[quicwg/wg-materials] Add invariants presentation (#18)[quicwg/wg-materials] Add invariants presentation (#18)
Martin Thomson
2018-01-15
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/O09cuo6XfoOF43MaVnbqBf9OVTY/
2529348
1764261
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Handling of Frames Inappropriate for Unidirectional Streams (#1047)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Handling of Frames Inappropriate for Unidirectional Streams (#1047)
Martin Thomson
2018-01-15
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/33LIpFslJHuIO-qwcVuR5BKjCJM/
2529339
1763528
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PING/PONG ambiguity (#1051)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PING/PONG ambiguity (#1051)
Martin Thomson
2018-01-15
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/XaRwVY4xQgQ4yXAb9HGjzXY89nw/
2529338
1764230
[quicwg/base-drafts] Increase the size of connection ID (#1052)[quicwg/base-drafts] Increase the size of connection ID (#1052)
Martin Thomson
2018-01-15
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/RgvqFkxTWrw1pjrzCixIJGijbos/
2529337
1764254
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] STOP_SENDING before stream open (#1050)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] STOP_SENDING before stream open (#1050)
Martin Thomson
2018-01-14
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/iW6w6INyjFnzaEugEjUrzHn11XY/
2529304
1764114
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PING/PONG ambiguity (#1051)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PING/PONG ambiguity (#1051)
MikkelFJ
2018-01-14
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/A1eoQ7V6PJfOtE2x_KoVqCcpBqI/
2529285
1764230
[quicwg/base-drafts] PING/PONG ambiguity (#1051)[quicwg/base-drafts] PING/PONG ambiguity (#1051)
Manuel Kieweg
2018-01-14
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/m9zm9yT0duMWRYAZ7ieMRnKDRyI/
2529274
1764230
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
MikkelFJ
2018-01-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/s1_sJ3mPecKLetipJDQhCgdru1k/
2529082
1761749
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
janaiyengar
2018-01-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/krsdVwhshA-T-D1QeuYOugpSMLU/
2529078
1761749
[quicwg/base-drafts] STOP_SENDING before stream open (#1050)[quicwg/base-drafts] STOP_SENDING before stream open (#1050)
MikkelFJ
2018-01-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/FS1owcJELDvYCKDV1YzAxnskvWk/
2529077
1764114
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Handling of Frames Inappropriate for Unidirectional Streams (#1047)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Handling of Frames Inappropriate for Unidirectional Streams (#1047)
janaiyengar
2018-01-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/GcdK4LdnRH024rd7x2vk_PdN9Ag/
2529076
1763528
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] transport_parameters minimum size should be 22 (#1042)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] transport_parameters minimum size should be 22 (#1042)
janaiyengar
2018-01-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/lCL_D7ulicnxWsOes51EI_EoFiY/
2529073
1763387
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Closes #1042 (#1044)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Closes #1042 (#1044)
janaiyengar
2018-01-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/FRmvEa_OfXb5dUxvKHPG0I8vPx4/
2529072
1763404
[quicwg/base-drafts] f563c8: Closes #1042 (#1044)[quicwg/base-drafts] f563c8: Closes #1042 (#1044)
Martin Thomson
2018-01-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/OgIyLlbw34Ybw6vu-jyhwiHjNTg/
2529071
1764112
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Closes #1042 (#1044)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Closes #1042 (#1044)
janaiyengar
2018-01-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/M03LtIu1clXWFEkSHisooJslekY/
2529070
1763404
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use address validation tokens, not STK (#1045)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use address validation tokens, not STK (#1045)
janaiyengar
2018-01-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/_3vCgXCGSOimFG3QcAaOnGVbG4o/
2529030
1763406
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove the STK in the Spoofed ACK Attack (#1035)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove the STK in the Spoofed ACK Attack (#1035)
janaiyengar
2018-01-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/vAeaFopbkBOibe-1fl1rYDAQP5w/
2529029
1762849
[quicwg/base-drafts] 058053: Use address validation tokens, not STK (#1045)[quicwg/base-drafts] 058053: Use address validation tokens, not STK (#1045)
Martin Thomson
2018-01-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ojE4NxzrRooYr2xQxMWt2HmCVP4/
2529028
1764080
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use address validation tokens, not STK (#1045)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use address validation tokens, not STK (#1045)
janaiyengar
2018-01-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/lakxfBSbm2vzJEUZC89PG-UpHnU/
2529027
1763406
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
ianswett
2018-01-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/4H0dA0Wnw1GpYojYHakt07jFgHk/
2529026
1761749
[quicwg/base-drafts] Specify start time for idle timeout (#1049)[quicwg/base-drafts] Specify start time for idle timeout (#1049)
janaiyengar
2018-01-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/dPloMbgFBfjwqo1p7DkwBxi3iKk/
2529025
1764079
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
MikkelFJ
2018-01-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/RtxmQiz-e2u-nGqnq6mjmCUy6fc/
2529023
1761749
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
Nick Banks
2018-01-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/YbC_yS9aySt4i4ev0va4I9B49kA/
2529020
1761749
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
MikkelFJ
2018-01-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/m27HLh06T07t4TrHsMgbKRHk9I4/
2529019
1761749
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
janaiyengar
2018-01-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/V1h5N1nOPULScNyNI2FYPmX5x0I/
2529018
1761749
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
MikkelFJ
2018-01-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ZkioQz3VMKzgjjpDvhaElAu9pZs/
2529017
1761749
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are random packet number skips still relevant for opportunistic ACK protection? (#1030)
janaiyengar
2018-01-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/P2y-rTZTBn1JZekotebnPafO61A/
2529016
1761749
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-ID in Transport Parameters? (#1023)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is zero a valid stream-ID in Transport Parameters? (#1023)
janaiyengar
2018-01-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/8CcKiZaXH8RpOJqdj3lyNbaOpZw/
2529014
1761159
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify some PMTU language (#1037)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify some PMTU language (#1037)
janaiyengar
2018-01-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/60cmMy1N9lWzQm0zmVtJUBOCRmo/
2529008
1763065
[quicwg/base-drafts] f8425c: Clarify some PMTU language (#1037)[quicwg/base-drafts] f8425c: Clarify some PMTU language (#1037)
martinduke
2018-01-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/9Tkncog2FEMbJcUfg6BLoKfV3ew/
2529007
1764076
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify some PMTU language (#1037)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify some PMTU language (#1037)
janaiyengar
2018-01-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/SLbnaGlJPzuvn5uHKWgunSb7rgc/
2529006
1763065
[quicwg/wg-materials] 1cea71: adjust agenda ordering[quicwg/wg-materials] 1cea71: adjust agenda ordering
Mark Nottingham
2018-01-12
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/-QeQ66buoVnuI_boxHjpxQwG7y4/
2528665
1763965
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number rework (#1048)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number rework (#1048)
hardie
2018-01-11
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/kqkAxtj4__oOdyM1cw1Mgfidv1U/
2528509
1763742
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mask packet numbers with a per-connection-ID key (#1043)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mask packet numbers with a per-connection-ID key (#1043)
Martin Thomson
2018-01-10
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/XYvwh-llHq2mnbtauUEpD4ynI0I/
2528019
1763401
[quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number rework (#1048)[quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number rework (#1048)
Martin Thomson
2018-01-10
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/wPhNDTOtM5fhEG4RgInWeZd99OQ/
2528018
1763742
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Invariant: the first packet on a connection uses the long header (#1040)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Invariant: the first packet on a connection uses the long header (#1040)
Mike Bishop
2018-01-10
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/WLb1mdQ3ZQfRSAufoy8U0g1hABg/
2527952
1763374
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Change connection ID with Transport Parameters (#1041)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Change connection ID with Transport Parameters (#1041)
Martin Thomson
2018-01-10
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/-dinutskzDUS9MIQmITl--hZXco/
2527892
1763377
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit, 2018 edition (#1046)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit, 2018 edition (#1046)
Brian Trammell
2018-01-10
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/G3bLBQ0pr7KNI40YAeCRAlxxhgA/
2527768
1763475
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#989)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#989)
Brian Trammell
2018-01-10
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/hciqXf74CkckCXf8vEUYBvWnHZc/
2527759
1759337
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit, 2018 edition (#1046)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit, 2018 edition (#1046)
Brian Trammell
2018-01-10
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/dV55oixyltFu1oK37xsi800_eDE/
2527706
1763475