Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Fernando Gont
2019-02-26
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/IHOx6iuj08N_WBx4jbv_cnKQu_g/
2697968
1825008
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Tim Chown
2019-02-26
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/ofg4kl38n0Q-FvJmAknwFFxHuZo/
2697961
1825008
Re: [v6ops] inputs on NAT64/464XLAT Deployment Guidelines in Operator and Enterprise Networks draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deploymentRe: [v6ops] inputs on NAT64/464XLAT Deployment Guidelines in Operator and Enterprise Networks draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
2019-02-26
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/Y4XbUphDYukTZ0gEcLC3iWB0cPc/
2697846
1828102
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Fernando Gont
2019-02-25
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/mmZ5CdcaWv55ce2CYYT6MgAnJZk/
2697651
1825008
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Fernando Gont
2019-02-25
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/SkB3h4iEbopjQhyJebvEutKq-vQ/
2697644
1825008
Re: [v6ops] inputs on NAT64/464XLAT Deployment Guidelines in Operator and Enterprise Networks draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deploymentRe: [v6ops] inputs on NAT64/464XLAT Deployment Guidelines in Operator and Enterprise Networks draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment
Alejandro D'Egidio
2019-02-25
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/oVy9logLcPiHHi1WOGDcFOo0LIg/
2697544
1828102
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
STARK, BARBARA H
2019-02-25
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/w6uPEH8K8RQl3VglcZyxRoD-LVk/
2697513
1825008
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Lorenzo Colitti
2019-02-25
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/6O27CCUFfDwuvU3Umd6KISPRt8g/
2697490
1825008
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Mark Smith
2019-02-25
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/Gt4DIZnwvh3fyUd9QlNI6HzyO_E/
2697474
1825008
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Richard Patterson
2019-02-25
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/ApIAr9PuAEcaolnswwtfI1jaGBw/
2697421
1825008
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Ted Lemon
2019-02-23
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/rIX5WYmfZKtJXTM1gCRA1EhjYoA/
2697001
1825008
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Fernando Gont
2019-02-23
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/kgecUCQvHo8DGHfofS5twMDzPm0/
2696991
1825008
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Lee Howard
2019-02-23
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/IN05NxeVhcNDk4QziH1a2OC4PFI/
2696966
1825008
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Ted Lemon
2019-02-23
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/oCc6cenYVVJ03w4MN4l0vKaWtuE/
2696963
1825008
Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)
Fernando Gont
2019-02-23
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/ONYrok_5wUOVTOxVCYJvWaE4TZY/
2696933
1825008
Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)
Fernando Gont
2019-02-23
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/Y5EbyVRxbgIny3r652nmyjcA5UI/
2696914
1825008
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Fernando Gont
2019-02-23
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/0wF-r3IRdNppedWeqt6xdjckqvc/
2696912
1825008
Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)
Fernando Gont
2019-02-23
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/_AErOVL9-niUGlQSRDNtelhlXgc/
2696910
1825008
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Fernando Gont
2019-02-23
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/WPFplNX_tyQokl4-E9ccN61qIqw/
2696908
1825008
Re: [v6ops] Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: [v6ops] Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Tom Herbert
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/LamEMWfrEPsmRBlMOKx1PZvnL5I/
2696752
1825008
Re: [v6ops] Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: [v6ops] Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Ca By
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/Bouk_M5dp66Pb-g1PQvr1iV5rwI/
2696746
1825008
Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)
Owen DeLong
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/S3FpD0b3a4goe56KvGzTCO0FwkY/
2696741
1825008
Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)
Lee Howard
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/eQTZ401DxPEMLz0F7Ldf-898m-s/
2696731
1825008
Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)
David Farmer
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/PStG15sE_9G06j4TEsuvQL6QsYc/
2696727
1825008
Re: [v6ops] Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: [v6ops] Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Michael Richardson
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/NqsZ42KGBbmQCjt8RycCmXmjvVM/
2696724
1825008
Re: [v6ops] Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: [v6ops] Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Tom Herbert
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/TmiEjzYP9xy-LZFQK8g2aTsRaF8/
2696679
1825008
Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)
Lee Howard
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/vdg9lVXHiqxkA-msUn_boDyUotY/
2696673
1825008
Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)
Lee Howard
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/uPV_8io578PYQ6kX54Gklso5hO4/
2696667
1825008
Re: [v6ops] Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: [v6ops] Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Ca By
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/oyIXi4IcPSg7XfkhQtkykurSeYQ/
2696658
1825008
Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)
David Farmer
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/4Teh_2fhw7x0tbUsjNProdZlq6s/
2696650
1825008
Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)
Timothy Winters
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/etpEvj-Zk0XS2Rp61-xI5mn1bXc/
2696646
1825008
Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)
Tim Chown
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/iKh4WCvDQtSv2du2OAVL5ltv2Qc/
2696642
1825008
Re: [v6ops] Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: [v6ops] Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Tom Herbert
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/skQ3TLbQ3U1WzKgyIUKujZmmnIU/
2696629
1825008
Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)
Michael Richardson
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/tq457w5P1bkjYqNJqv39LeemCj0/
2696623
1825008
Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)
Owen DeLong
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/_otaKlTKnEiAewNrP_V6UNZD-tc/
2696622
1825008
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Christian Huitema
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/q4c52Vqkumb96Y6pvGr_ItODWXI/
2696611
1825008
[v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)[v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)
Lee Howard
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/LsQhggz4vPO-cvwkNs0gYcbMqCU/
2696599
1825008
Re: [v6ops] 464XLAT -- Re: NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: [v6ops] 464XLAT -- Re: NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Ca By
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/yiEE3a41RuSUVsP79Lw8tZxuRlo/
2696527
1825008
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Nick Hilliard
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/Zjut9Y__6I7oWRj47OEGMpf2gTU/
2696498
1825008
[v6ops] 464XLAT -- Re: NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)[v6ops] 464XLAT -- Re: NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Lencse Gábor
2019-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/KjWllF3VvILlXJlusD6z5kffWT0/
2696467
1825008