Re: [6lo] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-14

[Yong-Geun Hong <[e-mail]>]

Dear Robert Sparks.

Thanks for your valuable reviews and comments.

For your last comment regarding Section 3, I will update the sentence in a
next revision to provide concrete meaning.

Best regards.

Yong-Geun.

2022년 11월 18일 (금) 오전 1:36, Robert Sparks via Datatracker <[e-mail]>님이
작성:

> Reviewer: Robert Sparks
> Review result: Ready
>
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
> effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These
> comments
> were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.
> Document
> editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other
> review
> comments.
>
> This document is ready for publication as an Informational RFC
>
> Thanks for addressing my Last Call comments. The new Security
> Considerations
> text is helpful (though I would have preferred even more).
>
> I'll point to one last potential problem spot (as a nit) that you may wish
> to
> reconsider. See Section 3 at:
>
> "Encryption is important if the implementation can afford it."
>
> >From the rest of the document, it's clear that Encryption is important
> even if
> the implementation _can't_ afford it (and what does "afford it" even mean
> in
> this context)?
>
> Please try to find more specific text to convey what you are trying to say.
>
>
>