Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Yoav Nir
2013-08-12
websec
/arch/msg/websec/N_rsrjCf-08wqvfNmDFd-0_xS2c/
1505279
1665095
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Trevor Perrin
2013-08-11
websec
/arch/msg/websec/Lwr8-0zitQ58J07YMuYf92L9kcI/
1505278
1665095
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Yoav Nir
2013-08-11
websec
/arch/msg/websec/PSOk6NUvxZakiw92Ata_wUfj5tQ/
1505277
1665095
Re: [websec] #59: Is the interaction between pre-loaded pins and dynamic pins clear?Re: [websec] #59: Is the interaction between pre-loaded pins and dynamic pins clear?
websec issue tracker
2013-08-11
websec
/arch/msg/websec/QgN7P8-z1CEwVbRhJcxs1YsnS-I/
1505276
1665093
[websec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-08.txt[websec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-08.txt
internet-drafts
2013-08-11
websec
/arch/msg/websec/ioQ1rs-HlPslrkZgSLXUZStu6MI/
1505274
1665088
[websec] New Version Notification - draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-08.txt[websec] New Version Notification - draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-08.txt
internet-drafts
2013-08-11
websec
/arch/msg/websec/smxp6OcRM8INyX8fVhfQYiNOwuo/
1505275
1665087
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Trevor Perrin
2013-08-11
websec
/arch/msg/websec/Vp0bgcW7BXTCWiBf-s1e9eOkYx0/
1505273
1665095
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Yoav Nir
2013-08-11
websec
/arch/msg/websec/BI37UlzE2EcW2TQZuWsCReKFWt4/
1505272
1665095
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Trevor Perrin
2013-08-11
websec
/arch/msg/websec/WIyXvXFEVH_Lg1yQVRvu-31I6UU/
1505271
1665095
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Tobias Gondrom
2013-08-11
websec
/arch/msg/websec/TcRSqckX5qD28q3UjpzJV0IiimM/
1505270
1665095
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Trevor Perrin
2013-08-11
websec
/arch/msg/websec/PRFpqa-tY-E_UKNHPCh3_-KYrjU/
1505269
1665095
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Tobias Gondrom
2013-08-11
websec
/arch/msg/websec/E7lll-lOQcD6nTq_KFy1lQCtLMw/
1505268
1665095
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Trevor Perrin
2013-08-11
websec
/arch/msg/websec/Rb_YsyJY4iShqf0WtzXfTDrY2YA/
1505267
1665095
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2013-08-10
websec
/arch/msg/websec/jhqNIWnE-hHbs1P9TkgvgkNCDbo/
1505266
1665095
[websec] Fwd: Genart LC review: draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-07[websec] Fwd: Genart LC review: draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-07
Robert Sparks
2013-08-09
websec
/arch/msg/websec/n6Mb6MIA0qQGujJiA93e3V6xGpg/
1505265
1665089
Re: [websec] Well-known URIsRe: [websec] Well-known URIs
Mark Nottingham
2013-08-09
websec
/arch/msg/websec/JXkOCm6np0SfRE4YO1yHBEuSxU4/
1505264
1665091
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Gervase Markham
2013-08-09
websec
/arch/msg/websec/WxmzCllQnb-nYy79c9Vp9BXcOqU/
1505262
1665095
Re: [websec] Well-known URIsRe: [websec] Well-known URIs
Yoav Nir
2013-08-08
websec
/arch/msg/websec/1Bg4qEwOuiJfjifL5NK21hsKRG8/
1505261
1665091
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Tobias Gondrom
2013-08-08
websec
/arch/msg/websec/3zpR66gybIJB2Gbsey4wFE62WRs/
1505260
1665095
[websec] ID Tracker State Update Notice: <draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-07.txt>[websec] ID Tracker State Update Notice: <draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-07.txt>
IETF Secretariat
2013-08-08
websec
/arch/msg/websec/96Bn_oEbihqr5e8Ym45Sdnbgokk/
1505263
1665090
Re: [websec] Well-known URIsRe: [websec] Well-known URIs
Chris Palmer
2013-08-08
websec
/arch/msg/websec/J3b-IGLOgoGz3YXoMjmYZjx90Dg/
1505259
1665091
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Yoav Nir
2013-08-08
websec
/arch/msg/websec/sOoWmibEVq7ClwzwK27FfBUQ6zs/
1505258
1665095
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Chris Palmer
2013-08-08
websec
/arch/msg/websec/CVOTLLrjLLQZ2W-7dJG7RakXlDQ/
1505257
1665095
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Chris Palmer
2013-08-08
websec
/arch/msg/websec/ItG5r2dyklarabnEwK1ltc0zDRw/
1505256
1665095
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Yoav Nir
2013-08-08
websec
/arch/msg/websec/3gRcmwk9BiLD9Hy_2ur6rNHCu-Q/
1505255
1665095
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Chris Palmer
2013-08-08
websec
/arch/msg/websec/xJr8GQfGaQ_72ihLRDGKpejBZSU/
1505254
1665095
Re: [websec] Well-known URIsRe: [websec] Well-known URIs
Yoav Nir
2013-08-08
websec
/arch/msg/websec/J91rfihlZJMUx1SLyl-lFG4qEpc/
1505253
1665091
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Chris Palmer
2013-08-08
websec
/arch/msg/websec/fQFVYIYJ_XI_HkhKyP8zEEXfjhw/
1505252
1665095
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Tobias Gondrom
2013-08-08
websec
/arch/msg/websec/G2XCndGgdLET2hGUIbE8fcjSl9I/
1505251
1665095
Re: [websec] Well-known URIsRe: [websec] Well-known URIs
Chris Palmer
2013-08-08
websec
/arch/msg/websec/iqJfTcg-VSwIJiGCFH7zz7I2Fwo/
1505250
1665091
[websec] Well-known URIs[websec] Well-known URIs
Mark Nottingham
2013-08-08
websec
/arch/msg/websec/lx2ZHQKTlxd8JE9diQvaYJP4k-c/
1505249
1665091
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Yoav Nir
2013-08-08
websec
/arch/msg/websec/nhKWQ6lA_vZG6_qYZ8xm0mQge2E/
1505248
1665095
Re: [websec] #60: Well Known URIs vs Response HeadersRe: [websec] #60: Well Known URIs vs Response Headers
Trevor Perrin
2013-08-08
websec
/arch/msg/websec/7D5BOuMQoeUVrNYvEowdNoSDft0/
1505247
1665092
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Trevor Perrin
2013-08-08
websec
/arch/msg/websec/hhq6avxlrYLNnsKVucuSQNA9fEQ/
1505246
1665095
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Yoav Nir
2013-08-07
websec
/arch/msg/websec/Wyyhx5_fxo445NTxFhCdXpAs_DY/
1505245
1665095
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Jeremy Rowley
2013-08-07
websec
/arch/msg/websec/OmEdeBkyVMbAHm2Q9piIFG_NoE4/
1505244
1665095
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Gervase Markham
2013-08-07
websec
/arch/msg/websec/Mn1wN4NoGACINv6XIfRQbCWufRE/
1505243
1665095
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Jeremy Rowley
2013-08-07
websec
/arch/msg/websec/rwMod2J9U2tpUyjNFQ_lo-Slck8/
1505242
1665095
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Gervase Markham
2013-08-07
websec
/arch/msg/websec/0yD1TfFTUft9w0OqHCgmhLO1ppw/
1505241
1665095
Re: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also namesRe: [websec] #58: Should we pin only SPKI, or also names
Trevor Perrin
2013-08-07
websec
/arch/msg/websec/KCMf2ZdDByIiRJ4VPlz18jq3Oeo/
1505240
1665095