IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lo] WG adoption of draft-ietf-6man-6lobac

Kerry Lynn <kerlyn@ieee.org> Thu, 07 November 2013 17:37 UTC

Return-Path: <kerlyn2001@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38D1611E8229 for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 09:37:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.928
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.928 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.049, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZP0d2u5iLMGJ for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 09:37:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22b.google.com (mail-ob0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43DAD11E8210 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 09:37:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-f171.google.com with SMTP id gq1so377151obb.16 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 09:37:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=3axWc5hSZDC5TCsLIcEGCPzobY08mk4RfboCfPGTBq8=; b=RTaQuJNY9FbbSRukkP8LsdBj+lYDEDaj2xxH+BlIaPZBhMupDtlzi8dMshHiFIEK9C 70HORkoRe+P7/f6sD4306/1vOsX1scX4uVLYkDNGQnyek8pKnVBUsRZ9/zG5RPWwjT3L gMNapJnmoI6/HSQJHI5V5vS2Ix8Kl5HBwX2kG0DQr7XtHqbPYSn56DcZF0gWsghBkq0o Br2iW6C+uEVPkgfnQlPgOqcSsFJZlSUJULsnBdwrChUIeQJoqis/gmmWYpHw6FT2rr86 ZJEnHBMKt/fW+EqsSolSURfGqPSn9t+gPo3ArmpRDSKt3znzjY3pjS6tQzunQqwTKboB frEA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.247.68 with SMTP id yc4mr814959obc.67.1383845820255; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 09:37:00 -0800 (PST)
Sender: kerlyn2001@gmail.com
Received: by 10.60.73.6 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 09:37:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CE9FED51.24CE9%d.sturek@att.net>
References: <CAK=bVC_+kfbW3+LCG7tY72LKjeYPj3aJNFuAGCqq2HREq=ypBg@mail.gmail.com> <CE9FED51.24CE9%d.sturek@att.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 09:37:00 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: AAVByPYD1XzamKnowZu8FtivuX0
Message-ID: <CABOxzu2V07nU1N=G_7aW8gCMJznJ_7t9kvvyQ2Epqp6zs524pw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kerry Lynn <kerlyn@ieee.org>
To: Don Sturek <d.sturek@att.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e015384d68a589904ea99b6df"
Cc: Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name>, "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6lo] WG adoption of draft-ietf-6man-6lobac
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discussion of a WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lo>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 17:37:22 -0000

On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Don Sturek <d.sturek@att.net> wrote:

> Hi Ulrich,
>
> Agree we should adopt the draft.
>
> Hi Don,

The current version of this draft can be found at
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-6lobac-01


> A couple of points that I think need clarification:
> 1)  6lobac applies only to the master (essentially, as I understood it
> from the presentation yesterday, the slaves stay as MS/TP only devices
> without IPv6 support)
>

The third paragraph in section 1.3 states

  Slave nodes transmit only when polled and are not considered
  part of this specification.

 2)  Whether there are any ND implications (I believe the native MS/TP
> addresses are just 16 bits......)
>
> The unicast address mapping used by ND is spelled out in section 8
and is identical to the mapping used by RFC 4944 for short 802.15.4
MAC addresses.

Hope that clarifies these two points.

Regards, -K-


> Don
>
>
> On 11/6/13 11:03 AM, "Ulrich Herberg" <ulrich@herberg.name> wrote:
>
> >The feeling in the room yesterday was that draft-ietf-6man-6lobac
> >should be adopted as WG document. If there are objections to the
> >adoption, please send them to the mailing list until November 20.
> >
> >Thanks
> >Ulrich
> >_______________________________________________
> >6lo mailing list
> >6lo@ietf.org
> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6lo mailing list
> 6lo@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email