[6lo] Draft wording for liaison statement

Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 21 July 2015 10:34 UTC

Return-Path: <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 841B11B2D7F for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 03:34:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wUfRDgKCVqMM for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 03:34:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com (mail-wi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABE811B2D7E for <6lo@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 03:34:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wibud3 with SMTP id ud3so122889810wib.0 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 03:34:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:from:mime-version:subject :message-id:date:to; bh=g9isypwkTaJMlKnYWL0SdHM1Bm1WpCcG9nalkuWFRbA=; b=fqFgkfp0+Q+HWmDJuAJigTF2q23hYP5iJxd+zg4XDsQDQBqjuTMI/nfQS1dqBCByFS N6F0kmglkpvvmuAObMCk9xVOXryeDh5FLlDp2wzyC3cmSdcwlqwAh7iF8TXCfsONTwdz x0swsWasjRwxvEc81SrNEutJr9G0rgPa4ClswpYW+KwyvCMbybxZAO8P8k7sxcWhU5X7 n2pRMvJBt021NxOu2SS4A1PhxalxVShUdk7D4T39+cOwQpV3SQdU2q3cl3vP2f6mZwQg ls6WLCJS14dDHXzy80v4KVehJJ6e0ga6xtvuFijexNTU2W9/fxrkmvdGYZO2bgQa6xWe 1GeA==
X-Received: by 10.194.93.3 with SMTP id cq3mr64731900wjb.20.1437474846493; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 03:34:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [31.133.160.110] (dhcp-a06e.meeting.ietf.org. [31.133.160.110]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e7sm16102669wib.22.2015.07.21.03.34.05 for <6lo@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 21 Jul 2015 03:34:05 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-351D62D9-0114-4CFD-A585-C92E56A27C8F"
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Message-Id: <C67ABF34-1468-4580-B1CB-236000DF6A85@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 12:34:04 +0200
To: "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (12F69)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/BERuGu1ENOyw9Um_uyuZ09xa1ek>
Subject: [6lo] Draft wording for liaison statement
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 10:34:10 -0000

We held a hum regarding the content of a liaison statement to send to ITU-T SG15 in response to the recent liaison statement from SG15.  The WG has been asked to respond by Friday.  Included below is a rough transcription of the words I used in the hum yesterday.  Scott, Samita, Gabriel, James and I will write up the final liaison statement for transmission to SG-15 on Friday.  If you have any comments on the *content* (not the specific language, which we will likely rewrite) of the text, please comment to the list by Thursday.

-----

The IETF will not change the definitions of the code points specified in RFC 4944 and RFC 6282, as published in IANA registry "IPv6 Low Power Personal Area Network Parameters" <http://www.iana.org/assignments/_6lowpan-parameters/_6lowpan-parameters.xhtml>, in such a way as to affect the ITU-T G.9903 and G.9905 specifications.

The IETF 6lo working group offers to collaborate with ITU-T SG15 in establishing a new registry for the code points following the ESC dispatch code.  This new registry will be populated at the time of its establishment with the Command ID values as defined in G.9903 and G.9905.