Re: [6lowpan] I-D of interest to this list - Zigbee Application Protocol over UDP/IP, including 6LoPWAN

Hi Joe,

The draft is there to get people thinking about a way to use IP as a  
technical solution to some of the interoperability issues that are  
arising in the space. If folks in the ZigBee Alliance are interested  
in including the idea in their specification, I'd be happy to work  
with the them.

Gil

On Oct 9, 2008, at 5:15 PM, Joe Polastre wrote:

> David and Gil,
>
>  Is there any possibility of working with the Zigbee Alliance to
> allow alternate networking (namely 6lowpan) underneath the Zigbee
> Application Protocol in future revisions of the Zigbee Specification?
> This would be the biggest win for customers, since the IETF
> informational draft you sent describes a fork of the Zigbee
> Specification.  While technically this makes quite a bit of sense, it
> will only add additional confusion to multitude of networking options
> that customers and integrators are struggling to understand.
>
> -Joe
>
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Kris Pister  
> <pister@eecs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
>> Nice.  The beginning of the end for the Zigbee network stack.  Few  
>> will
>> mourn it's passing.
>>
>> ksjp
>>
>> David Culler wrote:
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tolle-cap-00
>>
>> ________________________________
>> _______________________________________________
>> 6lowpan mailing list
>> 6lowpan@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> 6lowpan mailing list
>> 6lowpan@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> 6lowpan mailing list
> 6lowpan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan

_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
6lowpan@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan