Re: [69ATTENDEES] hand drums?

Michael Graff <michael_graff@isc.org> Fri, 27 July 2007 16:26 UTC

Return-path: <69attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IESeM-0003SD-6F; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:26:46 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IESeL-0003Ry-1S for 69attendees@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:26:45 -0400
Received: from white.flame.org ([204.152.186.144]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IESeJ-0008LQ-9P for 69attendees@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:26:44 -0400
Received: from white.flame.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by white.flame.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB18B327A74; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 09:26:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-17a8.ietf69.org (dhcp-17a8.ietf69.org [130.129.23.168]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by white.flame.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4601B327A72; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 09:26:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: Michael Graff <michael_graff@isc.org>
To: 69attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [69ATTENDEES] hand drums?
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:26:42 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7
References: <46A934DA.3000300@neustar.biz> <200707271106.25882.michael_graff@isc.org> <1ebc01c7d068$34956290$fb0111ac@china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <1ebc01c7d068$34956290$fb0111ac@china.huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200707271126.42247.michael_graff@isc.org>
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)
X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25
Cc:
X-BeenThere: 69attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: for attendees at 69th IETF <69attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/69attendees>, <mailto:69attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/69attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:69attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:69attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/69attendees>, <mailto:69attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: 69attendees-bounces@ietf.org

On Friday 27 July 2007 11:07:17 Spencer Dawkins wrote:
> Apparently the ruleset to detect "dirty bombs" still needs a little tuning,
> perhaps?

From what the talkative pre-TSA worker told me, the machines were used to scan 
incoming items for various military bases (well, that was the AI's purpose) 
and they got the machines from storage.  Among other things that it had 
detected shampoo/conditioner sets (it didn't expect to see two slightly 
different bottles) and any coiled wires (which it would call "springs.")

The first, and last, TSA agent I've actually enjoyed talking with.

--Michael

_______________________________________________
69ATTENDEES mailing list
69ATTENDEES@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/69attendees