Subject
From
Date
List
[sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] SWID/CoSWID AD review edits (#32)[sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] SWID/CoSWID AD review edits (#32)
David Waltermire
2020-10-27
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/cj8zlXfzouc7lO-8hr8C31_YG84/
2947447
1919779
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] SWID/CoSWID AD review edits (#32)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] SWID/CoSWID AD review edits (#32)
David Waltermire
2020-11-02
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/HGASewlf64o-6NLLny44aoDN4N4/
2957550
1919779
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] SWID/CoSWID AD review edits (#32)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] SWID/CoSWID AD review edits (#32)
David Waltermire
2020-11-02
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/zG3BWac2PKLWv38FogiMuyhxeRQ/
2957551
1919779
[sacm] sacm - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 109[sacm] sacm - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 109
"IETF Secretariat"
2020-10-23
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/LxgUYzVOekzTQVWpnjd4Oindz3k/
2946154
1919320
[sacm] Early AD review of draft-ietf-sacm-arch-07[sacm] Early AD review of draft-ietf-sacm-arch-07
Roman Danyliw
2020-10-19
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/_xyWm13lx1gpa8_Hrx0XclDH4aI/
2944072
1918446
[sacm] definining a /.well-known value for an SBOM[sacm] definining a /.well-known value for an SBOM
Michael Richardson
2020-10-16
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/cvkKpSOMlrKDJjE-up7PD-0lgMM/
2943227
1918109
[sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] rel type should be int rather than uint (#31)[sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] rel type should be int rather than uint (#31)
Thomas Fossati
2020-10-14
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/HpHIVsoLeswGWD5xzYewOWuNIQw/
2941888
1917646
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] rel type should be int rather than uint (#31)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] rel type should be int rather than uint (#31)
Henk Birkholz
2020-10-28
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/H6706L9skPGOpRyFMBldKs87hKM/
2948056
1917646
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] rel type should be int rather than uint (#31)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] rel type should be int rather than uint (#31)
David Waltermire
2021-02-18
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/yLhLHsFnXjkavMdRLfT9gZp5jIQ/
2998899
1917646
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] rel type should be int rather than uint (#31)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] rel type should be int rather than uint (#31)
David Waltermire
2021-02-22
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/Pr4TWJLyZ3VIDL4by5E4AEUoRrg/
3000928
1917646
[sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] small typo in payload-or-evidence (#30)[sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] small typo in payload-or-evidence (#30)
Thomas Fossati
2020-10-14
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/svkF10try-CNwoKKt-Rxf_EQfLI/
2941864
1917639
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] small typo in payload-or-evidence (#30)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] small typo in payload-or-evidence (#30)
Henk Birkholz
2020-10-28
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/bQsbMobQ1V4iCLxfLG33-8gWjVA/
2948057
1917639
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] small typo in payload-or-evidence (#30)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] small typo in payload-or-evidence (#30)
Henk Birkholz
2020-10-28
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/GDkHQ4HRatnRQyPwA2h4RQIRzIM/
2948058
1917639
[sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)[sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
Thomas Fossati
2020-10-14
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/xhEY1bDYyOhXbwCKD1GSiX-hB90/
2941775
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
cabo
2020-10-14
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/6KuVgdgibuNRLRhD6Ew7Tvr5sGQ/
2941785
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
Thomas Fossati
2020-10-14
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/ULb5d1G8FZ5fWswQ45s5e693DzM/
2941807
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
Henk Birkholz
2020-10-28
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/QcymzkJZ1nLKxgW4yKNl2caBA70/
2948070
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
cabo
2020-10-28
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/14neQZFoxvOpiKqPXiNhPFkWbw4/
2948091
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
Henk Birkholz
2020-10-28
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/oE_4iXek8OBwLhr29dtYbQFhmNs/
2948092
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
cabo
2020-10-28
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/Qq1zKxkKxjXt36KcfTJY9pXqkgI/
2948093
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
Henk Birkholz
2020-10-28
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/UO7Fdc9uvOU6WgR0Mi89lMIuNQQ/
2948099
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
cabo
2020-10-28
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/fyskUsVBhmapHRcn4PyQtvY-WXU/
2948100
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
Henk Birkholz
2020-10-28
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/QkSE_nxPQ2aLw7G3IRBiyjQOk_Q/
2948125
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
Thomas Fossati
2020-10-29
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/m0eFfyG3AfmFu9osly3SRfA2dOE/
2955503
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
David Waltermire
2021-02-18
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/rxQxy2KUrlc2WPVmzTAj7F8ECMk/
2998898
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
Henk Birkholz
2021-02-18
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/_Iz7Ko0xADDCGpqoAkTnyCXxCDE/
2998954
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
cabo
2021-02-18
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/RcXR50HPqH76l3XT7JA-H3qACwE/
2998961
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
cabo
2021-02-18
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/JdgjUkbx0jBXC9hxP2gl9DEOiEM/
2998962
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
Henk Birkholz
2021-02-18
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/pkZ7hThItYPCVRQmXB-j0s_9Jls/
2998965
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
Henk Birkholz
2021-02-18
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/dX8TtkoYjWA0YySC5Q5-UlN7G9k/
2998967
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
cabo
2021-02-18
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/zNhZyVS9bHwE8bEwFv_bDI-dmNg/
2998974
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
Henk Birkholz
2021-02-18
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/ydus3Aj9aOnsiHvH1r4Z23mi34I/
2998981
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
David Kemp
2021-02-18
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/cI3S5W_3zkM1ImJD8Snb8uGzyg0/
2999072
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
Henk Birkholz
2021-02-18
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/c3nK7cjH1iYekEdGhbB4--1gXdU/
2999109
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
David Kemp
2021-02-18
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/ENxH9gqAddiaGs0Xg6JZ5T6QUso/
2999123
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
David Kemp
2021-02-19
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/2PAc380zsSeiMRy0jMLbzwJdypI/
2999536
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
Henk Birkholz
2021-02-19
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/luDzB36j21gj_f8mf8FWYgTRLN0/
2999546
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
cabo
2021-02-19
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/X2KVuVCNbkqGAtfnKVDxWEsT4vA/
2999626
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
Henk Birkholz
2021-02-21
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/pgZQ0q9Qim64JGnqdpUL_g0T4X0/
3000245
1917605
[sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] Missing hash description in resource-collection (#28)[sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] Missing hash description in resource-collection (#28)
Thomas Fossati
2020-10-12
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/wbKCNt_4HwOOCGcIB1QZQpZnDTw/
2941028
1917347