Re: [6lo] New I-D draft-delcarpio-6lo-wlanah-00.txt - HC

Ines Robles <maria.ines.robles@ericsson.com> Thu, 18 June 2015 10:41 UTC

Return-Path: <maria.ines.robles@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6AF91B308C for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 03:41:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d3v4f6Kr8Lmg for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 03:41:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F1F21A8898 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 03:41:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-f794d6d000004501-14-5582a06c164f
Received: from ESESSHC008.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by sessmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 86.85.17665.C60A2855; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 12:41:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.lmf.ericsson.se (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.44) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.210.2; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 12:41:47 +0200
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se [131.160.33.3]) by mail.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6495B1102A7; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 13:41:47 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <5582A0E6.6040901@ericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 13:43:50 +0300
From: Ines Robles <maria.ines.robles@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 6lo@ietf.org, alexandru.petrescu@DOMAIN.HIDDEN
References: <mailman.2570.1434619616.3530.6lo@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.2570.1434619616.3530.6lo@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020000040103050507040505"
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrOLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvrW7OgqZQg6UbtSyapwhYbF8+l9WB yePDwV8sHkuW/GQKYIrisklJzcksSy3St0vgyrjfd5WlYJN0xZEtT9gaGD+JdDFyckgImEhc e3KGDcIWk7hwbz2QzcUhJHCUUaLzcwMLhLOBUeL2+xtgVUIC6xglpk0JAbF5BbQl5r/bwgxi swioSjy48oARxGYTMJI4++EnWL2oQIjExPXf2SDqBSVOznzCAmKLCJhJrPlxhgnEZhbIkui6 cAmsRljAUWLNjnnsXYwcQLvMJQ4dkgMJcwpYSEyaMYUFojxM4vr72ywQ52hLTJ97n2UCo+As JBtmISmbBTSJWcBe4sHWMoiwvMT2t3OYIWx9iet37rPCxJu3zmZewMi2ilG0OLW4ODfdyFgv tSgzubg4P08vL7VkEyMw5A9u+a27g3H1a8dDjAIcjEo8vApqTaFCrIllxZW5hxilOViUxHln bM4LFRJITyxJzU5NLUgtii8qzUktPsTIxMEp1cDILFF5Mmle9zf+duYzyqf0nz113PYicU/Q 29udolYBaxPP3HPg1AlKSExUdLm0NW/7/Ltycewlxflzp12+wMUpsOXAKo2Pm/mM3BbEyKop S8/QCk33OZj0s8tJyN7zrf7Rz+EJIQ+v5Pub/1cT3GmYdizvRP7KuWzizSvPXwlQP/CURySs Z6sSS3FGoqEWc1FxIgAi/RlTWgIAAA==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/AGk8SDAmvUpRcC3PfIVHuP_oymU>
Cc: Roberto Morabito <roberto.morabito@ericsson.com>, Felipe Del Carpio <felipe.del.carpio@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [6lo] New I-D draft-delcarpio-6lo-wlanah-00.txt - HC
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 10:41:52 -0000

Hi Alex,

Thank you for your feedback, please find answer below in [IR]


On 06/18/2015 12:26 PM, 6lo-request@ietf.org wrote:
>
> Ok, let me summarize  instead of turning in circles:
>
> I would like to request a modification of that Internet Draft - please 
> add a statement saying that the IPv6 Base Header is mandatory, in 
> clear, in network byte order.
>
[IR] IPv6 is part of the stack proposed, sorry I do not understand your 
point. Could you please clarify it. Thanks!

>
>
> ROHC (RObust Header Compression RFC6846) is not applied to IP layer, 
> as far as I know, but to upper layers.  Despite being touted decades 
> ago as absolutely necessary for WiFi and cellular, what we use today 
> on these links is pure IP.
[IR]RFC 3843 defines ROHC for IP and an implementation can be found here 
http://www.acticom.de/robust-header-compression-2/


Thanks,

Ines.

>