Re: [118attendees] transcription :-)

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Thu, 09 November 2023 14:03 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Original-To: 118attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 118attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC31AC14CE39 for <118attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 06:03:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iL8dS2uH_RNd for <118attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 06:03:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (smtp.v6.rfc1035.com [IPv6:2001:4b10:100:7::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8041C14CF09 for <118attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 06:03:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (dhcp-8b9d.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.139.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 584572420E4A for <118attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 14:03:28 +0000 (UTC)
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6\))
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2023 14:03:27 +0000
References: <7ea472ec-61d5-444b-9864-46407b356141@joelhalpern.com> <00D46822-74F0-4284-A4CE-464ABD911D41@rfc1035.com> <C3CCF9E8-4BC8-424D-A621-BC2FC67AD24C@juniper.net>
To: "118attendees@ietf.org" <118attendees@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <C3CCF9E8-4BC8-424D-A621-BC2FC67AD24C@juniper.net>
Message-Id: <427C01A3-8887-43EE-A0ED-50EE85F83214@rfc1035.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.700.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/118attendees/FVrmQW5kkoNBL3wBrQo6M3nmuc4>
Subject: Re: [118attendees] transcription :-)
X-BeenThere: 118attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 118 attendees <118attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/118attendees>, <mailto:118attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/118attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:118attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:118attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/118attendees>, <mailto:118attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2023 14:03:30 -0000


> On 9 Nov 2023, at 13:03, John Scudder <jgs=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Maybe the 1.0 version of the effort hired steganographers instead of stenographers

Maybe they did. But that would be a secret. :-)

Wait a minute! Weren’t steganographers one of those dinosaurs in Jurassic Park?