Re: [6lo] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-14

[Yong-Geun Hong <[e-mail]>]

Dear Carlos Bernardos.

Thanks for your valuable reviews and comments.

For your two comments (Not to have explicit references to WGs and
expression IEEE standard),
I will update in a next revision as your comments.

Best regards.

Yong-Geun.

2022년 11월 18일 (금) 오전 4:08, Carlos Bernardos via Datatracker <
[e-mail]>님이 작성:

> Reviewer: Carlos Bernardos
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases.
> These
> comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area
> Directors.
> Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they
> would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them
> along
> with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more
> details on
> the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/>.
>
> The document describes the applicability of IPv6 over 6lo networks and
> provides
> some examples of practical deployments. The document is well written and
> provides a very good set of references for the interested reader to
> continue
> digging.
>
> I think given the nature of the document, there are not issues for
> INT-AREA, as
> those aspects that would be indeed very relevant there are mostly tackled
> on
> the many other documents that are referenced. I find the document quite
> informative though and I enjoyed and learned quite a lot reading it.
>
> Based on my review, if I was on the IESG I would ballot this document as
> YES.
>
> The following are minor issues (typos, misspelling, minor text
> improvements)
> with the document:
>
> - I would personally prefer not to have explicit references to WGs, as the
> document probably will live longer that the 6lo WG (though there are
> examples
> on the IETF for the other way around ;) ) and I think the document should
> not
> assume that the reader is familiar with IETF WGs.
>
> - "for the IEEE Std 802.15.4[IEEE802159].)" --> "for the IEEE Std 802.15.4
> [IEEE802159].)"
>
>
>
>