Re: [104attendees] Hilton Honors points lower than expected?

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Wed, 03 April 2019 08:20 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: 104attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 104attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D5412000E for <104attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 01:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yejpU0b2PWwi for <104attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 01:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from emh03.mail.saunalahti.fi (emh03.mail.saunalahti.fi [62.142.5.109]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CABF41201CA for <104attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 01:20:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eggert.org (unknown [62.248.255.8]) by emh03.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E8DC40027; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 11:20:41 +0300 (EEST)
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <BFDF69C1-EA13-44F8-81FF-421C0CFF26DB@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E61F724D-24B8-4E8C-8877-EB363F6D44D5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.8\))
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 10:18:06 +0200
In-Reply-To: <B2D36E0C-085F-4511-AB81-271FD0408EA5@consulintel.es>
Cc: 104 attendees <104attendees@ietf.org>
To: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <6585C597-2FFD-4B2D-926C-1B43994A183D@eggert.org> <B2D36E0C-085F-4511-AB81-271FD0408EA5@consulintel.es>
X-MailScanner-ID: 74FB1874D6B.A5B21
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/104attendees/FBlR_Of4dwtznH-qYTWcClSHeaQ>
Subject: Re: [104attendees] Hilton Honors points lower than expected?
X-BeenThere: 104attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of all 104 attendees for official communication <104attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/104attendees>, <mailto:104attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/104attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:104attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:104attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/104attendees>, <mailto:104attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 08:20:48 -0000

On 2019-4-3, at 10:07, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> I think I'm in the same situation, much less points than expected. I just sent a complain to HHonors.

Did you also see a "deposit" charged on your first or second day? Mine was more than 50% of the total bill, and I wonder if they "forgot" to include that in the base points calculation. (It would roughly correspond to the points discrepancy.)

Lars