IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lo] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-rfc6775-update-17: (with COMMENT)

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Wed, 04 April 2018 15:43 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1421312DA0A; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 08:43:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v1NNA62N9YvG; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 08:43:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F8BE12DA3E; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 08:43:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3276; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1522856604; x=1524066204; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=Bo9x0V0vrlT0jlgWOrEJYoE3KWqcp6FyfyuJTM93dMM=; b=IsmbxIH3IYA5n+ohZSSKuF2Vs8BLqFLjTTGTEn9t83kaPVr874+SOacM cktlRNGbCGj/6R5UcyBxlbV/J2iZh3QJmtajqzO6FA7Ze72YBBIsUT6nA nSV3RkksstBN3+vD7SmJS4tmoX6VVTAzTL/QhUoX2FTq42hGyw5RGMLTe 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DNAADo8cRa/4sNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYNCYW8oCoNViACNCIF0gQ+SVRSBZgsYC4RgAhqEJiE0GAECAQEBAQEBAmwcDIUiAQEBAQMBASEROgsFBwQCAQgRBAEBAwImAgICJQsVBQMIAgQBDQUIEYR0D6thghyIQYIgBYEJhlmBVD+BDIMEgxEBAQECAYElARIBgx+CVAKHI4klhnYIAoVRiFaBOoNZglmEWIFphT2Bb4ZBAhETAYEkARw4YVgRCHAVOoJDgiAXEYhIhT5vARCLKoEfgRcBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.48,407,1517875200"; d="scan'208";a="94433616"
Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Apr 2018 15:43:23 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (xch-aln-005.cisco.com [173.36.7.15]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w34FhNRh030708 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 4 Apr 2018 15:43:23 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (173.36.7.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 10:43:22 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 10:43:22 -0500
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "6lo-chairs@ietf.org" <6lo-chairs@ietf.org>, "Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com" <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>, "draft-ietf-6lo-rfc6775-update@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6lo-rfc6775-update@ietf.org>, "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [6lo] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-rfc6775-update-17: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHTzBJL3Ddz3d/ChkmnQCl99hAAJaPwof9w
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 15:42:56 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 15:42:52 +0000
Message-ID: <a872afbc3a0d4c0f8d832d7660ef8317@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
References: <152284569850.23908.14329708504144370214.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <152284569850.23908.14329708504144370214.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.55.22.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/7gNIc2pxryR8CYGei1AhVwrUJXc>
Subject: Re: [6lo] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-rfc6775-update-17: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 15:43:31 -0000

Hello Mirja:

Thanks a bunch for your review! Let's see below:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 6lo <6lo-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Mirja Kühlewind
> Sent: mercredi 4 avril 2018 14:42
> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: 6lo-chairs@ietf.org; Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com; draft-ietf-6lo-
> rfc6775-update@ietf.org; 6lo@ietf.org
> Subject: [6lo] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-rfc6775-update-
> 17: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-6lo-rfc6775-update-17: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory
> paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-rfc6775-update/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I believe this document would have been easier to read for me if section 6
> would have been before section 4; however, I guess that's a matter of taste.
[PT>] You made me think. Some text is in place for historic reasons but overgrew over time.
Section 5 was really about updating RFC 7400. 
After a suggested renaming, I found it made more sense to move it in the backward compatibility section.
Then I looked at section 6 and found no objection moving it up. If that makes life easier for the reader, so be it : )
One thing leading to another I found some duplication between ex section 5 and 6 that I eliminated with a minimum restructuring.
I hope the result is more readable :)
> 
> On the TID in section 6.1: Should this field be zero if the T flag is not set?
> I guess you should at least say that the field should be ignored if the T flag is
> not set.
> 

[PT>] Sure, I added that text there and in the EARO section as well. It is all now section 4.

Many thanks!

Take care,

Pascal

> _______________________________________________
> 6lo mailing list
> 6lo@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email