Subject
From
Date
List
[Trans] [trans] #69 (client-behavior): old data name (sha256_root_hash) in 3.6[Trans] [trans] #69 (client-behavior): old data name (sha256_root_hash) in 3.6
trans issue tracker
2015-03-06
trans
/arch/msg/trans/6EKg-ZBi9E1avzqovtnakWZQgSw/
1909389
1646692
Re: [Trans] [trans] #69 (rfc6962-bis): old data name (sha256_root_hash) in 3.6Re: [Trans] [trans] #69 (rfc6962-bis): old data name (sha256_root_hash) in 3.6
trans issue tracker
2015-06-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/6MU9Z7ZHdc0PlUcV0zwEQQrkp5s/
2044093
1646692
Re: [Trans] [trans] #69 (rfc6962-bis): old data name (sha256_root_hash) in 3.6Re: [Trans] [trans] #69 (rfc6962-bis): old data name (sha256_root_hash) in 3.6
trans issue tracker
2015-07-06
trans
/arch/msg/trans/Ho3Z5C1SMCJD_nKK7pC4bB8BOsc/
2046924
1646692
Re: [Trans] [trans] #69 (rfc6962-bis): old data name (sha256_root_hash) in 3.6Re: [Trans] [trans] #69 (rfc6962-bis): old data name (sha256_root_hash) in 3.6
trans issue tracker
2015-07-06
trans
/arch/msg/trans/GThz1TTGJBNaBDpgv6GezojPwGU/
2047328
1646692
[Trans] [trans] #68 (client-behavior): specification of sha-256 for the SCT[Trans] [trans] #68 (client-behavior): specification of sha-256 for the SCT
trans issue tracker
2015-03-06
trans
/arch/msg/trans/xjfOtcJ4gccz5dbGQ7epf-ogPpw/
1909383
1646693
Re: [Trans] [trans] #68 (rfc6962-bis): specification of sha-256 for the SCTRe: [Trans] [trans] #68 (rfc6962-bis): specification of sha-256 for the SCT
trans issue tracker
2015-06-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/UPM7egoRsffIgM_SJt4K7v61Fnc/
2044094
1646693
Re: [Trans] [trans] #68 (rfc6962-bis): specification of sha-256 for the SCTRe: [Trans] [trans] #68 (rfc6962-bis): specification of sha-256 for the SCT
trans issue tracker
2015-07-06
trans
/arch/msg/trans/AvPZcow8Hun_tbroBqttuzPXJIw/
2046920
1646693
Re: [Trans] [trans] #68 (rfc6962-bis): specification of sha-256 for the SCTRe: [Trans] [trans] #68 (rfc6962-bis): specification of sha-256 for the SCT
trans issue tracker
2015-07-06
trans
/arch/msg/trans/qYNq2x4F2xtFdvfdsH1qeQ-utwk/
2047331
1646693
[Trans] [trans] #67 (rfc6962-bis): no specification of how a log advertises the max cert chain length it will accept[Trans] [trans] #67 (rfc6962-bis): no specification of how a log advertises the max cert chain length it will accept
trans issue tracker
2015-03-06
trans
/arch/msg/trans/Q46gR2pwIF3cFkn4iHtFbiSF6hw/
1909378
1646694
Re: [Trans] [trans] #67 (rfc6962-bis): no specification of how a log advertises the max cert chain length it will acceptRe: [Trans] [trans] #67 (rfc6962-bis): no specification of how a log advertises the max cert chain length it will accept
trans issue tracker
2015-03-06
trans
/arch/msg/trans/NoW1E0jqGJsc4-jdx6xQ-Nyt0F4/
1909461
1646694
Re: [Trans] [trans] #67 (rfc6962-bis): no specification of how a log advertises the max cert chain length it will acceptRe: [Trans] [trans] #67 (rfc6962-bis): no specification of how a log advertises the max cert chain length it will accept
trans issue tracker
2015-03-06
trans
/arch/msg/trans/a0YO1AIkcIdHkdrPoqqSU95slcw/
1909529
1646694
[Trans] [trans] #66 (client-behavior): revise the description of what logs MAY do re cert syntax checking[Trans] [trans] #66 (client-behavior): revise the description of what logs MAY do re cert syntax checking
trans issue tracker
2015-03-06
trans
/arch/msg/trans/gmjCKroRVjuJi-ytOgyuk5FcH-M/
1909374
1646695
[Trans] [trans] #65 (client-behavior): remove section 5.4 and reference to "Auditor" in section 3[Trans] [trans] #65 (client-behavior): remove section 5.4 and reference to "Auditor" in section 3
trans issue tracker
2015-03-06
trans
/arch/msg/trans/8HC0U9wuviflCobg8bAM-JFWe_4/
1909370
1646696
Re: [Trans] [trans] #65 (rfc6962-bis): remove section 5.4 and reference to "Auditor" in section 3Re: [Trans] [trans] #65 (rfc6962-bis): remove section 5.4 and reference to "Auditor" in section 3
trans issue tracker
2015-06-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/c0xsyS2raHo0XdhqAqa-HVYq_aQ/
2044052
1646696
Re: [Trans] [trans] #65 (rfc6962-bis): remove section 5.4 and reference to "Auditor" in section 3Re: [Trans] [trans] #65 (rfc6962-bis): remove section 5.4 and reference to "Auditor" in section 3
trans issue tracker
2015-07-06
trans
/arch/msg/trans/Sp3lsaP3QIuW9rtIX0rdh2zhx1g/
2046772
1646696
Re: [Trans] [trans] #65 (rfc6962-bis): remove section 5.4 and reference to "Auditor" in section 3Re: [Trans] [trans] #65 (rfc6962-bis): remove section 5.4 and reference to "Auditor" in section 3
Stephen Kent
2015-07-06
trans
/arch/msg/trans/GDFxW25AFK2sTWPNx-YYQqZnEMg/
2046999
1646696
Re: [Trans] [trans] #65 (rfc6962-bis): remove section 5.4 and reference to "Auditor" in section 3Re: [Trans] [trans] #65 (rfc6962-bis): remove section 5.4 and reference to "Auditor" in section 3
Salz, Rich
2015-07-06
trans
/arch/msg/trans/adBgTEb1RehijlRivci3bcHpdiw/
2047012
1646696
Re: [Trans] [trans] #65 (rfc6962-bis): remove section 5.4 and reference to "Auditor" in section 3Re: [Trans] [trans] #65 (rfc6962-bis): remove section 5.4 and reference to "Auditor" in section 3
trans issue tracker
2015-07-06
trans
/arch/msg/trans/yXuoPcKxq9CmgFucVJ5AUh9cUfQ/
2047319
1646696
[Trans] [trans] #64 (client-behavior): remove specification of signature and hash lags from section 2[Trans] [trans] #64 (client-behavior): remove specification of signature and hash lags from section 2
trans issue tracker
2015-03-06
trans
/arch/msg/trans/CpXJqZ6PKzMJyVL9Ciu_5GreV3g/
1909366
1646697
Re: [Trans] [trans] #64 (rfc6962-bis): remove specification of signature and hash lags from section 2Re: [Trans] [trans] #64 (rfc6962-bis): remove specification of signature and hash lags from section 2
trans issue tracker
2015-06-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/ilBtNcPwqnyYht3khhEWk1xDJtw/
2044078
1646697
Re: [Trans] [trans] #64 (rfc6962-bis): remove specification of signature and hash lags from section 2Re: [Trans] [trans] #64 (rfc6962-bis): remove specification of signature and hash lags from section 2
trans issue tracker
2015-07-23
trans
/arch/msg/trans/Kcr_AjUFNWEbFSV3gt4ViWMOS8w/
2058193
1646697
Re: [Trans] [trans] #64 (rfc6962-bis): remove specification of signature and hash lags from section 2Re: [Trans] [trans] #64 (rfc6962-bis): remove specification of signature and hash lags from section 2
trans issue tracker
2015-11-03
trans
/arch/msg/trans/-YQEWjNkAwPiNJmx1hz7_fvukyQ/
2108565
1646697
[Trans] [trans] #63 (client-behavior): remove all normative references to client behavior[Trans] [trans] #63 (client-behavior): remove all normative references to client behavior
trans issue tracker
2015-03-06
trans
/arch/msg/trans/j70Y-eHeuyvmkBsHff-qNi8X6R0/
1909362
1646698
Re: [Trans] [trans] #63 (rfc6962-bis): remove all normative references to client behaviorRe: [Trans] [trans] #63 (rfc6962-bis): remove all normative references to client behavior
trans issue tracker
2015-06-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/_nLv49nmWAlnCGoop7FFwQ-FT9E/
2044073
1646698
Re: [Trans] [trans] #63 (rfc6962-bis): remove all normative references to client behaviorRe: [Trans] [trans] #63 (rfc6962-bis): remove all normative references to client behavior
trans issue tracker
2015-07-06
trans
/arch/msg/trans/8wiHIQlXO1N6SA_IY2SSAYRGo-E/
2046792
1646698
Re: [Trans] [trans] #63 (rfc6962-bis): remove all normative references to client behaviorRe: [Trans] [trans] #63 (rfc6962-bis): remove all normative references to client behavior
Stephen Kent
2015-07-06
trans
/arch/msg/trans/-daCdycuPZpxiPrteD9dF6wFBoA/
2047009
1646698
Re: [Trans] [trans] #63 (rfc6962-bis): remove all normative references to client behaviorRe: [Trans] [trans] #63 (rfc6962-bis): remove all normative references to client behavior
trans issue tracker
2015-07-06
trans
/arch/msg/trans/UkRZK58_LlQxWmaij5gJ5_PsBuI/
2046793
1646698
Re: [Trans] [trans] #63 (rfc6962-bis): remove all normative references to client behaviorRe: [Trans] [trans] #63 (rfc6962-bis): remove all normative references to client behavior
Stephen Kent
2015-07-06
trans
/arch/msg/trans/vgo5X4meDHluuvFbjN0gbtXMDrQ/
2047013
1646698
Re: [Trans] [trans] #63 (rfc6962-bis): remove all normative references to client behaviorRe: [Trans] [trans] #63 (rfc6962-bis): remove all normative references to client behavior
trans issue tracker
2015-07-06
trans
/arch/msg/trans/vD4eBaCoYvQxR8Dccm5dpLwz_Po/
2047323
1646698
[Trans] [trans] #62 (rfc6962-bis): change title for section 1[Trans] [trans] #62 (rfc6962-bis): change title for section 1
trans issue tracker
2015-03-06
trans
/arch/msg/trans/XXZ0rft053VJZXDdGRFIG4IQ9Is/
1909356
1646699
Re: [Trans] [trans] #62 (rfc6962-bis): change title for section 1Re: [Trans] [trans] #62 (rfc6962-bis): change title for section 1
trans issue tracker
2015-03-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/_Sjto8jICSeel9pt9czZHS5OJVk/
1910718
1646699
Re: [Trans] [trans] #62 (rfc6962-bis): change title for section 1Re: [Trans] [trans] #62 (rfc6962-bis): change title for section 1
trans issue tracker
2015-03-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/Y2N1SYz7hiSv2EvUKeOLP63QgHk/
1910730
1646699
[Trans] comments on -05 (Section 3)[Trans] comments on -05 (Section 3)
Stephen Kent
2015-03-05
trans
/arch/msg/trans/qDq5iXqDE41FF-JbRWWVLT51H44/
1908864
1646700
[Trans] comments on -05 (Abstract, Section 1 and Section 2)[Trans] comments on -05 (Abstract, Section 1 and Section 2)
Stephen Kent
2015-03-05
trans
/arch/msg/trans/IydNRSU2nfqGRmf2-thfdzAJ1zY/
1908861
1646701
Re: [Trans] comments on -05 (Abstract, Section 1 and Section 2)Re: [Trans] comments on -05 (Abstract, Section 1 and Section 2)
Ben Laurie
2015-03-06
trans
/arch/msg/trans/loim55X4_0u9MN9vhf3toITgKrk/
1909306
1646701
Re: [Trans] comments on -05 (Abstract, Section 1 and Section 2)Re: [Trans] comments on -05 (Abstract, Section 1 and Section 2)
Stephen Kent
2015-03-06
trans
/arch/msg/trans/lREO8yHjdfUpFERv8-TeP4rLMxE/
1909412
1646701
Re: [Trans] comments on -05 (Abstract, Section 1 and Section 2)Re: [Trans] comments on -05 (Abstract, Section 1 and Section 2)
Ben Laurie
2015-03-06
trans
/arch/msg/trans/mIuj_4eKXb_Wct6zfOBB8EPDJOw/
1909423
1646701
Re: [Trans] comments on -05 (Abstract, Section 1 and Section 2)Re: [Trans] comments on -05 (Abstract, Section 1 and Section 2)
Ben Laurie
2015-03-06
trans
/arch/msg/trans/HX64vE7rDa9U5VssLL5If-BTg5s/
1909458
1646701
Re: [Trans] [trans] #9 (rfc6962-bis): Security Considerations for number and variety of SCTsRe: [Trans] [trans] #9 (rfc6962-bis): Security Considerations for number and variety of SCTs
trans issue tracker
2015-03-05
trans
/arch/msg/trans/DFj_etALX9b_o-nybdzZUOzZrjE/
1908428
1646702
Re: [Trans] [trans] #9 (rfc6962-bis): Security Considerations for number and variety of SCTsRe: [Trans] [trans] #9 (rfc6962-bis): Security Considerations for number and variety of SCTs
trans issue tracker
2015-03-05
trans
/arch/msg/trans/Eq_mh0ptpRvs8pdN6OEXnl_TdWM/
1908679
1646702