[6lo] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-btle-17: (with COMMENT)

["Alissa Cooper" <[e-mail]>]

Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-6lo-btle-17: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-btle/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for all of your efforts and candid engagement to get my DISCUSS
points resolved. I have cleared the DISCUSS. I did notice one last edit
that should probably get made so that Section 5 is consistent with the
new text in Section 3.2.2, but will leave it to you to decide whether you
want to make the change.

In Section 5:

OLD
For non-link local
   addresses implementations have a choice to support, for example,
   [I-D.ietf-6man-default-iids], [RFC3315], [RFC3972], [RFC4941],
   [RFC5535], or [RFC7217].

NEW
For non-link local
   addresses, implementations are recommended not to embed
   the Bluetooth device address in the IID by default and instead
support, for example,
   [RFC3315], [RFC3972], [RFC4941],
   [RFC5535], or [RFC7217].