Re: [6lo] PASA smart home use case

[Esko Dijk <[e-mail]>]

Hi Luigi,

Thanks, this clarifies it I think! So now there is a two-level hierarchy to apply PASA addressing.

To introduce the new acronym I would suggest:


in figure Figure 2, where a PLC router in each room

->

in Figure 2, where a PLC router (PLC-R) in each room



And change ‘TV bell’ to ‘door bell’ ;-)



regards

Esko

From: Luigi IANNONE <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 13:32
To: Esko Dijk <[e-mail]>; Zhe Lou <[e-mail]>; Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
Subject: RE: [6lo] PASA smart home use case


Hi Esko,



Would the following updates figure + text c be more clear and address you concern?



Ciao



L.



3.2.  Smart Home



   Smart home or home domotica is another example, as shown in figure

   Figure 2, where a PLC router in each room is used to connect home

   appliances (boiler, dishwasher, fridge, etc.) and devices (lights,

   doorbell, sound boxes, etc.) to the Home Gateway.  The network can be

   further extended if a switch/router is connected.  As it leverages

   the power line distribution, the network forms a typical tree

   topology as well.  Some observations and considerations are:



   *  Usually a Home Gateway bridges the smart home to the Internet.



   *  The Home Gateway, the PLC routers, and most of the home appliance

      are fixed in different locations.  They rarely move after setup.



   *  The smart home automation requires any to any communication.



   *  Lightweight communication stack with limited MCU and RAM

      consumption is desired.



                               /----------\

                              |  Internet  |

                               \-----+----/

                                     |

                              +------+------+

                              | Home Gateway|

                              +------+------+

                                     |

                      +--------------+----------------------+

   +------------------|----++--------|-----------++---------|---------+

   |                  |    ||        |           ||         |         |

   |                  |    ||        |           ||         |  Kitchen|

   |  Living       +--+---+||    +---+--+ Bedroom||     +---+--+      |

   |  Room         |PLC-R |||    |PLC-R |        ||     |PLC-R |      |

   |               +---+--+||    +--+---+        ||     +---+--+      |

   |                   |   ||       |            ||         |         |

   |  +-----+-----+----+   ||  +----+--+------+  ||  +------+------+  |

   |  |     |     |    |   ||  |       |      |  ||  |      |      |  |

   |  |     |     |    |   ||  |       |      |  ||  |      |      |  |

   | /+\   /+\   /+\  /+\  || /+\     /+\    /+\ || /+\    /+\    /+\ |

   ||   | |   | |   ||   | |||   |   |   |  |   ||||   |  |   |  |   ||

   | \-/   \-/   \-/  \-/  || \-/     \-/    \-/ || \-/    \-/    \-/ |

   |      Switches    Door ||Strip  Voice   Sound||Boiler Fridge  Dish|

   |Light      TV bell     ||Light  Command Boxes||             Washer|

   +-----------------------+|       Device       |+-------------------+

                            +--------------------+





> -----Original Message-----

> From: 6lo <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> On Behalf Of Esko Dijk

> Sent: Tuesday, 15 November 2022 10:21

> To: Zhe Lou <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; Michael Richardson

> <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>

> Subject: Re: [6lo] PASA smart home use case

>

> The common implementation is an external PLC interface plug, to which an

> Ethernet cable is plugged that runs to a free Ethernet port of the Home

> Router. But a built-in PLC interface is also well possible, same network

> diagram in either case :)

>

> I have a bit of concern about the naming of the "PLC GW" - a gateway as

> terminology has a potentially wide scope and may be translating at all layers

> (e.g. between different link technologies, or different application layer

> command sets, IP to non-IP, or a combination of all these).

> If the link technology on top of the PLC GWs is PLC, and on the bottom of the

> PLC GWs it is also PLC, then it is more like a "PLC router" (6LR in 6LoWPAN

> terms).

>

> If the link technology on top of the PLC GWs is PLC, and on the bottom it is

> something different (e.g. wireless 6LoWPAN?) then it is more like a

> PLC/6LoWPAN Border Router (6LBR).

>

> It would be useful to clarify here; the role of PLC GW is now a bit confusing.

> For example in many houses you can plug the PLC Home Router in the living

> room, and another device in the attic, and both sides would connect over

> powerline without any gateway/IP-router device in between.

>

> Esko

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Zhe Lou <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>

> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 09:19

> To: Michael Richardson <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; Esko Dijk

> <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>

> Subject: RE: [6lo] PASA smart home use case

>

> Engineering-wise, it is definitely possible to design a home gateway with a

> PLC module inside. Actually it is a good idea. I should suggest it to my Internet

> provider :)

>

> Regards

> David

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Michael Richardson [mailto:[e-mail]]

> Sent: Monday, 14 November 2022 18:48

> To: Esko Dijk <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; Zhe Lou

> <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>

> Subject: Re: [6lo] PASA smart home use case

>

>

> I assumed that the HomeRouter had a physical interface that was a PLC.

> Maybe it's physically a USB cable, but the PLC's layer-3 interface was inside

> the homerouter.

>

> --

> Michael Richardson <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )

>            Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

>

>

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> 6lo mailing list

> [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>

> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo