IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lo] Draft wording for liaison statement

Robert Cragie <robert.cragie@gridmerge.com> Wed, 22 July 2015 17:02 UTC

Return-Path: <robert.cragie@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C5F31A8AFE for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:02:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5jnhnwJdlxnW for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:02:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x22b.google.com (mail-la0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED85A1A8711 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:02:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lahe2 with SMTP id e2so79465708lah.1 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:02:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=vj6icp4FoXdTd6eW/JbMqh39EtfcLT7DA4Nfi7czBmU=; b=hC6AfMWC7/Qbq0FIQfzyFCIie9gitTpmURYAUvgCm/ow7oJr0IdbUBNAC90a1VtG7s 7QqHPquqDeyC8o7oJfB//U+UT1+vpvObiZdOCZJH1IjljYaLbtzq0Ny4PBOfFvn0LBhn zHrp/oGBBvmtMFvGLk36UDuX3hAVPFM678M8Njrmus3TxWqjRAUYM8v5fcbQ9lui8Ty1 C7C3gvcboUCo4Lxzq+mV0W9TU2+zRsAXMClAmjUtFHxOpF8LE3h3J7T/P6KC3NlyWsCH ftnYN1T15X5gbjEqBMx+9QB2HRqIkaSDWRuYVxMoP4MFET5YEF5nug42n8PwD7ealm25 xQQA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.197.2 with SMTP id iq2mr3298765lac.103.1437584545291; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:02:25 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: robert.cragie@gmail.com
Received: by 10.25.31.75 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:02:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55AFCA2C.4060903@tzi.org>
References: <C67ABF34-1468-4580-B1CB-236000DF6A85@gmail.com> <55AE5B96.7030407@gmail.com> <CABOxzu1gqo3B3OMv-ZaRWwjg4SU1Sndq6oz7NjRn-scU4X9_kQ@mail.gmail.com> <55AF55C0.3030900@gmail.com> <CADrU+dJCnaZt0LROvRGJwonYmX88V4EXnRsisdDpXJAgpzbBGQ@mail.gmail.com> <55AF7D47.50307@gmail.com> <CADrU+d+5gA6RXyh7Jce2EymkoizF5HA+Ad5OW4SRzBVBvR6TJQ@mail.gmail.com> <55AFCA2C.4060903@tzi.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 18:02:25 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: rgnxcE4e9yZiDBWwK3CbdEYFnCQ
Message-ID: <CADrU+dL1KFe=P4ao2+MHU2WOjCXqkQPQDF9_+5QQFghT8HcVNA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Cragie <robert.cragie@gridmerge.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11340b062822e1051b79bc78"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/1Tdo4O2KXToIdjlpcAsd3uIyFnY>
Cc: "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6lo] Draft wording for liaison statement
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: robert.cragie@gridmerge.com
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:02:28 -0000

Thanks Carsten - I thought Alex was referring to the documents themselves
somehow.

I agree with what you say.

Robert

On 22 July 2015 at 17:51, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:

> Robert Cragie wrote:
> >     - why the description of the parameter for the IPv6 Header says
> >     RFC4944 instead of RFC2460?
> >
> >
> > <RCC>Please point out where you are referring to?</RCC>
>
>
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/_6lowpan-parameters/_6lowpan-parameters.xhtml
>
> It says 4944, because 4944 defines how IPv6 is encoded (uncompressed) in
> a 802.15.4 frame: The MAC payload begins with a dispatch byte (decimal
> 65), followed by the IP packet.  4944 says:
>
>    IPv6:  Specifies that the following header is an uncompressed IPv6
>       header [RFC2460].
>
> where 2460 is a normative reference.  This is all exactly as it should
> be (except that we have since learned it's not so bright to have both
> uncompressed and compressed alternatives available).
>
> Grüße, Carsten
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email