[6lo] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-rfc6775-update-17: (with COMMENT)

[Mirja Kühlewind <[e-mail]>]

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-6lo-rfc6775-update-17: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-rfc6775-update/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I believe this document would have been easier to read for me if section 6
would have been before section 4; however, I guess that's a matter of taste.

On the TID in section 6.1: Should this field be zero if the T flag is not set?
I guess you should at least say that the field should be ignored if the T flag
is not set.