[6lo] Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-lynn-6lo-6lobac-bis-00.txt
Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Tue, 21 October 2025 17:22 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: 6lo@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: 6lo@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DBFA79AD94F for <6lo@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 10:22:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.688
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.688 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_TVD_MIME_EPI=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lK6VJt2xQZks for <6lo@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 10:22:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74AC779AD85B for <6lo@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 10:21:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id F114C18010; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 13:21:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with LMTP id hi3eV71wq3tg; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 13:21:04 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1761067264; bh=lv9VdIT9z5H7WUnCd2exnGZlhwdUR9o9qVB2ZjEp/v4=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=genLWT5QrSjgdjGFk+8sr3JosL6vFlL4P1Nd4C2Huu+w6dbUP+WM80Vnu5kfGdY/I UqVPAw19EuPucgRc2+Kxjv0mNZpGwejL91xyJoG5fjEHdCdk9p6Dw4LyZvowNTpM3A 0m0F+9t+poLyEhzstrRFJN4Jh8vpuZMP61qQuFjYO1mwrO2ld7m59LBW+Gv2/8c+gd 2S+QpVSVcKI3IdlYpPlqAKKg/C/CXfM1NMT/JjsoKInUV2qJEZMZ7jNi+29i3Ld0Pf 0xm1DIiRKWk1tiUZddIcayXr9MLGcxcXodl5cJvLhJdGm4gjrT5TfURfyyLlb6lcVD k6gtLwukShN+w==
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AE9A1800E; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 13:21:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4611D1EA; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 13:21:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: Kerry Lynn <kerlyn=40ieee.org@dmarc.ietf.org>, 6lo@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CABOxzu0Bv1o2ry4j0tcU-Yw5y7dg5bpMWyRjtOHqEoRhMjjteg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABOxzu0Bv1o2ry4j0tcU-Yw5y7dg5bpMWyRjtOHqEoRhMjjteg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.8+dev; GNU Emacs 28.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0;<'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 13:21:04 -0400
Message-ID: <17441.1761067264@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Message-ID-Hash: UY24RLND2GYVAXTW5PM4WUUKFY6PPZH4
X-Message-ID-Hash: UY24RLND2GYVAXTW5PM4WUUKFY6PPZH4
X-MailFrom: mcr@sandelman.ca
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-6lo.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [6lo] Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-lynn-6lo-6lobac-bis-00.txt
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/SSbt43deTaEsCf99nes_hBJVwpw>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:6lo-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:6lo-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:6lo-leave@ietf.org>
Kerry Lynn <kerlyn=40ieee.org@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> I have submitted this I-D in order to update RFC 8163 to reflect the name
> change of the underlying MS/TP data link in the ASHRAE BACnet standard. I
> have also updated references and incorporated the one errata that was
> reported.
Cool.
> The differences mainly are to do with terminology, with the exception of
> fixing the errata. It may be the case that there's a better way to make the
> requisite changes to the RFC but we can discuss this in the meeting. Please
> let me know if you have any questions.
Could this document go to Internet Standard?
Maybe you want to name this rfc8163bis somewhere in the name?
A trick/bug in the DT is that you can't easily diff against RFCs, but you can diff
against the last I-D:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/diff?doc_1=draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac-08&doc_2=draft-lynn-6lo-6lobac-bis-00&iddiff=1
I would prefer a 6lo-rfc8163bis-00 that was identical to the RFC,
and then a -01 that has your changes.
- [6lo] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-lynn-6lo-6lobac-bis-… Kerry Lynn
- [6lo] Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-lynn-6lo-6lobac-… Michael Richardson