Re: [TLS] Verify data in the RI extension?Re: [TLS] Verify data in the RI extension?
Martin Rex
2009-11-27
tls
/arch/msg/tls/RWJBRYOyf49XqGmB4Nbf8g3EoKU/
1430592
1642628
Re: [TLS] Verify data in the RI extension?Re: [TLS] Verify data in the RI extension?
Eric Rescorla
2009-11-27
tls
/arch/msg/tls/ChBpHacoSM5Z2LUtj4DEE2w5smU/
1430591
1642628
Re: [TLS] Verify data in the RI extension?Re: [TLS] Verify data in the RI extension?
Martin Rex
2009-11-27
tls
/arch/msg/tls/v57qJWxdTgJomAiLFAYSgszfkdk/
1430590
1642628
Re: [TLS] Verify data in the RI extension?Re: [TLS] Verify data in the RI extension?
Eric Rescorla
2009-11-27
tls
/arch/msg/tls/Ghs_8U55iO03WQ5-YtweepktnW8/
1430589
1642628
Re: [TLS] Verify data in the RI extension?Re: [TLS] Verify data in the RI extension?
Stefan Santesson
2009-11-27
tls
/arch/msg/tls/ryVY3AKMAyhUaH4Lxh2zgK-GNB8/
1430588
1642628
Re: [TLS] Verify data in the RI extension?Re: [TLS] Verify data in the RI extension?
Eric Rescorla
2009-11-27
tls
/arch/msg/tls/gJxTt0_INzVGOjNROg8mgQ_y2Dw/
1430587
1642628
Re: [TLS] Verify data in the RI extension?Re: [TLS] Verify data in the RI extension?
Stefan Santesson
2009-11-27
tls
/arch/msg/tls/729MJYt5vtpK_d1-x8K29r4A0Ms/
1430586
1642628
Re: [TLS] Verify data in the RI extension?Re: [TLS] Verify data in the RI extension?
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
2009-11-27
tls
/arch/msg/tls/HTC9xlX38kc_eofmkXtsTjCAkS8/
1430585
1642628
Re: [TLS] Verify data in the RI extension?Re: [TLS] Verify data in the RI extension?
Martin Rex
2009-11-27
tls
/arch/msg/tls/-NME603OJQ96YmEUGR8fdR9NNkw/
1430584
1642628
Re: [TLS] Verify data in the RI extension?Re: [TLS] Verify data in the RI extension?
Pasi.Eronen
2009-11-27
tls
/arch/msg/tls/7f9jYGrsOtA6F9KjXsPzIAgFRrI/
1430583
1642628
Re: [TLS] Verify data in the RI extension?Re: [TLS] Verify data in the RI extension?
Pasi.Eronen
2009-11-27
tls
/arch/msg/tls/jGj7FlG1wc3cuD16yerAeU-5H24/
1430582
1642628
Re: [TLS] Quest for Unified Solution to TLS RenegotiationRe: [TLS] Quest for Unified Solution to TLS Renegotiation
Martin Rex
2009-11-27
tls
/arch/msg/tls/lp8CjsHBYZ8djM0Vr8XYyHLfViU/
1430581
1642629
Re: [TLS] Verify data in the RI extension?Re: [TLS] Verify data in the RI extension?
Blumenthal, Uri - 0662 - MITLL
2009-11-27
tls
/arch/msg/tls/ob-007qf8_aL67qEap0_YXmIyIo/
1430580
1642623
Re: [TLS] Quest for Unified Solution to TLS RenegotiationRe: [TLS] Quest for Unified Solution to TLS Renegotiation
Blumenthal, Uri - 0662 - MITLL
2009-11-27
tls
/arch/msg/tls/j9iXuVlXFQSTwdJwj1b90wBzp_A/
1430579
1642629
Re: [TLS] Verify data in the RI extension?Re: [TLS] Verify data in the RI extension?
Stefan Santesson
2009-11-27
tls
/arch/msg/tls/Q23_tsYofQL4zBveUHBzmiDrMdQ/
1430578
1642628
Re: [TLS] Verify data in the RI extension?Re: [TLS] Verify data in the RI extension?
Simon Josefsson
2009-11-27
tls
/arch/msg/tls/498CQi82JNBJlxqEOFX50wZ3Q-Q/
1430577
1642628
Re: [TLS] Verify data in the RI extension?Re: [TLS] Verify data in the RI extension?
Pasi.Eronen
2009-11-27
tls
/arch/msg/tls/27SKfh1ZaCTjLZPCCNg2iTbBSiA/
1430576
1642628
Re: [TLS] Verify data in the RI extension?Re: [TLS] Verify data in the RI extension?
Stefan Santesson
2009-11-27
tls
/arch/msg/tls/kPkWZobtqM2LMXv6wloeAOUBQCc/
1430575
1642628
Re: [TLS] What would be the point of removing signalling in TLS 1.3?Re: [TLS] What would be the point of removing signalling in TLS 1.3?
Stefan Santesson
2009-11-27
tls
/arch/msg/tls/tBhrID4jRkQde3caaQksIxlQdDM/
1430574
1642628
Re: [TLS] Quest for Unified Solution to TLS RenegotiationRe: [TLS] Quest for Unified Solution to TLS Renegotiation
Nelson B Bolyard
2009-11-27
tls
/arch/msg/tls/iu1WfbYCZDFAnFsBI1j1O32G7P4/
1430573
1642629
Re: [TLS] Quest for Unified Solution to TLS RenegotiationRe: [TLS] Quest for Unified Solution to TLS Renegotiation
Nelson B Bolyard
2009-11-27
tls
/arch/msg/tls/RZAJX76geA4upY4V_QPUPbT7Rbo/
1430572
1642629
Re: [TLS] What would be the point of removing signalling in TLS 1.3?Re: [TLS] What would be the point of removing signalling in TLS 1.3?
Nelson B Bolyard
2009-11-27
tls
/arch/msg/tls/8SWHk1CwRc0LuFINVLpVAPLC8y8/
1430571
1642628
Re: [TLS] Perhaps there's another way. Was: Verify data in the RI extension?Re: [TLS] Perhaps there's another way. Was: Verify data in the RI extension?
Nelson B Bolyard
2009-11-27
tls
/arch/msg/tls/f2twI58BPKqb3140nkRAFkUElpc/
1430570
1642628
Re: [TLS] some questions for your draftRe: [TLS] some questions for your draft
Nelson B Bolyard
2009-11-27
tls
/arch/msg/tls/SRutwjwFQvNI1JD3nSDbQe5UYhQ/
1430569
1642630
Re: [TLS] Proposal for hybrid solution using most of the ideasRe: [TLS] Proposal for hybrid solution using most of the ideas
Nelson B Bolyard
2009-11-27
tls
/arch/msg/tls/Wf-NXtRmjNzkShnox0Q4maak8PM/
1430568
1642645
Re: [TLS] What would be the point of removing signalling in TLS 1.3?Re: [TLS] What would be the point of removing signalling in TLS 1.3?
Blumenthal, Uri - 0662 - MITLL
2009-11-26
tls
/arch/msg/tls/g873dqR5WhRyCQV_j3lYj8ENIHg/
1430567
1642624
Re: [TLS] Quest for Unified Solution to TLS RenegotiationRe: [TLS] Quest for Unified Solution to TLS Renegotiation
Yoav Nir
2009-11-26
tls
/arch/msg/tls/YRHlLQeEZVsANmzA2pTpbP-e1uo/
1430566
1642629
Re: [TLS] What would be the point of removing signalling in TLS 1.3?Re: [TLS] What would be the point of removing signalling in TLS 1.3?
Bodo Moeller
2009-11-26
tls
/arch/msg/tls/Ok7O5BD2NnGMgFHZueNei1TdCD8/
1430565
1642628
Re: [TLS] What would be the point of removing signalling in TLS 1.3?Re: [TLS] What would be the point of removing signalling in TLS 1.3?
Marsh Ray
2009-11-26
tls
/arch/msg/tls/FT4vQy0lxmYtn4IiCaKfV6xx7ak/
1430564
1642628
Re: [TLS] some questions for your draftRe: [TLS] some questions for your draft
Marsh Ray
2009-11-26
tls
/arch/msg/tls/G4D_q_T9aMmd2t0BU4CDSYSj1DM/
1430563
1642630
Re: [TLS] What would be the point of removing signalling in TLS 1.3?Re: [TLS] What would be the point of removing signalling in TLS 1.3?
Stefan Santesson
2009-11-26
tls
/arch/msg/tls/DAnejyI-7HYuqqPl1jKTfgIg6k0/
1430561
1642628
Re: [TLS] Consensus Call for draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation-00.txtRe: [TLS] Consensus Call for draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation-00.txt
Bodo Moeller
2009-11-26
tls
/arch/msg/tls/_J8Q2FVF0xSsuh5IFOhtrJgq8dY/
1430562
1642640
Re: [TLS] some questions for your draftRe: [TLS] some questions for your draft
Martin Rex
2009-11-26
tls
/arch/msg/tls/LDFWYMrltVxKkNFDFL-Zh5by4qs/
1430560
1642630
Re: [TLS] Quest for Unified Solution to TLS RenegotiationRe: [TLS] Quest for Unified Solution to TLS Renegotiation
Stephen Farrell
2009-11-26
tls
/arch/msg/tls/M7O_OlCI6x58DYzgfhgBa4oS3Uc/
1430559
1642629
Re: [TLS] some questions for your draftRe: [TLS] some questions for your draft
Marsh Ray
2009-11-26
tls
/arch/msg/tls/gSqQoFj8WF775K5KrXfoBiOlCtI/
1430558
1642630
Re: [TLS] Quest for Unified Solution to TLS RenegotiationRe: [TLS] Quest for Unified Solution to TLS Renegotiation
David-Sarah Hopwood
2009-11-26
tls
/arch/msg/tls/Hi8fPVGfDbXGZ0SiBA8IKX79QoI/
1430557
1642629
Re: [TLS] Quest for Unified Solution to TLS RenegotiationRe: [TLS] Quest for Unified Solution to TLS Renegotiation
Blumenthal, Uri - 0662 - MITLL
2009-11-26
tls
/arch/msg/tls/L0_VsltCThPsEleeIPmW5NRForA/
1430556
1642629
Re: [TLS] Quest for Unified Solution to TLS RenegotiationRe: [TLS] Quest for Unified Solution to TLS Renegotiation
David-Sarah Hopwood
2009-11-26
tls
/arch/msg/tls/IobcBCR0yYgcZ1LVI3VYNrifyyM/
1430555
1642629
[TLS] Alternative to continuing the handshake hash[TLS] Alternative to continuing the handshake hash
Michael D'Errico
2009-11-26
tls
/arch/msg/tls/y8OHTBa2Zb3ln88me1SaF2HaI6U/
1430554
1642625
Re: [TLS] Perhaps there's another way. Was: Verify data in the RI extension?Re: [TLS] Perhaps there's another way. Was: Verify data in the RI extension?
Dr Stephen Henson
2009-11-26
tls
/arch/msg/tls/OFAF09hv4D_J7Ci3OsBWwfoJw24/
1430553
1642628
40 Messages