IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lo] WG adoption of draft-ietf-6man-6lobac

Don Sturek <d.sturek@att.net> Thu, 07 November 2013 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <d.sturek@att.net>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1515E21E8139 for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 08:38:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.118
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.118 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11, DATE_IN_PAST_12_24=0.992]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ATzcMEgErY45 for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 08:38:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nm12-vm7.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm12-vm7.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [216.109.114.246]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51B5721E81C5 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 08:37:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [66.196.81.162] by nm12.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Nov 2013 16:37:36 -0000
Received: from [98.139.244.53] by tm8.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Nov 2013 16:37:36 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp115.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Nov 2013 16:37:36 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=att.net; s=s1024; t=1383842256; bh=bltLJDtKdXM5uCywXW1nut4jJlA5AAfqU0jzvUp9Euc=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-Rocket-Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Thread-Topic:In-Reply-To:Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding; b=SEvfc7832lzlyHkQkyom1GxGr7GEkxWEzBKM81RKknpl8XfYLN3bSoxPBeKFFsBGYXjPqSadB0gJar4fiobWVIEUkJOa4N1qDxHROFxRlybEuPlvP84np7/OJAdyZU1H5p8Hu2gy4+1SDd0RDdIlbGUqbBRpmZvgZu/heDkxW5Y=
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 186424.77899.bm@smtp115.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-YMail-OSG: JOZTAfQVM1kU9Ke7myWXd0IhdSnkJ_NMfRlcCq6EhvTGHjW 0SjMHYhMZCxgaFI99g4ZqkbDESAEGA7q2js38Jd8MpS.sFCclBcH5T58dG2P P1e7Pw4Qs7lzdPX0yM.ofwwkhF1Z.gEqZyJ84tYCYnaMDDWR4kLw.ddB.ASj MTazNKeZk7tCJQlRWHKrgwG_reKnCgz8uAkMTEAoaAHQEyjl1b1bMiE36lvi ELG3vgLH1eVvsBmnEo_8HRZ5iVQncrVLUJeNdBaGq.5HpmlZ2cXtBqw.Ag1x 9fhU2ZEfSCSKhMNLbHZqHxsEi82g48c1.ff2X9Pvz1CdeHhM5LDBw3Ielzby Hb9mUPA4nPJXUyxtvnesA_qQhj8132oCcZTz8CObETGnSOvORgc1y72aWqQy _qkEKHqjm7PbT0bQubxMzh2_BX2APRvSBC4raALMVOFXhUKsWoQQHZT8a.av i7_I1T9wMd6Urh27KB6TlvzEULgsO9yMR4_lq9X0HoIbt3jAKcx2X9tbpCy5 dGi01etzL6JY747MgVeajv8rwcjXnED6YDvqZNKuqU1N4hRQ-
X-Yahoo-SMTP: fvjol_aswBAraSJvMLe2r1XTzhBhbFxY8q8c3jo-
X-Rocket-Received: from [31.133.164.70] (d.sturek@31.133.164.70 with ) by smtp115.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 07 Nov 2013 08:37:36 -0800 PST
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.8.130913
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 12:59:47 -0800
From: Don Sturek <d.sturek@att.net>
To: Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name>, "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <CE9FED51.24CE9%d.sturek@att.net>
Thread-Topic: [6lo] WG adoption of draft-ietf-6man-6lobac
In-Reply-To: <CAK=bVC_+kfbW3+LCG7tY72LKjeYPj3aJNFuAGCqq2HREq=ypBg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [6lo] WG adoption of draft-ietf-6man-6lobac
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discussion of a WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lo>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 16:38:38 -0000

Hi Ulrich,

Agree we should adopt the draft.

A couple of points that I think need clarification:
1)  6lobac applies only to the master (essentially, as I understood it
from the presentation yesterday, the slaves stay as MS/TP only devices
without IPv6 support)
2)  Whether there are any ND implications (I believe the native MS/TP
addresses are just 16 bits......)

Don


On 11/6/13 11:03 AM, "Ulrich Herberg" <ulrich@herberg.name> wrote:

>The feeling in the room yesterday was that draft-ietf-6man-6lobac
>should be adopted as WG document. If there are objections to the
>adoption, please send them to the mailing list until November 20.
>
>Thanks
>Ulrich
>_______________________________________________
>6lo mailing list
>6lo@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email