Re: [6lo] New I-D draft-delcarpio-6lo-wlanah-00.txt - HC
Ines Robles <maria.ines.robles@ericsson.com> Thu, 18 June 2015 11:30 UTC
Return-Path: <maria.ines.robles@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4BD91A8908 for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 04:30:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jAfDkbfh5uM8 for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 04:30:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sessmg22.ericsson.net (sessmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.58]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 640CF1A88ED for <6lo@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 04:30:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3a-f79ec6d000006dc0-91-5582abc791fd
Received: from ESESSHC017.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by sessmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id A0.B2.28096.7CBA2855; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 13:30:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.lmf.ericsson.se (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.210.2; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 13:30:14 +0200
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se [131.160.33.3]) by mail.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 812EA1102A7; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 14:30:14 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <5582AC42.80101@ericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 14:32:18 +0300
From: Ines Robles <maria.ines.robles@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 6lo@ietf.org, alexandru.petrescu@DOMAIN.HIDDEN
References: <mailman.2570.1434619616.3530.6lo@ietf.org> <5582A0E6.6040901@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <5582A0E6.6040901@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010904010504080905090406"
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrOLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvre7x1U2hBsu7RSyapwhYbF8+l9WB yePDwV8sHkuW/GQKYIrisklJzcksSy3St0vgymj+O4m94IJqRe9BxwbGVTJdjJwcEgImEr8m nGKCsMUkLtxbz9bFyMUhJHCUUeJ801VWCGcDo8SKOY8YQaqEBNYxSuxuyAKxeQU0JZ5PuQvW zSKgKrHo7wmwGjYBI4mzH36ygdiiAiESE9d/Z4OoF5Q4OfMJC4gtImAmsebHGbBeZoEsia4L l8BqhAUcJdbsmMcOsStc4tebWWD1nAI6Eht2drNC1IdJnPzzlw2iRlti+tz7LBMYBWchWTEL SdksRg4g217iwdYyiLC8xPa3c5ghbH2J63fus8LEm7fOZl7AyLaKUbQ4tbg4N93ISC+1KDO5 uDg/Ty8vtWQTIzDkD275bbWD8eBzx0OMAhyMSjy8CmpNoUKsiWXFlbmHGKU5WJTEeWdszgsV EkhPLEnNTk0tSC2KLyrNSS0+xMjEwSnVwMjCzsH8yTZn7vtPc6QO3uJ57TnX5PfSC8u23THk vamnnFN+/Qx/qiNL/JrTJ9Tilhgxni+9xjiBc2dcDyez+OJbsiJFypzqc3rZC5eyL7hwWOq3 SdA5v4TrOy49DDK+WtPUZX4peDHrIkNPv5cHz13Miltc2uxU/jSEbcdeVy3dt3+6JCNi3iix FGckGmoxFxUnAgAk+vG1WgIAAA==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/0Et1YeX7Dch7mHQ90K_X3EBqGbc>
Cc: Roberto Morabito <roberto.morabito@ericsson.com>, Felipe Del Carpio <felipe.del.carpio@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [6lo] New I-D draft-delcarpio-6lo-wlanah-00.txt - HC
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 11:30:20 -0000
Hi Alex, I realized that you meant ROHC-TCP I found this implementation http://www.effnet.com/pages/uk/products_rohc_tcp.php, in the web page states: " Profiles: 0x0006 (ROHC-TCP) is supported." -> defined in IANA in 6846 Thanks, Ines On 06/18/2015 01:43 PM, Ines Robles wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Thank you for your feedback, please find answer below in [IR] > > > On 06/18/2015 12:26 PM, 6lo-request@ietf.org wrote: >> >> Ok, let me summarize instead of turning in circles: >> >> I would like to request a modification of that Internet Draft - >> please add a statement saying that the IPv6 Base Header is mandatory, >> in clear, in network byte order. >> > [IR] IPv6 is part of the stack proposed, sorry I do not understand > your point. Could you please clarify it. Thanks! > >> >> >> ROHC (RObust Header Compression RFC6846) is not applied to IP layer, >> as far as I know, but to upper layers. Despite being touted decades >> ago as absolutely necessary for WiFi and cellular, what we use today >> on these links is pure IP. > [IR]RFC 3843 defines ROHC for IP and an implementation can be found > here http://www.acticom.de/robust-header-compression-2/ > > > Thanks, > > Ines. > >> >
- Re: [6lo] New I-D draft-delcarpio-6lo-wlanah-00.t… Ines Robles
- Re: [6lo] New I-D draft-delcarpio-6lo-wlanah-00.t… Ines Robles
- Re: [6lo] New I-D draft-delcarpio-6lo-wlanah-00.t… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [6lo] New I-D draft-delcarpio-6lo-wlanah-00.t… Alexandru Petrescu