Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficientRe: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
James Woodyatt
2015-03-26
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/xVjwkuEQuWt7tLTLZGLlnpr9WGc/
1923191
1659642
Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?
Alexandru Petrescu
2015-03-26
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/x7fDs7_gEtHwKy1NbzDqraOO85U/
1923170
1659648
Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?
Philip Matthews
2015-03-26
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/rd5aYnHC8rtL3bb_CY1yTbsJNOk/
1923164
1659648
[v6ops] Verification on the list[v6ops] Verification on the list
Fred Baker (fred)
2015-03-26
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/wy7LcPceZ9k2uOt72VUfEhJDuSo/
1923160
1659639
Re: [v6ops] Discussion: IPv4 as a ServiceRe: [v6ops] Discussion: IPv4 as a Service
Fred Baker (fred)
2015-03-26
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/7JY41iVCH2NNxMSR2kjOzRCnwnc/
1923076
1659640
Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?
Owen DeLong
2015-03-26
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/hU4lq2LVz_iuDDc_lZutkW6GYoA/
1922856
1659648
Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?
Howard, Lee
2015-03-26
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/s_6ZYEIBapgX8285uqHjreFdvKA/
1922806
1659648
Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficientRe: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
Erik Kline
2015-03-26
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/QP_VhIKwOKVReONhZsFwVkUiyXU/
1922778
1659642
Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficientRe: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
Bjoern A. Zeeb
2015-03-26
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/XsVqXJxnMzrAGXJ3yjuyrwtV3AY/
1922776
1659642
Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?
Owen DeLong
2015-03-26
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/6wquWrSbr_-QuxYsjAQefxXhfBg/
1922775
1659648
Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficientRe: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
Tore Anderson
2015-03-26
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/7d4L5jtR-U55LQF8_tONIbfnK5s/
1922756
1659642
Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficientRe: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
Lorenzo Colitti
2015-03-26
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/pk3J-a4ORi1xSWVeYVArz-w8eYs/
1922674
1659642
Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficientRe: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
Metzler, Dan J
2015-03-26
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/hX_AL_EquKfTHzLUnnZ_v82Y1nc/
1922662
1659642
Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficientRe: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
James Woodyatt
2015-03-26
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/5bYswt5Ld18mhwrKq9gOcVVamZ0/
1922625
1659642
Re: [v6ops] IPv6 EHs in the Real World (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world-02.txt)Re: [v6ops] IPv6 EHs in the Real World (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world-02.txt)
Merike Kaeo
2015-03-26
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/BVVh1VUPAMezMOIwLuOTdhk0sYw/
1922529
1659649
Re: [v6ops] IPv6 EHs in the Real World (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world-02.txt)Re: [v6ops] IPv6 EHs in the Real World (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world-02.txt)
Jen Linkova
2015-03-26
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/eKvJ4N6FNATXruQpqw6Zw10shVw/
1922447
1659649
Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?
Jen Linkova
2015-03-26
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/vOVl9tV6sph_aP6nygHICJ2mnhc/
1922439
1659648
Re: [v6ops] IPv6 EHs in the Real World (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world-02.txt)Re: [v6ops] IPv6 EHs in the Real World (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world-02.txt)
Merike Kaeo
2015-03-26
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/d5Fqjaylv7bvA5plE5Yu6Rcixr0/
1922438
1659649
Re: [v6ops] IPv6 EHs in the Real World (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world-02.txt)Re: [v6ops] IPv6 EHs in the Real World (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world-02.txt)
Merike Kaeo
2015-03-26
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/ioX25YVwTHqmn_8a1gYtq9CfB54/
1924125
1659649
Re: [v6ops] IPv6 EHs in the Real World (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world-02.txt)Re: [v6ops] IPv6 EHs in the Real World (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world-02.txt)
Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
2015-03-26
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/g7y0nYrl2g-Uebfwr0T_MW3elsE/
1922422
1659649
Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?
Templin, Fred L
2015-03-26
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/3xJ5PAeuC_N1-h5dMYwVdlZ1QQc/
1922366
1659648
Re: [v6ops] Existing work on Softwire Deployment ExperiencesRe: [v6ops] Existing work on Softwire Deployment Experiences
Xing Li
2015-03-26
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/PbN6hQ4Ot6Jua7T_oOc4Bd6FPbI/
1922321
1659641
Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?
Howard, Lee
2015-03-26
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/bdGTRzD1a77lX5UEXfwwTb53MM0/
1922308
1659648
Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?
Tore Anderson
2015-03-26
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/XgPLRiPBl60euxLVV1OpPa6QM3U/
1922259
1659648
Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficientRe: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
Mark Andrews
2015-03-26
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/sJt1fTzA8vbXTqEks-jMBD88KZc/
1922204
1659642
Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficientRe: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
Ca By
2015-03-26
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/puys5EjGfOuULqBIGIkJt_1vHXI/
1922170
1659642
Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficientRe: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
Andrew 👽 Yourtchenko
2015-03-26
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/2j-i0Tpf_x5nVbM2YU1mMpEb8js/
1922138
1659642
[v6ops] Discussion: IPv4 as a Service[v6ops] Discussion: IPv4 as a Service
Fred Baker
2015-03-25
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/aL238t2K9Tu8pv_chsCIWpQV6-4/
1922104
1659640
Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?
Ted Lemon
2015-03-25
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/xYV5jdH5LPHVOTNlb2SUJ-2m5ao/
1921922
1659648
Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?
Richard Hartmann
2015-03-25
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/azxW0hi9TJaVGTraE9qx9w9kq3o/
1921902
1659648
[v6ops] Existing work on Softwire Deployment Experiences[v6ops] Existing work on Softwire Deployment Experiences
Ian Farrer
2015-03-25
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/7ICZFlKw11jMU_zs8uprNTyMNlg/
1921777
1659641
Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?
Ted Lemon
2015-03-25
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/hBf9J5M9ExjfnRd1A-_wSTgcX4s/
1921646
1659648
Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?
Richard Hartmann
2015-03-25
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/p_2M3s8lTe-V33-HSoNBA9Oaa5Q/
1921629
1659648
Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?
Owen DeLong
2015-03-25
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/e0G5S_-4ZjBQXO6BoYzUTmU6j24/
1921616
1659648
Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficientRe: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
Czerwonka Michał 1 - Hurt
2015-03-25
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/o6poDmyt-Ujzxun0ydlmwEkGaQQ/
1921219
1659642
Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficientRe: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
Tore Anderson
2015-03-25
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/vmQ-Rwsj1bsKDD2BFj9VNY9XZfU/
1921190
1659642
Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficientRe: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
James Woodyatt
2015-03-24
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/PE8TK3AC-O5gODq3KYVq9fnPl4A/
1920966
1659642
Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?
Philip Matthews
2015-03-24
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/jDqQamGXyXONnuwkobE0VlfIh4Y/
1920607
1659648
Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficientRe: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
Brian E Carpenter
2015-03-24
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/pcFHCTsskDVznkZ2YpwXQ0YjhkE/
1920463
1659642
Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficientRe: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
Ca By
2015-03-24
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/fYMu8JE7UNG6EJAUqSpfNEOn07w/
1920394
1659642