IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [100attendees] Long taxi itinerary from IETF hotel to airport

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Thu, 18 January 2018 12:35 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 100attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 100attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5020712D946 for <100attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 04:35:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E_4e4_-1TH5O for <100attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 04:35:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr0-x234.google.com (mail-wr0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C894F126D3F for <100attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 04:35:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr0-x234.google.com with SMTP id 100so22354635wrb.7 for <100attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 04:35:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=rCndqjxqC+YGgXMjCmlNs0DqGwdLWsS5goVcX1O8wKA=; b=Giu2hb7Aik+hiGX+cqWcgVmxG7pMUOXPlL0BTSSUip+x7RqCzBpf94mx07+yXQTcdR 5rqiOCd70ygF7sXY4n6orvLFMcJ0lcBd8n4269IUQAaqMGDzfKfZjNJpXpZ2poZvs5Tm aTg4FdqZ3Tknb9xCDiHTzE63X17fysudgWmWU5nNxzTRuVLWTo1F3Wi7CMmpbbksKC/6 hVx9eivjzI1DDwminxhm6llipAf8I8V4bHjFDeGadOfUOAoYlyuPASNy2q4ZcMRJCvU5 sm90jqs144M+KoxgkUS6WVEBkOT64L3R/ubnu2faG49OWd+BH0Nwug5zRbxy92A5mr3I G1AQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=rCndqjxqC+YGgXMjCmlNs0DqGwdLWsS5goVcX1O8wKA=; b=Mg9vjuAKXf9OxLiYhMrbMBwNGBkqVtmOrNsNkLt+rorQBAB8IVKn6eNeFc/TttPg/U q00kWfjMyBy6omwffuzsBHfIO9V8H9rcuMENMyH4bKE9H5UW/HprBdvuGmX3xWtETidd S0Oof0WFQ414wwd/Qhi2edid5bRdvt9FWhRp0l+lHEmtpAmqWC9G/3henklUEC+HLSv+ vtaw0xLsmBLi8KX9QYbrdcF/11TNvWxrXEFgO50wKtAHvDUQgpcHX7QaZSdF0KWKRbD4 Sp7bJXOR8iZNzNep2xGC+CC+z+gSITDk1SRvW/y2V+xlvpKcVHslFF9D3ROYH3b29/z6 PcCg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytf0vx+Cv0F+tl4R9Dazu3QbWrVAowPieRV0CHa5rSGkhCJIjI+Z 5gfAMFLXRPb1pLwSmNbbt/JBbf19
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBou8AQhP6OHN9qZ8f65WBNJQBurvDwX9Z0K/78IUZ28nLC4qM06hahS0bxFk+qalvtfmm5jYzA==
X-Received: by 10.223.144.195 with SMTP id i61mr6509174wri.73.1516278900148; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 04:35:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.126] (host213-123-124-182.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [213.123.124.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i203sm5587814wmf.34.2018.01.18.04.34.58 for <100attendees@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 18 Jan 2018 04:34:59 -0800 (PST)
To: 100attendees@ietf.org
References: <6449c459-68e5-4fa2-911b-db3cb3d96b80@cea.fr> <7F2A899D-40C3-47CD-A805-5AFF943ABE42@cisco.com> <34351_1511016093_5A10469C_34351_14465_1_d9b4cc17-c882-3f91-9743-0520838871f9@cea.fr> <b00579b3-cb77-398f-f71f-bb4fef17cd18@cea.fr> <CAHkmkwtecuypVwszefVWe6JeKLNdO-8NE8xSjX=8U+r-iVstwQ@mail.gmail.com> <49171_1511250201_5A13D919_49171_12611_4_4dc8165d-7c2a-4f17-e551-df5cfa711624@cea.fr> <2a7e1dba-9a23-f7bb-532a-07d6ce86a27d@cea.fr> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711251804460.32099@uplift.swm.pp.se> <41893_1512308702_5A23FFDD_41893_19001_1_608b66f0-8bc9-3f43-2d2b-cc79bba7a463@cea.fr> <43545_1512468375_5A266F97_43545_3189_3_53699b1c-2ca2-67ef-b1c5-c73a0afd81db@cea.fr> <10010_1514546205_5A46241C_10010_16012_1_00de851e-e8c5-ee37-cf32-c4b340ae8aac@cea.fr> <fb213537-9126-b65e-1d81-8f9a23baa5c9@cea.fr> <bbf9d244-707f-bcc8-f7fe-8d6c3e7d9236@gont.com.ar>
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <bf7db0b7-017b-6942-354b-16467756d05f@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 12:34:56 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <bbf9d244-707f-bcc8-f7fe-8d6c3e7d9236@gont.com.ar>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/100attendees/30oa15Fkz8485W7vmRrbQ-YJmTI>
Subject: Re: [100attendees] Long taxi itinerary from IETF hotel to airport
X-BeenThere: 100attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 100 attendees that have opted in on this list." <100attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/100attendees>, <mailto:100attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/100attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:100attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:100attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/100attendees>, <mailto:100attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 12:35:04 -0000


On 18/01/2018 10:02, Fernando Gont wrote:
> On 01/18/2018 06:47 AM, Alexandre PETRESCU wrote:
>> Today LTA informs me that they warned the driver and that in the future
>> more severe action would be taken if he fails again.
>>
>> It is interesting to remark how LTA formalizes this offence, that I
>> agree with: "failing to proceed to destination by shortest and most
>> direct route, [...]  under rule 23(1)(c) of Road Traffic [...] Rules".
>>
>> (it  makes wonder whether IETF has an RFC that recommends that IP paths
>> should be shortest.)
> At times it requires good traffic engineering to properly deliver the
> passengers -- "shortest" path could be congested :-)
>

In FRR you might take a longer path in order to cater the possibility 
that a node rather than a link might have failed.

Stewart

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email