IETF Logo Mail Archive

[6lo] Poll: WG opinion on draft-ayers-low-power-interop

Carles Gomez Montenegro <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu> Fri, 23 October 2020 08:56 UTC

Return-Path: <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E82E3A0A88 for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 01:56:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.032
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.032 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_HTTP=0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SOCKS=1.927, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A4veEkqXtZu2 for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 01:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from violet.upc.es (violet.upc.es [147.83.2.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AA243A0A87 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 01:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from entelserver.upc.edu (entelserver.upc.es [147.83.39.4]) by violet.upc.es (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id 09N8twIv049091 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 10:55:58 +0200
Received: from webmail.entel.upc.edu (webmail.entel.upc.edu [147.83.39.6]) by entelserver.upc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 438201D53C3 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 10:55:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from 83.38.106.121 by webmail.entel.upc.edu with HTTP; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 10:55:58 +0200
Message-ID: <05168fff8967391c7ee663cb22dfcff3.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 10:55:58 +0200
From: Carles Gomez Montenegro <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu>
To: 6lo@ietf.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21-1.fc14
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.100.3 at violet
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Greylist: ACL matched, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.9 (violet.upc.es [147.83.2.51]); Fri, 23 Oct 2020 10:55:58 +0200 (CEST)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/_H0UjcfvewtuOsloYxYKKYXcm2U>
Subject: [6lo] Poll: WG opinion on draft-ayers-low-power-interop
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 08:56:04 -0000

Dear 6Lo WG,

Authors of draft-ayers-low-power-interop have approached the independent
submission editor for possible publication of the document.

Before proceeding further, we would need to know which is the opinion of
the WG regarding this document. The document was presented at IETF 102 and
IETF 108. While some feedback was given by 6Lo participants in both
meetings, we believe that there is not enough information to determine
what is the opinion of the WG regarding the document.

In particular, we would like to know if the WG would like to work in this
document. Additional feedback on specific topics, such as whether protocol
actions and new functionality suggested in the document should be
developed or not, will be very useful as well.

This message starts a two-week call for opinions and feedback on this
document, which will end by Friday, 6th of November, EOB.

Thank you in advance.

Cheers,

Shwetha and Carles

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email