Re: [6lo] Adoption call for draft-gomez-6lo-blemesh

Hi all,

I did not recognize blemesh for what it is.
This document is interesting because BT in general has a large 
industrial support.
It is very important that this document is written in collaboration with 
the BT sig.
Learning that this is indeed the case, I support the adoption of this 
document fully.

Peter

Yong-Geun Hong schreef op 2016-10-06 04:21:
> Hello All..
> 
> I support the adoption of this document.
> 
> We can use existing network topology of each 6lo link layer
> technologies but it is more better to explore network topology.
> In the 6lo-blemeth document, it enables IPv6 over BLE networks of a
> more complex topology than just the typical BLE star topology.
> I think that this kind of topology can enhance IoT services and use
> cases.
> 
> Best regards.
> 
> YongGeun.
> 
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 2:48 AM, samita Chakrabarti
> <samitac.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hello All:
>> 
>> We have discussed 6lo-blemesh at the IETF 96 6lo meeting and there
>> were interests in the WG to work on this draft.
>> 
>> The draft authors also have been requested to check with BTSIG and
>> BTSIG has been consulted.
>> 
>> We would like to proceed with the WG adoption call for this
>> document:
>> 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gomez-6lo-blemesh/ [1]
>> 
>> Please provide your opinion on the mailing list with  ‘Yes/No’
>> and a short note.
>> 
>> The adoption call ends on October 7, 2016.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Gabriel & Samita
>> 
>> 6lo-chairs
>> _______________________________________________
>> 6lo mailing list
>> 6lo@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo [2]
> 
> 
> 
> Links:
> ------
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gomez-6lo-blemesh/
> [2] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
> _______________________________________________
> 6lo mailing list
> 6lo@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo