[quicwg/load-balancers] 8a2944: Script updating gh-pages from 9f81662. [ci skip][quicwg/load-balancers] 8a2944: Script updating gh-pages from 9f81662. [ci skip]
quicwg-bot
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/DUNM-l-RTmFjuB05nVY8iIDuyz8/
2922092
1910140
[quicwg/load-balancers] 9f8166: New test vectors[quicwg/load-balancers] 9f8166: New test vectors
martinduke
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/hO-hPgZzbRRis0KxbBIb9BhtOjA/
2922091
1910139
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use of "in order" might be misunderstood as an ordering requirement (2) (#4039)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use of "in order" might be misunderstood as an ordering requirement (2) (#4039)
Gorry Fairhurst
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/GpFZgajsCjK2wyrH7k4SAu3CNZI/
2922050
1910061
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use of "in order" might be misunderstood as an ordering requirement (2) (#4039)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use of "in order" might be misunderstood as an ordering requirement (2) (#4039)
Gorry Fairhurst
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/0bL2NTHq8L1eqUj1z2L4RCEiCxs/
2922049
1910061
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Less confusing "in order to" (#4042)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Less confusing "in order to" (#4042)
Gorry Fairhurst
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/iD3pOrjsDjnM_QF30AuMMtdEicg/
2922048
1910127
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use of "in order" might be misunderstood as an ordering requirement (2) (#4039)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use of "in order" might be misunderstood as an ordering requirement (2) (#4039)
Gorry Fairhurst
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/JtzxK_EndqBl9J8nff3jXcyQpRI/
2922039
1910061
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Less confusing "in order to" (#4042)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Less confusing "in order to" (#4042)
ianswett
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/6AX2mQ_YiwtoKzPeFEbItH9pqIs/
2922027
1910127
[quicwg/base-drafts] Less confusing "in order to" (#4042)[quicwg/base-drafts] Less confusing "in order to" (#4042)
Mike Bishop
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/hwSmrBw9Jjm2aXUHoDtqa1Yg7VM/
2922020
1910127
[quicwg/base-drafts] 63239a: Script updating archive at 2020-08-20T18:27:08Z. [...[quicwg/base-drafts] 63239a: Script updating archive at 2020-08-20T18:27:08Z. [...
Martin Thomson
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/XgGmkvQbv6UJxqrc1PGbZb3gIXA/
2922013
1910125
[quicwg/base-drafts] 286026: Script updating gh-pages from 31ae6232. [ci skip][quicwg/base-drafts] 286026: Script updating gh-pages from 31ae6232. [ci skip]
Martin Thomson
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/vCboKcGJwf6s7dStG1z_4UVQ0mo/
2922012
1910124
[quicwg/base-drafts] 31ae62: Holy orders, Batman![quicwg/base-drafts] 31ae62: Holy orders, Batman!
Mike Bishop
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/GBLg006xzcFjXJdr1kJ5fIqtrOM/
2922011
1910123
[quicwg/base-drafts] 0f0370: Holy orders[quicwg/base-drafts] 0f0370: Holy orders
Mike Bishop
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/V7lpILQrn66wzryxTuVF4CZ1Gwg/
2922010
1910122
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use of "in order" might be misunderstood as an ordering requirement (2) (#4039)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use of "in order" might be misunderstood as an ordering requirement (2) (#4039)
Mike Bishop
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/NnNx1maQHcQ-SOAF882VTm2ToZg/
2922009
1910061
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use of "in order" might be misunderstood as an ordering requirement (2) (#4039)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use of "in order" might be misunderstood as an ordering requirement (2) (#4039)
Mike Bishop
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/zHCXpi7yd77kUiksnkXIlRIiEzk/
2922005
1910061
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Client that does not PAD does not negotiate? (#4021)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Client that does not PAD does not negotiate? (#4021)
Mike Bishop
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/GueXkQWpVZo4Op33RWBBLhjflh8/
2921997
1909930
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] "don't delay" for PATH_RESPONSE (#4036)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] "don't delay" for PATH_RESPONSE (#4036)
ianswett
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/IPs3kDlIShUqu1SWowiAASeLRBM/
2921942
1910008
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Behavior around key availability delays during handshake (#3874)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Behavior around key availability delays during handshake (#3874)
ianswett
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/MFPHTcdspFUzTCOqZqiUzt6ptG0/
2921854
1903020
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Uncapped ACK Delay and RTT estimates (#4035)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Uncapped ACK Delay and RTT estimates (#4035)
ianswett
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/CO8io3SAMzLY_ZrqGhFCTlDYpPc/
2921852
1910002
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Behavior around key availability delays during handshake (#3874)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Behavior around key availability delays during handshake (#3874)
ianswett
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/9rji0FL7sDGl2hAAxQ0MgnUFDno/
2921851
1903020
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN "not quite enough" (#4022)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN "not quite enough" (#4022)
Lars Eggert
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/m0bc3vqUHdIV5xDbnQSF7QYie7I/
2921850
1909931
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN "not quite enough" (#4022)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN "not quite enough" (#4022)
Lars Eggert
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ZR8IbKcrYifKZWLp4rzu55coo0w/
2921849
1909931
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Fix some of the nits in #3214 (#4016)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Fix some of the nits in #3214 (#4016)
Lars Eggert
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/f5KfoM6ZYOTnSQwbl2WLa2_zzWo/
2921848
1909925
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN "not quite enough" (#4022)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN "not quite enough" (#4022)
Gorry Fairhurst
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/mgq0xhGFLGq6kUTiQP2Uw-9aOP0/
2921826
1909931
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allowing QUIC to suspend ECN usage (#4028)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allowing QUIC to suspend ECN usage (#4028)
Lars Eggert
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/bd-Wa4bP9RpBp2nEmdHr4k-jgxo/
2921824
1909937
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Does that include retransmissions? (#4030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Does that include retransmissions? (#4030)
Lars Eggert
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/BxsuB3z2I_iCaLsVJXb87V0NAzM/
2921822
1909939
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allowing QUIC to suspend ECN usage (#4028)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allowing QUIC to suspend ECN usage (#4028)
Gorry Fairhurst
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Fsc-5nmLHWcE3jo53B-X_l1ZsAs/
2921821
1909937
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Doesn’t say the default is in-order delivery (#4017)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Doesn’t say the default is in-order delivery (#4017)
Lars Eggert
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/w3FtEDJ8I86rI2ZpUgDP-dVYSr4/
2921820
1909926
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allowing QUIC to suspend ECN usage (#4028)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allowing QUIC to suspend ECN usage (#4028)
Lars Eggert
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/e_Ae9Da-Fz50bRbIwJq93dw2hMA/
2921810
1909937
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allowing QUIC to suspend ECN usage (#4028)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allowing QUIC to suspend ECN usage (#4028)
Gorry Fairhurst
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/MMA8eVkOUm3Ng1k148eemVaffdU/
2921808
1909937
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allowing QUIC to suspend ECN usage (#4028)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allowing QUIC to suspend ECN usage (#4028)
Lars Eggert
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/BHiBXWGDZJteE7rqCU8Urwnq-PI/
2921806
1909937
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allowing QUIC to suspend ECN usage (#4028)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allowing QUIC to suspend ECN usage (#4028)
Lars Eggert
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/DlGQvf9XqEkAfsXZPDyV9vN3WAo/
2921805
1909937
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allowing QUIC to suspend ECN usage (#4028)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allowing QUIC to suspend ECN usage (#4028)
mirjak
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/MorRP8Lz5I6UHX33ZIdbMIorASo/
2921804
1909937
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allowing QUIC to suspend ECN usage (#4028)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allowing QUIC to suspend ECN usage (#4028)
mirjak
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/usJJKucTp1BKqT3d3ZilGPOrRZk/
2921803
1909937
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add some MUSTs to congestion control (#3978)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add some MUSTs to congestion control (#3978)
mirjak
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/T0puIjtmjwDIPyFPkefjrweP5vw/
2921802
1907660
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add some MUSTs to congestion control (#3978)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add some MUSTs to congestion control (#3978)
mirjak
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/FO8OhEjoNktQBcjMwQ7zLXHpZlQ/
2921800
1907660
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Revalidation for ECN (#4037)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Revalidation for ECN (#4037)
mirjak
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/kxwz5JSOFJvySb51CjkO4dK_eKk/
2921799
1910024
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN "not quite enough" (#4022)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN "not quite enough" (#4022)
Lars Eggert
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/bXmzeBGWJ08sjzCeDbBx-8BkhtE/
2921784
1909931
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN "not quite enough" (#4022)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ECN "not quite enough" (#4022)
Gorry Fairhurst
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/quilRCzX5cv2Gml0qPpfKZkup68/
2921770
1909931
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use of "in order" might be misunderstood as an ordering requirement (1) (#4038)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use of "in order" might be misunderstood as an ordering requirement (1) (#4038)
Lars Eggert
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/IssB0P8m6l5AIibqFjt1FgXwFzI/
2921769
1910060
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Implying sequencing (#4018)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Implying sequencing (#4018)
Lars Eggert
2020-08-20
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/-txZga-1W0XywrMDwv6Fr-ua7bA/
2921765
1909927