[6tisch] Erik Kline's Yes on draft-ietf-6tisch-msf-17: (with COMMENT)

Erik Kline via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sat, 12 September 2020 05:45 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietf.org
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2923B3A0D2B; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 22:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Erik Kline via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-6tisch-msf@ietf.org, 6tisch-chairs@ietf.org, 6tisch@ietf.org, Pascal Thubert <pthubert@cisco.com>, pthubert@cisco.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.16.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <159988955295.5378.1016841714466012830@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 22:45:52 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/-S-eKbRGm0zBzDeFYLGpJPP9t5w>
Subject: [6tisch] Erik Kline's Yes on draft-ietf-6tisch-msf-17: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 05:45:53 -0000

Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-6tisch-msf-17: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


[[ nits ]]

[ section 2 ]

* "to do at each time slots" -> "to do at each time slot"

* "there is a frame to sent" -> "there is a frame to be sent"

[ section 4.3 ]

* "the pledge continue listening" -> "the pledge continues listening"

[ section 4.4 ]

* "After selected a JP" ->
  "After selecting a JP" or "After having selected a JP"

[ section 4.8 ]

* "AutRxCell" -> "AutoRxCell"?

* "for new pledge" -> "for new pledges"?

[ section 5.1 ]

* "used to both type of" -> "used for both type of"?

[ section 8 ]

* "consequence of randomly cell selection" ->
  "consequence of random cell selection"?

[ section 9 ]

* "define din" -> "defined in"

[ section 16 ]

* "considrations" -> "considerations"

* "to hand that packet" -> "to handle that packet", maybe