IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lo] Adoption call for draft-gomez-6lo-blemesh

Yong-Geun Hong <yonggeun.hong@gmail.com> Thu, 06 October 2016 02:21 UTC

Return-Path: <yonggeun.hong@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6BB712945A for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 19:21:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pv-pnQKM1cdE for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 19:21:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x235.google.com (mail-wm0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7561A129444 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 19:21:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x235.google.com with SMTP id p138so17207025wmb.1 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 19:21:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=u/ZBsGIKe9UXHMEQnNLIs+Djw37q5nprFLBDCfmX7WA=; b=P9qJQYaz5+ELfqPky/T3nVEXpucWQCBDrmDlb3Ftq7v+nsca0GY55JV0Lx5ckXxQA5 n4G2lr+KcSne6GQWSMezkmLB6QrRe6zPD5QYbZMrCnFdigPgzFYmhP3P961RwhKSzYAi chfNgCxGdSn0iCl33UFoPSyHgt7hlTPtdYRoChI3TZYGz1nxGG04IxO+YtxcX3XkpDxX uIOCsxLlPqYeetwB+eTDXnzOW6wHR/7p1IeXL/A40f9RrYjxFQ0G4r8L8Xo9bt/YNGXa Cbyw8tALhGSzPeov5CRrft3+P1wHti51Br+WqthcjT+xK6AKLN1e7MVuwGMyQrlhhRZ7 uc3A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=u/ZBsGIKe9UXHMEQnNLIs+Djw37q5nprFLBDCfmX7WA=; b=HQ7fR4CCj+UznTmeMj7o3hErqFjhpCOc/9QFPqiZ23Q1GUxFvkGCGwMjn0OL7u2AZc awx/3IJZ9LL9SCd9rH3pOb+YPoSlqqqmBIz1Y7fF+eyA6rLgv9Ko3jqi3MHF3qCCIrW3 RAVc7jZk6MO4nsodrh7dwSS6On0VPKpqCtFeSwZIbReXawV2ZykoTIN9pQnuzKg1hPgq AjMHaxTgP8EjNWQfui6pzMrBvaf/3MRKduhyY+CUWHES09QzekyYmPlMOjzo8tKbq030 FvdOHwUh+/Mn5Ph210cs7myNSItAGBGc3tr3MK5Q5JYjky+KbS2lTe5WNbQb1aEdShD1 f/cw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rlewdru4dPYMV9/Y7M8Dz3socAdg0PH6KdyhtbwDFtWGp7PrtSVYGWju2E7nvLOF+AHIxjnVV4mpf6Gbw==
X-Received: by 10.194.68.106 with SMTP id v10mr10229942wjt.149.1475720504964; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 19:21:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.22.5 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 19:21:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <034501d21430$5608f8e0$021aeaa0$@gmail.com>
References: <034501d21430$5608f8e0$021aeaa0$@gmail.com>
From: Yong-Geun Hong <yonggeun.hong@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2016 11:21:44 +0900
Message-ID: <CACt2foFBLWWzaOnuMS1TfCRLXCea4hYNmhRAOVxG9m9WEgEowQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: samita Chakrabarti <samitac.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bd91ac07c7c2d053e28f4ee"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/dmFBjKDpB9Hu8I6MPAo_auW-F0w>
Cc: lo <6lo@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6lo] Adoption call for draft-gomez-6lo-blemesh
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2016 02:21:49 -0000

Hello All..

I support the adoption of this document.
We can use existing network topology of each 6lo link layer technologies
but it is more better to explore network topology.
In the 6lo-blemeth document, it enables IPv6 over BLE networks of a more
complex topology than just the typical BLE star topology.
I think that this kind of topology can enhance IoT services and use cases.

Best regards.

YongGeun.

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 2:48 AM, samita Chakrabarti <samitac.ietf@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> Hello All:
>
>
>
> We have discussed 6lo-blemesh at the IETF 96 6lo meeting and there were
> interests in the WG to work on this draft.
>
> The draft authors also have been requested to check with BTSIG and BTSIG
> has been consulted.
>
>
>
> We would like to proceed with the WG adoption call for this document:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gomez-6lo-blemesh/
>
>
>
>
>
> Please provide your opinion on the mailing list with  ‘Yes/No’ and a short
> note.
>
>
>
> The adoption call ends on October 7, 2016.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gabriel & Samita
>
> 6lo-chairs
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6lo mailing list
> 6lo@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email