atfSpCVFdxI/
2970250
1926806
[quicwg/base-drafts] secdir review of -qpack; issue 2 (#4400)[quicwg/base-drafts] secdir review of -qpack; issue 2 (#4400)
Lars Eggert
2020-11-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/kRP5_uzGF05XjSKQdJ6rTjJeiZc/
2966698
1926805
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] secdir review of -qpack; issue 2 (#4400)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] secdir review of -qpack; issue 2 (#4400)
Martin Thomson
2020-11-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/bodDKxkiVhiiUh5yuw0hJzaJfn4/
2966741
1926805
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] secdir review of -qpack; issue 2 (#4400)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] secdir review of -qpack; issue 2 (#4400)
Mike Bishop
2020-11-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/J4VvAuh50jeRIU_wr4HYOmu8fW4/
2966752
1926805
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] secdir review of -qpack; issue 2 (#4400)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] secdir review of -qpack; issue 2 (#4400)
Mike Bishop
2020-11-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/3W5_okJySREeFA3YS60IXXbK9Gw/
2966753
1926805
[quicwg/base-drafts] secdir review of -qpack; issue 11 (#4399)[quicwg/base-drafts] secdir review of -qpack; issue 11 (#4399)
Lars Eggert
2020-11-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/eXat0Ek7pRoJR5f45LsHBrXBYcE/
2966697
1926804
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] secdir review of -qpack; issue 1 (#4399)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] secdir review of -qpack; issue 1 (#4399)
afrind
2020-11-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ot776dlSsrVP3cmrtW4JmfBYtzE/
2969741
1926804
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] secdir review of -qpack; issue 1 (#4399)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] secdir review of -qpack; issue 1 (#4399)
Lars Eggert
2020-12-04
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/eJ-yrIkpTrT_l7oqp_JLAKAflXc/
2971693
1926804
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] secdir review of -qpack; issue 1 (#4399)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] secdir review of -qpack; issue 1 (#4399)
afrind
2020-12-08
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/czQeDAMXS8J4idBUQRMyA1tlzjA/
2973437
1926804
[quicwg/wg-materials] 34fc26: Rewrap and very minor tweaks (hence no PR)[quicwg/wg-materials] 34fc26: Rewrap and very minor tweaks (hence no PR)
Lars Eggert
2020-11-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/hxYth2L40JXROqgBE3NWeHdliTw/
2966575
1926768
[quicwg/wg-materials] a04b25: The name of the WG is "HTTP" (#183)[quicwg/wg-materials] a04b25: The name of the WG is "HTTP" (#183)
Mark Nottingham
2020-11-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/OEch6wyQ38rRYqBRPUEVPf0aGYE/
2966562
1926764
[quicwg/base-drafts] 5880b8: Script updating gh-pages from 98239d66. [ci skip][quicwg/base-drafts] 5880b8: Script updating gh-pages from 98239d66. [ci skip]
Martin Thomson
2020-11-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ypVtyTSjk2xdTaZI_Kj-su5aOI8/
2966428
1926671
[quicwg/base-drafts] ee55b3: Remove one errant use of idempotent[quicwg/base-drafts] ee55b3: Remove one errant use of idempotent
Martin Thomson
2020-11-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/wkwVn8K8tkjLhq3jQXAQjYC95r8/
2966426
1926670
[quicwg/base-drafts] 6c5edd: Script updating archive at 2020-11-20T00:20:58Z. [...[quicwg/base-drafts] 6c5edd: Script updating archive at 2020-11-20T00:20:58Z. [...
Martin Thomson
2020-11-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/iHsPf482W-gShVMXPZf9_9NvSa8/
2966421
1926668
[quicwg/base-drafts] b116ba: Script updating gh-pages from 7123002c. [ci skip][quicwg/base-drafts] b116ba: Script updating gh-pages from 7123002c. [ci skip]
Martin Thomson
2020-11-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/enFW0McjD-FYbkX3Px5i76Fm6wc/
2966420
1926667
[quicwg/base-drafts] cf2b89: packets aren't number space[quicwg/base-drafts] cf2b89: packets aren't number space
Martin Thomson
2020-11-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/SsyXM-uwsqgWTW583WIVcmcRgYU/
2966418
1926666
[quicwg/base-drafts] [editorial] packets aren't number space (#4398)[quicwg/base-drafts] [editorial] packets aren't number space (#4398)
Kazuho Oku
2020-11-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/LdHAR_4QuGtzxyUSZ1uoO9vQNuk/
2966403
1926657
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] [editorial] packets aren't number space (#4398)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] [editorial] packets aren't number space (#4398)
Martin Thomson
2020-11-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/1UIQPO_0UsWPLurvSWMC9TIkZts/
2966419
1926657
[quicwg/base-drafts] "1-RTT packet" is defined nowhere (#4397)[quicwg/base-drafts] "1-RTT packet" is defined nowhere (#4397)
Kazuho Oku
2020-11-19
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Kg86TFDg7SdfrMNdh6eeln1VQSg/
2966400
1926654
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] "1-RTT packet" is defined nowhere (#4397)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] "1-RTT packet" is defined nowhere (#4397)
Jana Iyengar
2020-12-07
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/CFlhwfgIMecv9rbXsWvvTwCao9M/
2972629
1926654
[quicwg/base-drafts] minimum valid packet size is an example (#4396)[quicwg/base-drafts] minimum valid packet size is an example (#4396)
Kazuho Oku
2020-11-19
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/7CH6D-OfSOI5VRVkIAXE9AsWt4s/
2966386
1926646
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] minimum valid packet size is an example (#4396)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] minimum valid packet size is an example (#4396)
Nick Banks
2020-11-19
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ztNYikQedQcH_i-4yl6vj2B-XcU/
2966397
1926646
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] minimum valid packet size is an example (#4396)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] minimum valid packet size is an example (#4396)
David Schinazi
2020-11-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/21MWyVK-Innui6c3naiHpHz8nLA/
2966416
1926646
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] minimum valid packet size is an example (#4396)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] minimum valid packet size is an example (#4396)
Martin Thomson
2020-11-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ijbhXjvKChknib-RH8FWuelCSgA/
2966417
1926646
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] minimum valid packet size is an example (#4396)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] minimum valid packet size is an example (#4396)
Kazuho Oku
2020-11-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/JBaJBm5nB5rc7-tlY-pW3WhGuYM/
2966435
1926646
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] minimum valid packet size is an example (#4396)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] minimum valid packet size is an example (#4396)
Jana Iyengar
2020-11-21
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/pcmw_hq5KIg6KE-PCzApXMbzfz8/
2967003
1926646
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] minimum valid packet size is an example (#4396)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] minimum valid packet size is an example (#4396)
Jana Iyengar
2020-11-21
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/cEyVyxuNovbMgtZqf2WkijXlC7Q/
2967006
1926646
[quicwg/base-drafts] Must small VN packets be dropped? (#4395)[quicwg/base-drafts] Must small VN packets be dropped? (#4395)
Ryan Hamilton
2020-11-19
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/1IjENpJqPgTgescMgkqOoRN5YXE/
2966333
1926628
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Must small VN packets be dropped? (#4395)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Must small VN packets be dropped? (#4395)
Kazuho Oku
2020-11-19
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/rGlo_9HJ34ZkKfkkMn7RcNVTy_M/
2966377
1926628
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Must small VN packets be dropped? (#4395)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Must small VN packets be dropped? (#4395)
David Schinazi
2020-11-19
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/DHrdB-tlAOVe0kekKQu3ZQLKrWA/
2966380
1926628
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Must small VN packets be dropped? (#4395)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Must small VN packets be dropped? (#4395)
Kazuho Oku
2020-11-19
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/tYFpXjDY2dqQWiWuMUOz2TJvBLU/
2966385
1926628